OTHER CRIMES CLASSIFIED ACCORDING TO THE SEVERITY OF BODILY HARM
( Pp. 191-197)

An article on the General characteristics of crimes against health and criminal law regulation - article 111 of The Criminal Code of the Russian Federation - was published in the third issue of our magazine for 2018. This article continues a series of publications on the qualifications’ specifics of crimes of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Articles 112 -115, and 118 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation are subject to legal analysis here. Controversial issues that do not have a uniform interpretation in the doctrine and investigative and judicial practice are analyzed in the article. A large number of scientific works are devoted to the regulation of liability for causing harm to health. These include works of O.Artyushina, E.Bagun, I.Boiko, G.Borzenkov, S.Borodina, N.Durmanov, N.Zagorodnikov, V.Zubkova, V.Kashepov, A.I. Korobeev, A.Nikiforov, S.Rastoropov, E.Sidorenko, D.Chitlov, M.Shargorodsky and many other authors. The problems of responsibility for causing bodily harm to health existing in law enforcement practice are revealed in this article based on the systematic approach and such private-scientific methods as statistical, formal-logical and comparative-legal mehtods. Controversial issues of the application of the legal framework, its interpretation in the decisions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on the qualification of these crimes against health are analyzed here. Conclusions about discussion issues of the qualification of intended bodily harm and unintentional infliction of bodily harm are made here. Also the article deals with the interpretation of qualifying elements of a crime, also with terms that can be estimated and with the punishability of crimes against health.

Kazakova V.A., (2018), OTHER CRIMES CLASSIFIED ACCORDING TO THE SEVERITY OF BODILY HARM. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 4 => 191-197.

Postanovlenie Pravitel stva RF ot 17 avgusta 2007 g. N 522 (red. ot 17.11.2011) quot;Ob utverzhdenii Pravil opredeleniya stepeni tyazhesti vreda, prichinennogo zdorov yu cheloveka quot;. http://www.consultant.ru
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 27 sentyabrya 2012 g. N 19 O primenenii sudami zakonodatel stva o neobkhodimoy oborone i prichinenii vreda pri zaderzhanii litsa, sovershivshego prestuplenie . http://www.consultant.ru.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii № 1 ot 27 yanvarya 1999 g. O sudebnoy praktike po delam ob ubiystve (st.105 UK RF) .
Rospravosudie. Ofitsial nyy sayt: https://rospra-vosudie.com/court-bessonovskij-rajonnyj-sud-penzenskaya-oblast-s/act-106888995/
Bagun E.A. Zdorov e cheloveka kak ob ekt poboev i istyazaniya//Trudy Orenburgskogo instituta (filiala) Moskovskoy gosudarstvennoy yuridicheskoy akademii. 2013.№ 18. S. 108- 115.
Gasanova YA.O. Ubiystvo v sostoyanii affekta: aktual nye problemy i osobennosti normy // Advokatskaya praktika. 2006. № 3. S. 30-33.
Irincheev V. V. Osobennosti ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za ubiystvo, sovershennoe v sostoyanii affekta // Sovremennye problemy raskrytiya, rassledovaniya i preduprezhdeniya prestupleniy protiv zhizni: materialy vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii (Ulan-Ude, 09 dekabrya 2016 g.) / nauch. red. YU. V. KHarmaev, E. L. Radnaeva. - Ulan-Ude: Izdatel stvo Buryatskogo gosuniversiteta, 2017. S. 37-44.
Lopashenko N.A. Ubiystva: monografiya.- M.: YUrlitinform. 2013. 540 s.
Rastoropov S.V. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana zdorov ya cheloveka ot prestupnykh posyagatel stv: Monografiya, 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. - SPb.: Izdatel stvo R.Aslanova YUridicheskiy tsentr Press . 2006. 489 s.
TSyro I.V. Sudebno-psikhiatricheskaya otsenka tyazhesti vreda zdorov yu pri psikhicheskikh rasstroystvakh u poterpevshikh. M., 2004. S. 141.

the bodily injury, the duration of the illness, disability, a state of passion, exceeding the limits of necessary defense, abuse measures, necessary to arrest a person, committed a crime.