Some features of protection of the rights of the minor child who has lost parental care, at transactions on alienation of property belonging to it
( Pp. 87-91)

Illegal alienation of property owned by the minor child is, unfortunately, common in domestic reality. This problem, despite the fact that it attracts a lot of attention of legislators, law enforcement and the public is still waiting for a decent legal solutions. Various aspects of this problem extensively studied representatives of legal science, but noteworthy proposals on elimination of consequences of a violation of property rights of minors expressed very infrequently. The author's purpose in this article was to analyze the features of redress for children left without parental care, with the illegal alienation of property belonging to him, a comparative analysis of existing methods of protection established by various regulations. To achieve this goal by consistently applies methods of system- structural analysis, formal-legal, comparative legal methods. The author explores the conditions of invalidity of transactions made with minors, provided ways to protect domestic legislation violated property rights, considers the mechanism of protection of property interests wards used in some foreign countries. Besides investigating the contents of the legal regulation, the author examines the opinions of experts on the aforesaid issues, advances and defends their own judgment. The novelty of the present article may be expressed in the fact that it provides a fair and reasonable criticism of a legal mechanism for returning illegally expropriated property on the basis of a minor application of the Civil Code of the invalidity of transactions. The usefulness of this article is seen in the fact that the author found and legally justified effective mechanism for returning the property as a special effects termination of the contract for the alienation based on paragraph 4 of Art. 21 of the guardianship. Social result of adopting this mechanism, agencies and community organizations to protect the rights of the child lies in increasing the effectiveness in upholding these rights in the courts. Inferences website listed in the submitted article, worthy to become the subject of further discussion by leading experts in the field of child protection.

Kasyanova I.N., (2014), SOME FEATURES OF PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF THE MINOR CHILD WHO HAS LOST PARENTAL CARE, AT TRANSACTIONS ON ALIENATION OF PROPERTY BELONGING TO IT. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 2 => 87-91.

Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast pervaya) ot 30.11.1994 № 51-FZ // SPS-Konsul tant Plyus URL: www.bill.consultant.ru (data obrashcheniya 27.01.2014)
Zaklyuchenie po proektu Federal nogo zakona N 184675-4 Ob opeke i popechitel stve , vnesennomu deputatami Gosudarstvennoy Dumy E.F. Lakhovoy, P.V. Krasheninnikovym, V.V. Panovym, L.V. Pepelyaevoy (povtorno k pervomu chteniyu) // URL: www.bill.consultant.ru (data obrashcheniya 27.01.2014)
Postanovlenie ot 21.04.2003 № 6-P Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozheniy p. 1 i 2 st. 167 GK RF v svyazi s zhalobami grazhdan O.M. Marinichevoy, A.V. Nemirovskoy, Z.A. Sklyanovoy, R.M. Sklyanovoy i V.M. SHiryaeva // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2003. 26 apr.
Sklovskiy K.I. Predstavitel stvo v grazhdanskom prave i protsesse: dis. kand. yurid. Nauk: 12.00.03. M., 2003.
Tarasova A.E. Pravosub ektnost grazhdan. Osobennosti pravosub ektnosti nesovershennoletnikh, ikh proyavleniya v grazhdanskikh pravootnosheniyakh. Moskva: Volters Kluver , 2008.
Federal nyy zakon Ob opeke i popechitel stve ot 24.04.2008 № 48-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2008 g. № 17. St. 1755.
Guardianship of Property of Minor Children Information Brochure. Toronto: Office of the Children s Lawyer, 2003.
Probate Court User Guide for Guardianship of Minors. State of Connecticut: The Office of Probate Court Administration, 2013.

the disposition of the property, owned by minors, left without parental care, the recognition of the transaction invalid, the application of consequences of invalidity of a void transaction, termination of the contract in court.