Adequatization of Criminal Prohibition as the Second Stage of Criminalization: Instruments of Criminal Law and Criminal Justice System
( Pp. 160-164)

More about authors
Nechaev Alexey Dmitrievich Dolzhnost: nauchnyy sotrudnik. Podrazdelenie: Otdel problem prokurorskogo nadzora i ukrepleniya zakonnosti v sfere ugolovno-pravovogo regulirovaniya, ispolneniya ugolovnyh nakazaniy i inyh mer ugolovno-pravovogo haraktera Nauchno-issledovatelskogo instituta.
Academy of the Russian Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation
Abstract:
Background and research field: Unsystemized principles of criminalization and the presence of antagonistic positions about such principles led the author to the criminalization model, implicitly and explicitly developed in Russian (A.I. Korobeev, V.N. Kudryavtsev, A.M. Yakovlev) and foreign (A. Harduf) doctrine of criminal law. Based on a critical rethinking of the approaches proposed in the literature, it is developed a two-stage model of criminalization. The first stage of this model is dangerization of act and the second one is adequatization of criminal prohibition. In the article the author defines adequatization of criminal prohibition and indicate its main substages. A great deal of attention has been paid to the first substage of this process - the determination of instruments of criminal law and criminal justice system. Results: The author concludes that in the process of criminalization it is obligatory required to determine following: is the criminal law able to counteract a given type of behavior and thus prevent harm to social relations? Attention is drawn to the fact that the instrumental evaluation of criminal law requires to take into account incapacitation, deterrence and intimidation, while the retribution, condemnation and rehabilitation are not work methods of criminal law. The author also provides a system of criminal justice resources that should be subject to evaluation in order to determine whether the enforcement of written law.
How to Cite:
Nechaev A.D., (2016), ADEQUATIZATION OF CRIMINAL PROHIBITION AS THE SECOND STAGE OF CRIMINALIZATION: INSTRUMENTS OF CRIMINAL LAW AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 5 => 160-164.
Reference list:
Antonova E.YU. Dokazyvanie kak vid poznaniya i ego teoreticheskoe i prakticheskoe znachenie // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2015. - №1.
Belyaev N.A. Ugolovno-pravovaya politika i puti ee realizatsii. - L.: Izd-vo Leningrad. un-ta, 1986. - 176 s.
Vasin YU.G. O nekotorykh sovremennykh tendentsiyakh ugolovno-pravovoy politiki v sfere bor by s ekonomicheskoy prestupnost yu // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2013 - № 6.
Genrikh N.V. Predmet i metod ugolovno-pravovogo regulirovaniya avtoref. dis. d-ra yurid. nauk. - Ryazan , 2011. - 60 s.
ZHalinskiy A.E. Ugolovnoe pravo v ozhidanii peremen: teoretiko-instrumental nyy analiz. - M., 2009. - 400 s.
Zagorodnikov N.I. Sovetskaya ugolovnaya politika i deyatel nost organov vnutrennikh del. - M., 1979. - 100 s.
Korobeev A.I. Sovetskaya ugolovno-pravovaya politika: problemy kriminalizatsii i penalizatsii. - Vladivostok: Izd-vo Dal nevost. un-ta, 1987. - 268 s.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Pravovoe povedenie: norma i patologiya. - M.: Nauka, 1982. - 287 s.
Lopashenko N.A. Osnovy ugolovno-pravovogo vozdeystviya. Ugolovnoe pravo, ugolovnyy zakon, ugolovno-pravovaya politika. - SPb.: YUrid. tsentr Press, 2004. - 339 s.
Markuntsov S.A. Teoriya ugolovno-pravovogo zapreta: dis. d-ra yurid. nauk. - M., 2015. - 550 s.
Osnovaniya ugolovno-pravovogo zapreta. Kriminalizatsiya i dekriminalizatsiya / otv. red.: Kudryavtsev V.N., YAkovlev A.M. - M.: Nauka, 1982. - 303 s.
Pudovochkin YU.E. Problemy politicheskogo v prestuplenii i prestupnogo v politike (metodologicheskie razmyshleniya) // Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauch. zhurn. - 2013. - № 2 (7).
Sundurov F.R. Nakazanie i al ternativnye mery v ugolovnom prave. - Kazan , 2005. - 300 s.
Ugolovnoe pravo. Obshchaya chast . Prestuplenie. Akademicheskiy kurs. V 10 t. T. I. Ponyatie ugolovnogo prava. Mekhanizm ugolovno-pravovogo regulirovaniya / pod red. N.A. Lopashenko. M.: YUrlitinform, 2016. S. 314.
SHargorodskiy M.D. Nakazanie, ego tseli i effektivnost // SHargorodskiy M.D. Izbrannye trudy. - SPb.: YUrid. tsentr Press, 2004. - 657 s.
Bentham J. Theory of Legislation. - London: Trubner Co., 1864.
Harduf A. How Crimes Should Be Created: A Practical Theory of Criminalization // Criminal Law Bulletin. - 2013. - Vol. 49. - № 1.
Husak D. Four Points About Drug Decriminalization // Criminal Justice Ethics. - 2003. - Vol. 22. - Issue 1.
Murphy J.G. Legal Moralism and Retribution Revisited // Criminal Law and Philosophy. - 2007. - Vol. 1.
Packer H. The Limits of the Criminal Sanctions. - Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1968.
Keywords:
criminalization, adekvatizatsiya ban, pravoohranitelnye, intimidation, intimidation, Kara, the criminal justice system.