Analogy and subsidiary application of rules in criminal proceedings in respect of special categories of persons
( Pp. 258-260)
More about authors
Maltseva Angelina Anatolyevna
aspirantka. Podrazdelenie: kafedra ugolovnogo processa.
Ural state law Academy
Ural state law Academy
Abstract:
Objective: the main aim of the article is a discussion of the topical issues of use of analogy and subsidiary application of laws in criminal proceedings. In particular, the issue of conditionality applied various methods to overcome the law of criminal procedure socio-political motives. Research area: public relations in criminal proceedings in criminal investigation in respect of certain categories of persons. The article is devoted to the permissibility and necessity of application of analogy when resolving gaps arising from the proceedings in respect of special categories of persons. The author considers concrete examples of abuse of the right, as well as the situation in which the use of the analogy of the law or subsidiary application of the norms of the constitutional law can assist in the resolution of unsettled right situation. Conclusions: the use of analogy of law, as well as other ways of addressing gaps in criminal proceedings, to solve political problems in the absence of specific reasons for its use appears to be invalid. However, this method should be used when the actual occurrence of irregular right situations.
How to Cite:
Maltseva A.A., (2014), ANALOGY AND SUBSIDIARY APPLICATION OF RULES IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF SPECIAL CATEGORIES OF PERSONS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 2 => 258-260.
Reference list:
Zor kin V.D. Pretsedentnyy kharakter resheniy Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava.2004. № 12.
Lazarev L.V. Pravovye pozitsii Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossii. M., 2008.
Nersesyants V.S. Sud ne zakonodatel stvuet i ne upravlyaet, a primenyaet pravo (o pravoprimenitel noy prirode sudebnykh aktov) // Sudebnaya praktika kak istochnik prava. M., 1997.
Problemy obshchey teorii prava i gosudarstva / Pod red. V.S. Nersesyantsa. M., 2002.
Mal tseva A.A. Probely v ugolovno-protsessual nom zakonodatel stve, vyzvannye priznaniem norm nekonstitutsionnymi // Biznes v zakone. - 2013. - №1.
Lazarev L.V. Pravovye pozitsii Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossii. M., 2008.
Nersesyants V.S. Sud ne zakonodatel stvuet i ne upravlyaet, a primenyaet pravo (o pravoprimenitel noy prirode sudebnykh aktov) // Sudebnaya praktika kak istochnik prava. M., 1997.
Problemy obshchey teorii prava i gosudarstva / Pod red. V.S. Nersesyantsa. M., 2002.
Mal tseva A.A. Probely v ugolovno-protsessual nom zakonodatel stve, vyzvannye priznaniem norm nekonstitutsionnymi // Biznes v zakone. - 2013. - №1.
Keywords:
criminal proceedings, a gap in the law, analogy of the law, proceedings against certain categories of persons, legal status.
