Proof in criminal cases involving allegations of a person commits public calls to extremist activity
( Pp. 267-270)
Abstract:
The article analyzes the subject and the limits of proof in criminal cases involving public appeals for extremist activity. The conclusion is not appropriate standard fastening subject of proof in criminal proceedings. The author's interpretation of the limits of proof. Formulated system of ideas about the content of proof in criminal cases in this category.
How to Cite:
Mikheev A.V., (2014), PROOF IN CRIMINAL CASES INVOLVING ALLEGATIONS OF A PERSON COMMITS PUBLIC CALLS TO EXTREMIST ACTIVITY. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 2 => 267-270.
Reference list:
Aleksandrov A.S., Bostanov R.A. Ispol zovanie proizvodnykh dokazatel stv v ugolovnom protsesse: monografiya. M.: YUrlitinform. 2013. S. 113-115.
Aleksandrov A.S., Frolov S.A. Otnosimost ugolovno-protsessual nykh dokazatel stv: monografiya. N. Novgorod: Nizhegorodskaya pravovaya akademiya. 2011. S. 94-110.
Lupinskaya P.S. Resheniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. Ikh vidy, soderzhanie i formy. M.: YUridicheskaya literatura. 1976. 168 c.
Novichkov V.E. Nekotorye problemy sovershenstvovaniya upravleniya praktikoy pravookhranitel nykh organov po primeneniyu ugolovnogo i inogo zakonodatel stva v bor be s ekstremizmom (prognoznyy aspekt) // Rossiyskiy sledovatel . 2005. № 1. S. 32-37.
O protivodeystvii ekstremistskoy deyatel nosti: Federal nyy zakon ot 25 iyulya 2002 g. № 114-FZ (red. ot 02.07.2013) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 2002. № 30. st. 3031 / SPS Konsul tant plyus. (Data obrashcheniya 11 noyabrya 2013 g.)
Teoriya dokazatel stv v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse / Otv. red. N.V. ZHogin. 2-e izd. ispr. i dop. M.: YUridicheskaya literatura. 1973. 736 s.
Fatkullin F.N. Obshchie problemy protsessual nogo dokazyvaniya. Kazan . 1976. 206 c.
Aleksandrov A.S., Frolov S.A. Otnosimost ugolovno-protsessual nykh dokazatel stv: monografiya. N. Novgorod: Nizhegorodskaya pravovaya akademiya. 2011. S. 94-110.
Lupinskaya P.S. Resheniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. Ikh vidy, soderzhanie i formy. M.: YUridicheskaya literatura. 1976. 168 c.
Novichkov V.E. Nekotorye problemy sovershenstvovaniya upravleniya praktikoy pravookhranitel nykh organov po primeneniyu ugolovnogo i inogo zakonodatel stva v bor be s ekstremizmom (prognoznyy aspekt) // Rossiyskiy sledovatel . 2005. № 1. S. 32-37.
O protivodeystvii ekstremistskoy deyatel nosti: Federal nyy zakon ot 25 iyulya 2002 g. № 114-FZ (red. ot 02.07.2013) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 2002. № 30. st. 3031 / SPS Konsul tant plyus. (Data obrashcheniya 11 noyabrya 2013 g.)
Teoriya dokazatel stv v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse / Otv. red. N.V. ZHogin. 2-e izd. ispr. i dop. M.: YUridicheskaya literatura. 1973. 736 s.
Fatkullin F.N. Obshchie problemy protsessual nogo dokazyvaniya. Kazan . 1976. 206 c.
Keywords:
extremist activities, criminal procedure proving, the subject of proof, the limits of proof.
