Initial moment of prosecution in the light of specific reasonable time CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
( Pp. 247-250)
More about authors
Kaats Maria E.
kand. yurid. nauk, docent kafedry ugolovnogo processa
Ufa Law Institute of the Interior of Russia
Ufa Law Institute of the Interior of Russia
Abstract:
Task - to discuss issues related to the procedure for calculating the initial moment a reasonable period of criminal proceedings, draws attention to the contradictions in the existing legislation. Model - Methodological basis of - universal dialectical materialist method of cognition of objective reality. Used scientific methods - analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction. Through private research - formal legal method to analyze and summarize the content of the legislation governing the analyzed problem. Conclusions - Procedural time period beginning calculus reasonable time is an imperfect criminal justice system in terms of its legal regulation. On this basis, proposed to amend the existing legislation. Scope of the study / the possibility of subsequent use of the results of scientific work - Maintenance work complements the scientific and legal basis of the institute reasonable time can be used for further investigations related to the development problem being analyzed, with the preparation of amendments and additions to existing legislation. Practical value - Separate conclusions of the work may be considered in the practice of the courts, prosecutors and preliminary investigation when questions of compensation for violations of the right to trial within a reasonable time. Originality / value - Based on analysis of existing legislation and the position of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, studied theoretical and applied aspects of procedural time period beginning calculus reasonable period of criminal proceedings. It is intended for scientists, educators, students in all areas of legal profile.
How to Cite:
Kaats M.E., (2014), INITIAL MOMENT OF PROSECUTION IN THE LIGHT OF SPECIFIC REASONABLE TIME CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 2 => 247-250.
Reference list:
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 25.06.2013g. № 14-P quot;Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozheniy ch.1 st.1, p.1 ch.1, ch.ch.6 i 7 st.3 FZ quot;O kompensatsii za narushenie prava na sudoproizvodstvo v razumnyy srok ili prava na ispolnenie sudebnogo akta v razumnyy srok quot;, ch.ch.1 i 4 st.244.1 i p.1 ch.1 st.244.6 GPK RF v svyazi s zhaloboy grazhdanki A.E. Popovoy quot; // quot;Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF quot;, 01.07.2013, N 26, st. 3428.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF №1-P Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti otdel nykh polozheniy UPK RSFSR, reguliruyushchikh polnomochiya suda po vozbuzhdeniyu ugolovnogo dela, v svyazi s zhaloboy grazhdanki I.P. Smirnovoy i zaprosom VS RF : ot 14.01.2000 g. // quot;Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF quot;, 31.01.2000, N 5, st. 611.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF №11-P Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozheniy ch. 1 st. 47 i ch. 2 st. 51 UPK RSFSR v svyazi s zhaloboy grazhdanina V.I. Maslova : ot 27.06.2000 g. // quot;Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF quot;, 03.07.2000, N 27, st. 2882.
Postanovlenie Plenuma VS RF № 30, Plenuma VAS RF № 64 ot 23.12.2010 g. O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikshikh pri rassmotrenii del o prisuzhdenii kompensatsii za narushenie prava na sudoproizvodstvo v razumnyy srok ili prava na ispolnenie sudebnogo akta v razumnyy srok // quot;Rossiyskaya gazeta quot; ot 14 yanvarya 2011 g. N 5.
Malikova N.V., Kaats M.E., Kudina S.A. Nekotorye problemnye voprosy zakonodatel nogo regulirovaniya instituta obespecheniya bezopasnosti uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2013 - №2.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF №1-P Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti otdel nykh polozheniy UPK RSFSR, reguliruyushchikh polnomochiya suda po vozbuzhdeniyu ugolovnogo dela, v svyazi s zhaloboy grazhdanki I.P. Smirnovoy i zaprosom VS RF : ot 14.01.2000 g. // quot;Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF quot;, 31.01.2000, N 5, st. 611.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF №11-P Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozheniy ch. 1 st. 47 i ch. 2 st. 51 UPK RSFSR v svyazi s zhaloboy grazhdanina V.I. Maslova : ot 27.06.2000 g. // quot;Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF quot;, 03.07.2000, N 27, st. 2882.
Postanovlenie Plenuma VS RF № 30, Plenuma VAS RF № 64 ot 23.12.2010 g. O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikshikh pri rassmotrenii del o prisuzhdenii kompensatsii za narushenie prava na sudoproizvodstvo v razumnyy srok ili prava na ispolnenie sudebnogo akta v razumnyy srok // quot;Rossiyskaya gazeta quot; ot 14 yanvarya 2011 g. N 5.
Malikova N.V., Kaats M.E., Kudina S.A. Nekotorye problemnye voprosy zakonodatel nogo regulirovaniya instituta obespecheniya bezopasnosti uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2013 - №2.
Keywords:
the criminal process, criminal prosecution, reasonable time criminal proceedings, the beginning of criminal prosecution, the criteria for calculating a reasonable time in criminal proceedings, the criminal process, criminal prosecution, reasonable time criminal proceedings, the beginning of criminal prosecution, the criteria for calculating a reasonable time in criminal proceedings, the criminal process, criminal prosecution, reasonable time criminal proceedings, the beginning of criminal prosecution, the criteria for calculating a reasonable time in criminal proceedings.
