ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS AS EVIDENCE IN THE INVESTIGATIO OF CRIMES
( Pp. 232-237)
More about authors
Logvinenko Elena Alexandrovna
kand. yurid. nauk. Dolzhnost: docent. Podrazdelenie: kafedra ugolovnogo prava, processa i kriminalistiki.
Kuban state university. Branch: Tihoretsk branch
Kuban state university. Branch: Tihoretsk branch
Abstract:
Despite the relative modernity topic, its peculiarities and problems were already predvoshitil and discussed in Soviet times. As to consider the problems associated with the discussion is not possible, the article considers some aspects of engaging in the practice of investigative bodies and courts of modern tools and technologies that enable the transfer of evidentiary information, with minimal spending of time. Work with documents in organizations of any kind associated with the solution of many multi-level tasks. With the growing number of tasks, increases the volume of the documents themselves, their complexity: finding information, keeping it current, ensuring confidentiality and safety of documents, etc. Processes of paper currency in the «request-response» does not allow to adequately respond to the emerging imbalance limited periods of pre-trial investigation and long-time expenses required for obtaining help and orienting information, able to solve tasks complete, comprehensive and objective examination of the materials of the preliminary investigation. For the above tasks are designed modules, with which all employees in the organization of work with documents mainly in electronic form. The discussed questions are: clarification of certain concepts; the legal status, the use in evidence of electronic materials and their attached to the criminal case; the application of special knowledge in the field of high technologies for the production of various measures and investigative actions. The materials of this article can be used in the classroom, as in criminology, and other disciplines in the discussion of the relevant topics. Theses of article can be used on occupations, as on criminalistics, and other disciplines during discussion of the corresponding subjects of occupations.
How to Cite:
Logvinenko E.A., (2014), ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS AS EVIDENCE IN THE INVESTIGATIO OF CRIMES. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 2 => 232-237.
Reference list:
Ugolovno-protsessual nyy kodeks RF (prinyat GD 22 noyabrya 2001 g) // SPS Konsul tant .
Federal nyy zakon ot 06.04.2011 g. № 63-FZ Ob elektronnoy podpisi .
Federal nyy zakon O federal nykh organakh pravitel stvennoy svyazi i informatsii . Vedomosti SND i VS RF № 2 ot 25 marta 1993 g. St. 423.
Instruktsiya o poryadke predstavleniya rezul tatov operativno-rozysknoy deyatel nosti organu doznaniya, sledovatelyu, prokuroru ili v sud. Utv. Prikazom FSNP, FSB, MVD, FSO, FPS, GTK i SVR Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13 maya 1998 g. № 1603.
GOST 6.10.4-84, pis mo TSentral nogo banka Rossii ot 2.06.1998 g. № 122-T O perechne osnovnykh usloviy ob obmene elektronnymi dokumentami .
Metodicheskie ukazaniya po vnedreniyu i primeneniyu GOST 6.10.4-84 Pridanie yuridicheskoy sily dokumentam na mashinnom nositele i mashinnogramme, sozdavaemym sredstvami vychislitel noy tekhniki , i dr.
Katunin G.P. Telekommunikatsionnye sistemy i seti: Ucheb. posobie i dr. Novosibirsk, 2000. T. 2. S. 347.
Kosovets A.A. Pravovoe regulirovanie elektronnogo dokumentooborota // Vestn. Mosk. un-ta Ser.11. Pravo. 1997. № 4. S. 56.
Sarkisyan L.R. Sravniteno-pravovoy analiz ispol zovaniya elektronnykh dokazatel stv v grazhdanskom i ugolovnom protsessakh//Materialy NPK. Odessa, 2009. S. 530.
Sirik M.S. Komp yuternaya prestupnost : ugolovno-pravovye, kriminologicheskie i protsessual nye aspekty: monografiya / M.S. Sirik. - Armavir, 2008. - S. 5.
Sokolov YU.N. Nekotorye vidy informatsionnykh tekhnologiy v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve i ORD.//Materialy NPK. CHelyabinsk, 2009 g. S.455.
Strakh A. Domennye spory v Rossii // Doklad na seminare ICANN Upravlenie Internetom i sistema domennykh imen v Rossii: rol ICANN , Moskva, 13 oktyabrya 2001 // http://www.russianlaw.net/law/doc/a131.htm
Sukharev A. YA., Krutskikh V. E., Sukhareva A.YA. Bol shoy yuridicheskiy slovar . M.: Infra-M. 2003.
Tkachev A.V. Problema predstavleniya pechati v kachestve dopolnitel nogo rekvizita mashinnogo dokumenta//Vestn. Mosk. un-ta. Ser.11. Pravo.1999.№ 2. S. 68.
Filimonov S.A. Nekotorye problemy bor by s kiberprestupnost yu kak samykh opasnykh transnatsional nykh prestupleniy // Elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal Apriori. Ceriya: Gumanitarnye nauki , 2014. № 1. / www.apriori-journal.ru /
CHasnyk K.A. Neobkhodimost zashchity informatsii v deyatel nosti OVD // YUrist- Pravoved. 2000. № 1 S. 59.
Federal nyy zakon ot 06.04.2011 g. № 63-FZ Ob elektronnoy podpisi .
Federal nyy zakon O federal nykh organakh pravitel stvennoy svyazi i informatsii . Vedomosti SND i VS RF № 2 ot 25 marta 1993 g. St. 423.
Instruktsiya o poryadke predstavleniya rezul tatov operativno-rozysknoy deyatel nosti organu doznaniya, sledovatelyu, prokuroru ili v sud. Utv. Prikazom FSNP, FSB, MVD, FSO, FPS, GTK i SVR Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13 maya 1998 g. № 1603.
GOST 6.10.4-84, pis mo TSentral nogo banka Rossii ot 2.06.1998 g. № 122-T O perechne osnovnykh usloviy ob obmene elektronnymi dokumentami .
Metodicheskie ukazaniya po vnedreniyu i primeneniyu GOST 6.10.4-84 Pridanie yuridicheskoy sily dokumentam na mashinnom nositele i mashinnogramme, sozdavaemym sredstvami vychislitel noy tekhniki , i dr.
Katunin G.P. Telekommunikatsionnye sistemy i seti: Ucheb. posobie i dr. Novosibirsk, 2000. T. 2. S. 347.
Kosovets A.A. Pravovoe regulirovanie elektronnogo dokumentooborota // Vestn. Mosk. un-ta Ser.11. Pravo. 1997. № 4. S. 56.
Sarkisyan L.R. Sravniteno-pravovoy analiz ispol zovaniya elektronnykh dokazatel stv v grazhdanskom i ugolovnom protsessakh//Materialy NPK. Odessa, 2009. S. 530.
Sirik M.S. Komp yuternaya prestupnost : ugolovno-pravovye, kriminologicheskie i protsessual nye aspekty: monografiya / M.S. Sirik. - Armavir, 2008. - S. 5.
Sokolov YU.N. Nekotorye vidy informatsionnykh tekhnologiy v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve i ORD.//Materialy NPK. CHelyabinsk, 2009 g. S.455.
Strakh A. Domennye spory v Rossii // Doklad na seminare ICANN Upravlenie Internetom i sistema domennykh imen v Rossii: rol ICANN , Moskva, 13 oktyabrya 2001 // http://www.russianlaw.net/law/doc/a131.htm
Sukharev A. YA., Krutskikh V. E., Sukhareva A.YA. Bol shoy yuridicheskiy slovar . M.: Infra-M. 2003.
Tkachev A.V. Problema predstavleniya pechati v kachestve dopolnitel nogo rekvizita mashinnogo dokumenta//Vestn. Mosk. un-ta. Ser.11. Pravo.1999.№ 2. S. 68.
Filimonov S.A. Nekotorye problemy bor by s kiberprestupnost yu kak samykh opasnykh transnatsional nykh prestupleniy // Elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal Apriori. Ceriya: Gumanitarnye nauki , 2014. № 1. / www.apriori-journal.ru /
CHasnyk K.A. Neobkhodimost zashchity informatsii v deyatel nosti OVD // YUrist- Pravoved. 2000. № 1 S. 59.
Keywords:
electronic documents, electronic evidence, the ways of fixing of the evidentiary information, electronic storage media information, digital signature, special knowledge in the field of computer technology.