OBJECTIVE TRUTH IN THE CRIMINAL PROCESS AS BURDEN OF PROOF
( Pp. 196-200)

The article tells about the principle of objective truth in the criminal process, that implies activation position of the court, who should have the right not only to assess the evidence presented by the parties, but to collect it yourself. The bill of the principle of objective truth is one of the most discussed in the present. Task - explores the prospects of introduction of the Institute of objective truth, which will bring the elements of the inquisitorial process, when the judge along with their features judging performs the functions of prosecution and investigation. Model - framework of work-universal dialectic-materialis- tic cognition method of objective reality. Used scientific methods of analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction. Conclusions - the constitutional principle of justice only by the court of not aligning with the performance of his powers to fight crime. The scope of the study/possibility of subsequent use of the results of scientific work - сontent work identity can be used in further research associated with the development of the analyzed problem. Practical importance - some of the findings may be taken into account in the practice of the courts, taken into account in the discussion of the draft law on the introduction to the criminal process of the Institute of objective truth. Originality/value - Based on the analysis of norms of the criminal procedure law, studied the Institute of objective truth. Is intended for scientists, educators, and students in all areas of law, as well as practical workers of law enforcement.

Osipova N.V., (2014), OBJECTIVE TRUTH IN THE CRIMINAL PROCESS AS BURDEN OF PROOF. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 5 => 196-200.

Balakshin V.S. Ob ektivnaya istina kak tsel dokazyvaniya // Elektronnyy resurs URL: http://www.superinf.ru/view helpstud.php id 697.
Informatsionno-diskussionnyy portal // Elektronnyy resurs // URL: http://rapsinews.ru/incident news/20140429/271232567.html).
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 28.11.1996 g. № 19-P quot;Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti stat i 418 Ugolovno - protsessual nogo kodeksa RSFSR v svyazi s zaprosom Karatuzskogo rayonnogo suda Krasnoyarskogo kraya quot; // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 1996 g. № 234.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 20.04.1999 g. № 7-P quot;Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozheniy punktov 1 i 3 chasti pervoy stat i 232, chasti chetvertoy stat i 248 i chasti pervoy stat i 258 Ugolovno-protsessual nogo kodeksa RSFSR v svyazi s zaprosami Irkutskogo rayonnogo suda Irkutskoy oblasti i Sovetskogo rayonnogo suda goroda Nizhniy Novgorod quot; // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 1999 g. № 80.
KHmelevskaya S.A. CHto est istina: peshchernye teni ili blesk yarkogo solntsa // Sotsial no-politicheskie nauki. №3. 2013g. S. 6.
Isaeva R.M. K voprosu bytiya tayny sledstviya v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. № 2. 2014g. S. 242.

the return of criminal case to the Prosecutor, conventional concept, logic, objective truth, the adversarial principle, the fact.