THE FEATURES OF AGENCY LABOR AND LABOR OF EMPLOYEES, WHO ARE TEMPORARY SENT BY EMPLOYER TO OTHER INDIVIDUALS AND LEGAL ENTITIES
( Pp. 107-111)
More about authors
Bryukhina Evgeniya Rafikovna
kand. yurid. nauk. Dolzhnost: docent. Mesto raboty: FGAOU VO «Nauchno-issledovatelskiy universitet «Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki». Filial: Permskiy filial. Podrazdelenie: kafedra grazhdanskogo i predprinimatelskogo prava.
National Research University «Higher School of Economics». Branch: Perm branch Patyrbaeva Kseniia Vadimovna kand. filos. nauk, magistrant. Mesto ucheby: NIU «Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki». Dolzhnost: docent. Mesto raboty: FGBOU VO Permskaya gosudarstvennaya selskohozyaystvennaya akademiya imeni akademika D.N. Pryanishnikova. Podrazdelenie: kafedra filosofii.
National Research University «Higher School of Economics»; Perm State Agricultural Academy named after D.N. Pryanishnikov
National Research University «Higher School of Economics». Branch: Perm branch Patyrbaeva Kseniia Vadimovna kand. filos. nauk, magistrant. Mesto ucheby: NIU «Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki». Dolzhnost: docent. Mesto raboty: FGBOU VO Permskaya gosudarstvennaya selskohozyaystvennaya akademiya imeni akademika D.N. Pryanishnikova. Podrazdelenie: kafedra filosofii.
National Research University «Higher School of Economics»; Perm State Agricultural Academy named after D.N. Pryanishnikov
Abstract:
The most important trend in modern labor relations is to enhance flexibility and the occurrence of atypical forms of employment, including the emergence of agency labor. The problem of agency labor is given considerable attention in the foreign science (Durand P., Schiek D, S. Hausman, Houseman, S., Kalleberg A. etc.) as well as domestic jurisprudence (A.M. Lushnikov, N.E. Yakovenko, F.A. Supryaga et al.). With the adoption of the Federal Law № 116-FZ, the use of agency labor in the Russian Federation is legally prohibited, while at the same time the work of employees, who are temporary sent by employer to other individuals and legal entities is allowed. In this regard, there is need in comparative analysis of these two forms of employment to identify the specificity of relations in this sphere. Using the method of analysis and comparative legal method, the authors shows in the article the features of agency labor and labor of employees, who are temporary sent by employer to other individuals and legal entities. Particular attention is paid to the characteristics of labor of employees, who are temporary sent by employer to other individuals and legal entities (subject structure of this relationships, specifics of contracts, and specifics of wage and so on.). Authors concluded that there are some similarities between agency labor and labor of employees, who are temporary sent by employer to other individuals and legal entities. Also there is the need to improve labor law, since the gaps and conflicts in labor legislation today create the conditions for the violation of labor of employees, who are temporary sent by employer to other individuals and legal entities. Results of the study may be useful to professionals involved in the study of the current state of labor relations; practicing lawyers; employers who expect the provision or use of employees, who are temporary sent by employer to other individuals and legal entities; as well as all who interested in the current state of labor law in Russia.
How to Cite:
Bryukhina E.R., Patyrbaeva K.V., (2016), THE FEATURES OF AGENCY LABOR AND LABOR OF EMPLOYEES, WHO ARE TEMPORARY SENT BY EMPLOYER TO OTHER INDIVIDUALS AND LEGAL ENTITIES. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 7 => 107-111.
Reference list:
Zaytseva O.B. Netipichnye formy zanyatosti v Rossii: voprosy teorii i praktiki // Voprosy trudovogo prava. 2011. № 8. S. 8 - 21.
Zakalyuzhnaya N.V. Zaemnyy trud i skhozhie atipichnye otnosheniya // Trudovoe pravo v Rossii i za rubezhom. 2014. № 2. S. 35 - 37.
Zakon RF ot 19.04.1991 n 1032-1 (red. ot 09.03.2016) O zanyatosti naseleniya v rossiyskoy federatsii // Sobranie Zakonodatel stva RF , n 17, 22.04.1996, st. 1915.
Zlobin R.R. Zaemnyy trud i sotsial naya zashchita naemnykh rabotnikov // Izvestiya saratovskogo universiteta. Nov. ser. 2012. T. 12. Ser. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya, vyp. 4. S. 25-29.
Korshunova T.YU. Pravovoe regulirovanie otnosheniy, svyazannykh s napravleniem rabotnikov dlya vypolneniya rabot v drugikh organizatsiyakh (zaemnyy trud) // Trudovoe pravo. 2005. № 6. C. 23-25.
Kurennoy A.M. Gibkost v sfere truda: sovremennye rossiyskie realii // Sovremennye tendentsii v razvitii trudovogo prava i prava sotsial nogo obespecheniya: sb. M., 2007. S.327.
Lushnikov A.M. usilenie gibkosti trudovykh otnosheniy kak otvet na vyzovy XXI veka: prichiny vvedeniya i predely osushchestvleniya // Rynok truda v XXI veke: v poiskakh gibkosti i zashchity. Vil nyus, 2011. S. 112-122.
Lushnikov A.M., Lushnikova M.V. trudovye prava v XXI veke: sovremennoe sostoyanie i tendentsii razvitiya. M.: Prospekt, 2016g. 272s.
Mitrich O.N. deyatel nost po predostavleniyu personala // prakticheskiy bukhgalterskiy uchet. 2016. № 1. S. 29 - 36
Nurtdinova A.F. Zaemnyy trud: osobennosti organizatsii i vozmozhnosti pravovogo regulirovaniya // KHozyaystvo i pravo. 2004. № 9 / SPS Konsul tant plyus .
Postanovlenie FAS Povolzhskogo okruga ot 04.05.2012 Po Delu № A55-17704/2011.
Pshenichnikov S.V. Zaemnyy trud kak forma nestandartnykh trudovykh otnosheniy // Sovremennyy yurist. 2013. № 4 (5). S. 124-134.
Pshenichnikov S.V. Pravovoe regulirovanie truda rabotnikov, napravlyaemykh rabotodatelem k drugim fizicheskim ili yuridicheskim litsam: Dissertatsiya na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata yuridicheskikh nauk. Moskva, 2015. 229 s.
Pshenichnikov S.V. Razrabotka osnovnykh printsipov pravovogo regulirovaniya zaemnogo truda kak uslovie zashchity prav zaemnykh rabotnikov // Sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Vypusk 6 / Otv. Red. A.A. Bureev. M.: Izdatel stvo MNYUI, 2014. S. 134-139.
Svetlichnaya, I.S. Rebrending zaemnogo truda // Prakticheskaya Bukhgalteriya. 2016. № 2. S. 68 - 71
Supryaga, ZH.A. Autstaffing: kak gotovit sya k izmeneniyam s 2016 goda / Trudovoe pravo. 2015. № 4. S. 67 - 74.
Trudovoy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 30.12.2001 N 197-FZ (Red. Ot 30.12.2015) // Sobranie Zakonodatel stva RF , 07.01.2002, № 1 (CH. 1), St. 3.
YAkovenko, N.E. Zaemnyy trud vne zakona / Informatsionnyy byulleten Ekspress-Bukhgalteriya . 2014. № 20. S. 13 - 16.
Durand P. La discipline du marche du travail // P. Durand. Traite du Droit du travail. Tome II. Dalloz. Paris, 1950.
Houseman, S., A. Kalleberg, and B. Erickcek. The role of temporary help agencies in tight labor markets // Upjohn Institute Staff Working Paper. 2001. No. 01-73.
Schiek D. Agency Work - from Marginalisation towards Acceptance Agency work in EU Social and Employment Policy and the implementation of the draft Directive on Agency work into German law // German Law Journal. 2004. Vol. 5. No. 10. P. 1245.
Zakalyuzhnaya N.V. Zaemnyy trud i skhozhie atipichnye otnosheniya // Trudovoe pravo v Rossii i za rubezhom. 2014. № 2. S. 35 - 37.
Zakon RF ot 19.04.1991 n 1032-1 (red. ot 09.03.2016) O zanyatosti naseleniya v rossiyskoy federatsii // Sobranie Zakonodatel stva RF , n 17, 22.04.1996, st. 1915.
Zlobin R.R. Zaemnyy trud i sotsial naya zashchita naemnykh rabotnikov // Izvestiya saratovskogo universiteta. Nov. ser. 2012. T. 12. Ser. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya, vyp. 4. S. 25-29.
Korshunova T.YU. Pravovoe regulirovanie otnosheniy, svyazannykh s napravleniem rabotnikov dlya vypolneniya rabot v drugikh organizatsiyakh (zaemnyy trud) // Trudovoe pravo. 2005. № 6. C. 23-25.
Kurennoy A.M. Gibkost v sfere truda: sovremennye rossiyskie realii // Sovremennye tendentsii v razvitii trudovogo prava i prava sotsial nogo obespecheniya: sb. M., 2007. S.327.
Lushnikov A.M. usilenie gibkosti trudovykh otnosheniy kak otvet na vyzovy XXI veka: prichiny vvedeniya i predely osushchestvleniya // Rynok truda v XXI veke: v poiskakh gibkosti i zashchity. Vil nyus, 2011. S. 112-122.
Lushnikov A.M., Lushnikova M.V. trudovye prava v XXI veke: sovremennoe sostoyanie i tendentsii razvitiya. M.: Prospekt, 2016g. 272s.
Mitrich O.N. deyatel nost po predostavleniyu personala // prakticheskiy bukhgalterskiy uchet. 2016. № 1. S. 29 - 36
Nurtdinova A.F. Zaemnyy trud: osobennosti organizatsii i vozmozhnosti pravovogo regulirovaniya // KHozyaystvo i pravo. 2004. № 9 / SPS Konsul tant plyus .
Postanovlenie FAS Povolzhskogo okruga ot 04.05.2012 Po Delu № A55-17704/2011.
Pshenichnikov S.V. Zaemnyy trud kak forma nestandartnykh trudovykh otnosheniy // Sovremennyy yurist. 2013. № 4 (5). S. 124-134.
Pshenichnikov S.V. Pravovoe regulirovanie truda rabotnikov, napravlyaemykh rabotodatelem k drugim fizicheskim ili yuridicheskim litsam: Dissertatsiya na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata yuridicheskikh nauk. Moskva, 2015. 229 s.
Pshenichnikov S.V. Razrabotka osnovnykh printsipov pravovogo regulirovaniya zaemnogo truda kak uslovie zashchity prav zaemnykh rabotnikov // Sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Vypusk 6 / Otv. Red. A.A. Bureev. M.: Izdatel stvo MNYUI, 2014. S. 134-139.
Svetlichnaya, I.S. Rebrending zaemnogo truda // Prakticheskaya Bukhgalteriya. 2016. № 2. S. 68 - 71
Supryaga, ZH.A. Autstaffing: kak gotovit sya k izmeneniyam s 2016 goda / Trudovoe pravo. 2015. № 4. S. 67 - 74.
Trudovoy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 30.12.2001 N 197-FZ (Red. Ot 30.12.2015) // Sobranie Zakonodatel stva RF , 07.01.2002, № 1 (CH. 1), St. 3.
YAkovenko, N.E. Zaemnyy trud vne zakona / Informatsionnyy byulleten Ekspress-Bukhgalteriya . 2014. № 20. S. 13 - 16.
Durand P. La discipline du marche du travail // P. Durand. Traite du Droit du travail. Tome II. Dalloz. Paris, 1950.
Houseman, S., A. Kalleberg, and B. Erickcek. The role of temporary help agencies in tight labor markets // Upjohn Institute Staff Working Paper. 2001. No. 01-73.
Schiek D. Agency Work - from Marginalisation towards Acceptance Agency work in EU Social and Employment Policy and the implementation of the draft Directive on Agency work into German law // German Law Journal. 2004. Vol. 5. No. 10. P. 1245.
Keywords:
extra work, the workers sent temporarily by an employer to other individuals and legal entities, labor laws.
