To the question of delimitation in advance not promised concealment of crimes from complicity as type of partnership in a crime
( Pp. 154-157)
More about authors
Milina Olga Vladimirovna
adyunkt kafedry ugolovnogo prava
Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Abstract:
This article discusses the problematic issues connected with qualification of crimes, representing different types of complicity and in advance not promised concealment of crimes, delimitation these adjacent types of criminal activity, and also the conclusion about need of fixing of concept and forms of the implication in the crime in the General part of the Criminal Code of Russian Federation for reduction of quantity of mistakes in law-enforcement activity.
How to Cite:
Milina O.V., (2014), TO THE QUESTION OF DELIMITATION IN ADVANCE NOT PROMISED CONCEALMENT OF CRIMES FROM COMPLICITY AS TYPE OF PARTNERSHIP IN A CRIME. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 1 => 154-157.
Reference list:
Afinogenov S.V. Souchastie v prestuplenii (ponyatie, vidy i formy). Avtoref. dis kand. yurid.nauk. M., 1991. S.21.
Baymurzin, G. Otvetstvennost za prikosnovennost k prestupleniyu. Alma-Ata: Nauka, 1968. S. 96.
Dineka V.I. Ugolovnoe pravo: uchebnik//pod red. Prof.N.I. Vetrova; 4-e izd. M.,2007. S.150.
Zlobin G.A., Nikiforov B.S. Umysel i ego formy. M.,1972. S.18.
Kozlov A.P. Souchastie: traditsii i real nost .- Spb. Izd. YUridicheskiy tsent Press . 2001. S.151.
Morozov V.I., Zarubin A.V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost za zaranee obeshchannoe ukryvatel stvo prestupleniy // Advokatskaya praktika. 2007. №2. S.13.
Naumov A.V. Rossiyskoe ugolovnoe pravo. Obshchaya chast . Kurs lektsiy.- M.: Izd-vo BEK, 1996. S.295-297.
Omarov A.S. Otvetstvennost za ukryvatel stvo prestupleniy po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu. Dis. na soiskanie uch.step. kand. yur. nauk. M.,1954. S.65-68. A.V.Pushkin, YU.D. Didatov Ponyatie i priznaki souchastiya v prestuplenii. M.,1998. S.62.
KHabibullin M.KH. Otvetstvennost za ukryvatel stvo prestupleniy i nedonositel stvo po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu. Izd. Kazanskogo un-ta,1984. S.27.
Milina O.V. K voprosu o yuridicheskoy prirode i ugolovno-pravovom znachenii obstoyatel stva, isklyuchayushchego ugolovnuyu otvetstvennost za ukryvatel stvo prestupleniy, sovershennykh suprugom ili blizkim rodstvennikom // CHernye dyry v Rossiyskom zakonodatel svte. - 2014. - №1.
Baymurzin, G. Otvetstvennost za prikosnovennost k prestupleniyu. Alma-Ata: Nauka, 1968. S. 96.
Dineka V.I. Ugolovnoe pravo: uchebnik//pod red. Prof.N.I. Vetrova; 4-e izd. M.,2007. S.150.
Zlobin G.A., Nikiforov B.S. Umysel i ego formy. M.,1972. S.18.
Kozlov A.P. Souchastie: traditsii i real nost .- Spb. Izd. YUridicheskiy tsent Press . 2001. S.151.
Morozov V.I., Zarubin A.V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost za zaranee obeshchannoe ukryvatel stvo prestupleniy // Advokatskaya praktika. 2007. №2. S.13.
Naumov A.V. Rossiyskoe ugolovnoe pravo. Obshchaya chast . Kurs lektsiy.- M.: Izd-vo BEK, 1996. S.295-297.
Omarov A.S. Otvetstvennost za ukryvatel stvo prestupleniy po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu. Dis. na soiskanie uch.step. kand. yur. nauk. M.,1954. S.65-68. A.V.Pushkin, YU.D. Didatov Ponyatie i priznaki souchastiya v prestuplenii. M.,1998. S.62.
KHabibullin M.KH. Otvetstvennost za ukryvatel stvo prestupleniy i nedonositel stvo po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu. Izd. Kazanskogo un-ta,1984. S.27.
Milina O.V. K voprosu o yuridicheskoy prirode i ugolovno-pravovom znachenii obstoyatel stva, isklyuchayushchego ugolovnuyu otvetstvennost za ukryvatel stvo prestupleniy, sovershennykh suprugom ili blizkim rodstvennikom // CHernye dyry v Rossiyskom zakonodatel svte. - 2014. - №1.
Keywords:
in advance not the promised concealment of crimes, ogranichitelya signs, in advance promised concealment as a form of complicity, the implication for crime.
