Criminological risks of the implementation of the system of continuous remote control and audit of industrial safety
( Pp. 197-200)
More about authors
Salikhov Maskhud Makhmudovich
veduschiy inzhener otdela po ekspluatacii setey gazoraspredeleniy. Upravlenie ekspluatacii
AO «Mosoblgaz»
AO «Mosoblgaz»
Abstract:
The article analyzes the existing measures for ensuring industrial safety and the criminological forecast for the development of crime after the introduction of audit and remote control of industrial safety in the indicated field. The subject of the study includes the provisions of existing regulations and bills containing definitions and main features of audit and remote industrial safety monitoring institutions. The purpose of the article is to study the legal risks of using new areas of remote control and audit of the safety level of hazardous production facilities. The study revealed both the advantages and the criminological risks of existing and potentially possible remote methods for monitoring industrial safety, as well as determining the role of state control of the production sector in preventing violations of the law ensuring the safety of hazardous production facilities.
How to Cite:
Salikhov M.M., (2020), CRIMINOLOGICAL RISKS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SYSTEM OF CONTINUOUS REMOTE CONTROL AND AUDIT OF INDUSTRIAL SAFETY. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 3 => 197-200.
Reference list:
Federal nyy zakon ot 21.07.1997 № 116-FZ (red. ot 29.07.2018) O promyshlennoy bezopasnosti opasnykh proizvodstvennykh ob ektov // SZ RF. 1997. № 30. St. 3588.
Federal nyy zakon ot 26.12.2008 № 294-FZ (red. ot 02.08.2019) O zashchite prav yuridicheskikh lits i individual nykh predprinimateley pri osushchestvlenii gosudarstvennogo kontrolya (nadzora) i munitsipal nogo kontrolya // SZ RF. 2008. № 52 (ch.1). St. 6249.
Voskanyan R.O. Vzaimozavisimye litsa kak ugroza ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti // Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya. 2019. № 1. C. 24-28.
Voskanyan R.O., Ekimova K.V. Stoimostnoy podkhod k upravleniyu investitsionnoy privlekatel nost yu kompanii // Ekonomika i predprinimatel stvo. 2015. № 1 (54). S. 442-445.
Goncharenko G.S. Kommercheskiy podkup (ugolovno-pravovoy i kriminologicheskiy aspekty. Dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Rostov-na-Donu, 2012.
Dobrolyubova E.I., YUzhakov V.N. Otsenka rezul tativnosti i effektivnosti kontrol no-nadzornoy deyatel nosti. // Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal nogo upravleniya. 2015. № 4. S. 41-61.
Mamaev V.I., Pasikun V.N. Audit bezopasnosti i obyazatel noe strakhovanie opasnykh ob ektov kak sposob preduprezhdeniya avariy i katastrof tekhnogennogo kharaktera // Tekhnologii grazhdanskoy bezopasnosti. 2010. № 3. S. 66-75.
Naumov A.V. Kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii v 2 T. Tom 2. M.: YUrayt, 2017. - 549 s.
Statisticheskie svedeniya predstavleny // Sudebnogo departamenta pri Verkhovnom Sude Rossiyskoy Federatsii. - URL: http://www.cdep.ru/ Data obrashcheniya: 12.02.2020 .
Tret yak M.I. Modifikatsiya komp yuternoy informatsii i ee sootnoshenie s drugimi sposobami komp yuternogo moshennichestva // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2016. № 2. S. 95-101.
Fomenko E.V. Problemy, voznikayushchie pri reshenii voprosa ob osvobozhdenii ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za podkup dolzhnostnogo litsa // Advokatskaya praktika. 2007. № 6. S. 12-15.
CHuprova A.YU. Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost i voprosy ugolovnoy politiki // Bezopasnost biznesa. 2004. № 4. S. 28-31.
Federal nyy zakon ot 26.12.2008 № 294-FZ (red. ot 02.08.2019) O zashchite prav yuridicheskikh lits i individual nykh predprinimateley pri osushchestvlenii gosudarstvennogo kontrolya (nadzora) i munitsipal nogo kontrolya // SZ RF. 2008. № 52 (ch.1). St. 6249.
Voskanyan R.O. Vzaimozavisimye litsa kak ugroza ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti // Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya. 2019. № 1. C. 24-28.
Voskanyan R.O., Ekimova K.V. Stoimostnoy podkhod k upravleniyu investitsionnoy privlekatel nost yu kompanii // Ekonomika i predprinimatel stvo. 2015. № 1 (54). S. 442-445.
Goncharenko G.S. Kommercheskiy podkup (ugolovno-pravovoy i kriminologicheskiy aspekty. Dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Rostov-na-Donu, 2012.
Dobrolyubova E.I., YUzhakov V.N. Otsenka rezul tativnosti i effektivnosti kontrol no-nadzornoy deyatel nosti. // Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal nogo upravleniya. 2015. № 4. S. 41-61.
Mamaev V.I., Pasikun V.N. Audit bezopasnosti i obyazatel noe strakhovanie opasnykh ob ektov kak sposob preduprezhdeniya avariy i katastrof tekhnogennogo kharaktera // Tekhnologii grazhdanskoy bezopasnosti. 2010. № 3. S. 66-75.
Naumov A.V. Kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii v 2 T. Tom 2. M.: YUrayt, 2017. - 549 s.
Statisticheskie svedeniya predstavleny // Sudebnogo departamenta pri Verkhovnom Sude Rossiyskoy Federatsii. - URL: http://www.cdep.ru/ Data obrashcheniya: 12.02.2020 .
Tret yak M.I. Modifikatsiya komp yuternoy informatsii i ee sootnoshenie s drugimi sposobami komp yuternogo moshennichestva // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2016. № 2. S. 95-101.
Fomenko E.V. Problemy, voznikayushchie pri reshenii voprosa ob osvobozhdenii ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za podkup dolzhnostnogo litsa // Advokatskaya praktika. 2007. № 6. S. 12-15.
CHuprova A.YU. Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost i voprosy ugolovnoy politiki // Bezopasnost biznesa. 2004. № 4. S. 28-31.
Keywords:
remote control, industrial safety, hazardous production facility.
Related Articles
5. CRIMINAL LAW AND CRIMINOLOGY; CRIMINAL ENFORCEMENT LAW Pages: 182-184 Issue №16680
On the issue of the phenomenon of religious fundamentalism: forms of manifestation and generative factors
remote control
industrial safety
hazardous production facility
Show more
