Controversial Issues of Interpretation of Certain Qualified Kinds of Murder in Theory of Criminal Law and Court Practice
( Pp. 127-129)
More about authors
Nurkaeva Tatyana N.
d-r yurid. nauk, professor, professor kafedry ugolovnogo prava
Ufa Law Institute of the Interior Ministry of Russia Divaeva Irina Rafaelovna kand. yurid. nauk, docent. Dolzhnost: nachalnik kafedry. Mesto raboty: Ufimskiy yuridicheskiy institut MVD Rossii. Podrazdelenie: kafedra ugolovnogo prava i kriminologii
Ufa Institute of Law Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Ufa Law Institute of the Interior Ministry of Russia Divaeva Irina Rafaelovna kand. yurid. nauk, docent. Dolzhnost: nachalnik kafedry. Mesto raboty: Ufimskiy yuridicheskiy institut MVD Rossii. Podrazdelenie: kafedra ugolovnogo prava i kriminologii
Ufa Institute of Law Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Abstract:
The judicial errors in applying certain types of qualified kinds of murder prompted the writing of this article. The methodological basis of the work involves a dialectical method of scientific knowledge, as well as the following special ones: logical, systematic, dogmatic and comparative-legal. The article presents the author's vision on the interpretation of certain types of qualified murder that cause controversy in the theory of criminal law and court practice. The possibility of the subsequent use of the results of the scientific work is seen in the fact that the authors make recommendations for improvement of the judicial practice in murder cases. The practical significance lies in the fact that the work contains recommendations for individual qualifications of signs of murder aimed to their uniform interpretation and use in the law enforcement process. The originality of the work is determined by the author's approach to the interpretation of individual qualified signs of murder. This work is intended for teaching staff of law schools, post-graduate students, applicants and students who are interested in the issues of criminal law and qualification of crimes, as well as for law enforcement officers, prosecutors and judges.
How to Cite:
Nurkaeva T.N., Divaeva I.R., (2014), CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES OF INTERPRETATION OF CERTAIN QUALIFIED KINDS OF MURDER IN THEORY OF CRIMINAL LAW AND COURT PRACTICE. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 2 => 127-129.
Reference list:
Borzenkov G. N. Kvalifikatsiya prestupleniy protiv zhizni i zdorov ya: Uchebno-prakticheskoe posobie. M.: IKD Zertsalo-M , 2005. S. 46;
Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 1997. № 12. S. 9;
Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 1998. № 4. S. 9-10.
Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 1999. № 3. S. 5.
Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2000. № 8. S. 19.
Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2001. № 8. S. 12.
Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 1999. № 3. S. 3.
Galaktionov S. A. Realizatsiya printsipa spravedlivosti pri kvalifikatsii prestupleniy po sovokupnosti. Ugolovnoe pravo: strategiya razvitiya v KHKHI veke: materialy Sed moy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii 28-29 yanvarya 2010 g. M: Prospekt, 2010. S. 147.
Kondrashova T. V. Problemy ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za prestupleniya protiv zhizni, zdorov ya, polovoy svobody i polovoy neprikosnovennosti. Ekaterinburg: Gumanitarnyy un-t, 2000. S. 68.
Ozhegov S. I., SHvedova N. YU. Tolkovyy slovar russkogo yazyka. 4-e izd., dopolnennoe. M.: Azbukovnik, 1999. S. 748.
Pobegaylo E. Krizis sovremennoy rossiyskoy ugolovnoy politiki // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2004. № 4. S. 112.
Ugolovnoe pravo. Osobennaya chast . Uchebnik dlya vuzov / Pod red. I. YA. Kozachenko, Z. A. Neznamovoy, G. P. Novoselova. M.: INFRA M-NORMA, 1998. S. 54.
Divaeva I.R., Nikolaeva T.V. Teoreticheskie voprosy naznacheniya nakazaniya pri nalichii smyagchayushchikh obstoyatel stv (st. 62 UK RF) // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2013. - №2.
Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 1997. № 12. S. 9;
Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 1998. № 4. S. 9-10.
Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 1999. № 3. S. 5.
Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2000. № 8. S. 19.
Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2001. № 8. S. 12.
Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 1999. № 3. S. 3.
Galaktionov S. A. Realizatsiya printsipa spravedlivosti pri kvalifikatsii prestupleniy po sovokupnosti. Ugolovnoe pravo: strategiya razvitiya v KHKHI veke: materialy Sed moy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii 28-29 yanvarya 2010 g. M: Prospekt, 2010. S. 147.
Kondrashova T. V. Problemy ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za prestupleniya protiv zhizni, zdorov ya, polovoy svobody i polovoy neprikosnovennosti. Ekaterinburg: Gumanitarnyy un-t, 2000. S. 68.
Ozhegov S. I., SHvedova N. YU. Tolkovyy slovar russkogo yazyka. 4-e izd., dopolnennoe. M.: Azbukovnik, 1999. S. 748.
Pobegaylo E. Krizis sovremennoy rossiyskoy ugolovnoy politiki // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2004. № 4. S. 112.
Ugolovnoe pravo. Osobennaya chast . Uchebnik dlya vuzov / Pod red. I. YA. Kozachenko, Z. A. Neznamovoy, G. P. Novoselova. M.: INFRA M-NORMA, 1998. S. 54.
Divaeva I.R., Nikolaeva T.V. Teoreticheskie voprosy naznacheniya nakazaniya pri nalichii smyagchayushchikh obstoyatel stv (st. 62 UK RF) // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2013. - №2.
Keywords:
the qualified kinds of murder, the murder of two and more persons, the murder combined with the Commission of another crime.
Related Articles
