Some questions of qualification of burglaries committed in complicity
( Pp. 170-175)

Article is devoted to the peculiarities of development of burglaries committed in complicity. The author examines features of the accomplices in the theft, introduces the concept of a hierarchy of partners. For example, investigative and judicial practice discussed the qualifications of theft committed by a group of persons United by preliminary agreement and organized group. Suggestions on improvement of criminal legislation and its application in part on burglaries committed in complicity.

Petruhnov S.N., (2014), SOME QUESTIONS OF QUALIFICATION OF BURGLARIES COMMITTED IN COMPLICITY. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 2 => 170-175.

Gordeev R.N. Obshchestvennaya opasnost gruppovogo prestupleniya // Ugolovnoe pravo i sovremennost : mezhvuzovskiy sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Vyp. 9 / Sibirskiy yuridicheskiy institut MVD Rossii; otv. red. I.A. Kirillov. Krasnoyarsk. 2005. S. 193-197.
Zyryanov V.V., Lazarev A.V. K voprosu raskrytiya krazh, sovershennykh organizovannoy gruppoy // Aktual nye problemy raskrytiya i rassledovaniya prestupleniy: mezhvuzovskiy sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Vypusk 9 / Sibirskiy yuridicheskiy institut MVD Rossii; otv. red. S.D. Nazarov. Krasnoyarsk. 2006. S. 120-123.
Kirienko N.G. O kvalifikatsii souchastiya v khishchenii s nezakonnym proniknoveniem v zhilishche, pomeshchenie, inoe khranilishche // Aktual nye problemy bor by s prestupleniyami i inymi pravonarusheniyami: Materialy Pyatoy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Barnaul. 2007. S. 163-167.
Koksharov S.S. Nekotorye voprosy kvalifikatsii souchastiya v khishcheniyakh sotsialisticheskogo imushchestva putem prisvoeniya, rastraty ili zloupotrebleniya sluzhebnym polozheniem // Voprosy preduprezhdeniya prestupnosti. Tomsk. 1967. S. 43-44.
Kriger G.A. Kvalifikatsiya khishcheniy sotsialisticheskogo imushchestva. M. 1971.
Larichev V.D., Sapozhnikov G.A. Ugolovno-pravovye i kriminologicheskie aspekty bor by s krazhami chernykh i tsvetnykh metallov: monografiya. M. 2010. S. 43-46.
Lopashenko N. Novoe postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo suda RF po khishcheniyam // Zakonnost . № 3 (821). S. 32-34.
Lysak V.V. Prestupleniya protiv sobstvennosti: Monografiya. Domodedovo. 2006.
Novikova YU.V. Rassledovanie krazh, sovershennykh gruppoy lits. Nauchno-metodicheskoe posobie. M. 2005.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 10.06.08 № 8 O sudebnoy praktike rassmotreniya ugolovnykh del ob organizatsii prestupnogo soobshchestva (prestupnoy organizatsii) // Garant.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 14.02.2002 № 7 O sudebnoy praktike po delam o prestupleniyakh nesovershennoletnikh // Garant.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 27.12.02 № 29 O sudebnoy praktike po delam o krazhe, grabezhe i razboe // Garant.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 27.12.07 № 51 O sudebnoy praktike po delam o moshennichestve, prisvoenii i rastrate // Garant.
Tuzlukov A.M. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost za krazhu po deystvuyushchemu zakonodatel stvu Rossii: Avtoref. dis kand. yurid. nauk / Akademiya prava i upravleniya Minyusta Rossii. Ryazan . 2001.
Tuliglovich M.A. Problemy souchastiya v prestupleniyakh protiv sobstvennosti // Mezhdunarodnye yuridicheskie chteniya: materialy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Omsk. 2008. S. 160-164.
Ushakov D.N. Bol shoy tolkovyy slovar sovremennogo russkogo yazyka. M. 2005.
SHesler A.V. Osobennosti ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti organizatorov prestupnykh grupp // Problemy primeneniya novogo ugolovnogo i ugolovno-ispolnitel nogo zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Materialy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Tomsk. 1997. S. 28-34.
SHesler A.V. Ugolovno-pravovye aspekty obshchestvennoy opasnosti gruppovogo prestupleniya // Ugolovnoe pravo i sovremennost : Mezhvuzovskiy sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Vypusk 4. Krasnoyarsk. 2000. S. 37-

Theft, the contractor theft, the organizer of the theft, an accomplice of theft, the instigator of the theft, hierarchy accomplices to the theft, forms of complicity in theft.