The concept and types of economic crime: a comparative analysis of the criminal law of the Member States of the Eurasian Economic Union
( Pp. 124-130)

More about authors
Utarov Kanat A. Cand. Sci. (Law); associate professor, Department of Criminal Procedure and Forensic Science
South Kazakhstan University named after M. Auezov
Shymkent, Republic of Kazakhstan
Abstract:
The need to carry out the study is due to the fact that the legislation in the Member States of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) on combating economic crime (despite the unity of the EAEU economic space) has significant differences that cannot be considered justified from the point of view of increasing the effectiveness of combating economic crime. These differences are manifested in the fact that for similar crimes in the criminal legislation of the EAEU Member States, sentences differing in nature and severity are established. This situation, in the conditions of free movement of goods, finances and labor resources in the EAEU, according to the author, is contrary to the goals of developing the EAEU common economic space, as well as to the principles of justice and equality of citizens before the law, which are enshrined in the criminal law of all EAEU Member States. In particular, the commission of a crime in such key segments of the economy as customs regulation and entrepreneurship entails significantly different criminal law and criminal procedural consequences for persons prosecuted in some EAEU Member States and does not entail the same consequences in other EAEU Member States. According to the author, these differences also make it difficult to create a unified system for monitoring economic crime in the EAEU in the future and limit the possibilities for joint counteraction to this type of crime. The lack of a common approach to understanding the economic crime and its structure for the EAEU prevents the deepening of the integration of the common economic space of the Union, and can stimulate the “flow” of economic criminal activity into the least rigid national jurisdictions within the EAEU. The results of the study can be used by the EAEU bodies to prepare amendments to the EAEU Treaty, as well as by the legislators of the EAEU Member States in order to ensure the implementation of an agreed criminal policy in the field of combating both economic crime in general and its individual types. The main expected consequence of the publication is the intensification of the efforts of the EAEU member states to formulate coordinated approaches in the field of combating economic crime in a common market. The article is addressed to the authorities of the EAEU, the legislators of the EAEU Member States, scientists studying the problems of combating economic crime, teachers, graduate students and students of legal and economic universities.
How to Cite:
Utarov K.A., (2020), THE CONCEPT AND TYPES OF ECONOMIC CRIME: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE CRIMINAL LAW OF THE MEMBER STATES OF THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 2 => 124-130.
Reference list:
Luneev V.V. Epokha globalizatsii i prestupnost . M.: Norma, 2007. 272 c.
CHuprova A.YU., YAtselenko B.V. Elektronnaya kommertsiya kak vid ekonomicheskoy prestupnosti // Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2017. № 3. S. 239-243.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Respubliki Uzbekistan (prinyat 22 sentyabrya 1994 g.). SPb: YUridicheskiy tsentr Press, 2001.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Ugolovnyy kodeks RF ot 13 iyunya 1996 g. № 63-FZ (s izm. i dop. po sost. na 1 marta 2011 g.) // SZ RF. 1996. № 25. St. 2954.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan (Zakon Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 16 iyulya 1997 g. № 167). SPb: YUridicheskiy tsentr Press, 2001.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 3 iyulya 2014 g. // Vedomosti Parlamenta Respubliki Kazakhstan. 2014. № 13-I i 13-II. St. 83.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Kyrgyzskoy Respubliki // Vedomosti ZHogorku Kenesha Kyrgyzskoy Respubliki. 1998. №7. St.229.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Kyrgyzskoy Respubliki ot 2 fevralya 2017 g. №19 (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami po sostoyaniyu na 15.05.2019 g.) // Erkin Too. 2017. 10 fevr. № 19-20.
Kodeks Kyrgyzskoy Respubliki o prostupkakh ot 1 fevralya 2017 g. № 18 // Erkin Too. 2017. 31 yanv. № 9.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Respubliki Belarus // Natsional nyy reestr pravovykh aktov Respubliki Belarus . 1999. №76. 2/50.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Respubliki Armeniya. Predislovie E. R. Azaryana. Perevod s armyanskogo R. Z. Avakyan. SPb.: Izd-vo R. Aslanova YUridicheskiy tsentr Press , 2004.
Maksimov S.V, Utarov K.A. Prestupnost v sfere ekonomiki i problemy bor by s ney v sovremennoy Rossii. Nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie. SHymkent, 2012. S.10-11.
Ukaz Prezidenta Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 21 aprelya 2005 goda №1557 Voprosy Agentstva Respubliki Kazakhstan po bor be s ekonomicheskoy i korruptsionnoy prestupnost yu (finansovoy politsii) (utratil silu Ukazom Prezidenta Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 29 avgusta 2014 g.№ 900) // http://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/U050001557. Data obrashcheniya: 15.12.2018.
Luneev V.V. Prestupnost XX veka. Mirovye, regional nye i rossiyskie tendentsii. Izd. 2-e, pererab. i dop. M.: Volters Kluver, 2005.S.456.
Kriminologiya. Pod red. Dzh.F.SHeli. 3-e mezhdunarod. izd. (per. s angl.). SPb.: Piter, 2003. S. 271.
Karpets I.I. Prestupnost : illyuzii i real nost . M.: Rossiyskoe pravo, 1992. S.330.
Problemy bor by s proyavleniyami kriminal nogo rynka. Otv. red. V.A. Nomokonov, Vladivostok: Izd-vo DVGU, 2005.S. 130.
Tolkachenko A.A. Ekonomicheskaya prestupnost (ugolovno-pravovye voprosy). M.: Mezhdunarodnyy nezavisimyy ekologo-politologicheskiy universitet, 1994. S.6.
Kriminologiya / Pod red. N.F.Kuznetsovoy i V.V. Luneeva. M.: Volters Kluver, 2004.S.370.
Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 06.08.2012.№ 32. St. 4476.
Model nyy zakon O konkurentsii , Utv. Resheniem Vysshego Evraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo soveta ot 24 oktyabrya 2013 g. № 50 // Ofitsial nyy sayt Evraziyskoy ekonomicheskoy komissii http://www.eurasiancommission.org. Data obr.: 01.03.2020.
Rayzberg B. A., Lozovskiy L. SH., Starodubtseva E. B. Sovremennyy ekonomicheskiy slovar . 5-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: INFRA M, 2006.
Filosofskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar . M.: Sov. entsiklopediya, 1993. S.537.
Predprinimatel skoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii / Otv. red. E.P.Gubin, P.G.Lakhno. M., 2010. S.20-21.
Ozhegov S.I. Slovar russkogo yazyka. M.: Russkiy yazyk, 1987. S.739.
Marks K. Nayemnyy trud i kapital // Marks K. i Engel s F. Soch. T. 6. S.441.
УК Республики Беларусь. Мн.: Национальный центр правовой информации Республики Беларусь, 1999
Алексеев А.И. Криминология: Курс лекций. М.: Щит-М, 1999. С. 256
Petrosyan O.SH. K voprosu o ponyatii ekonomicheskoy prestupnosti: kontseptual no-metodologicheskoe issledovanie // Rossiyskiy sledovatel . 2010. № 21. S. 16 - 20.
Popov I.A. Bor ba s prestupnost yu v sfere ekonomiki: uchebnoe posobie. M.: MPGU, 2017. S.5-6.
Filosofskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar . M.: Sov. entsiklopediya, 1993. S.537.
Sutherland, Edwin H. White Collar Crime / Foreword by Donald R. Cressey. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1983. 272 p.
Жалинский А.Э. Криминологический дискурс о преступности // Право и политика. 2006. № 8.
Maksimov S.V., Matskevich I.M., Eminov V.E. Slovar kriminologicheskikh terminov // Kriminologiya. Pod red. V.N.Kudryavtseva i V.E.Eminova. M.:YUrist . 2004. S.718.
Карпец И.И. Преступность: иллюзии и реальность. М.: Российское право, 1992. С.330-331.
YAkovlev A.M. Sotsiologiya ekonomicheskoy prestupnosti. M.: Nauka, 1988. S.50-51.
Petrov E.I., Marchenko R.N., Barinova L.V. Kriminologicheskaya kharakteristika i preduprezhdenie ekonomicheskikh prestupleniy. M., 1996. S. 65.
Gurov M.P., CHebotarev S.S. Tenevaya ekonomika i ekonomicheskaya prestupnost v sisteme rynochnogo khozyaystva: Ucheb. posobie. SPb., 1997. S.17.
Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 24.05.1994 № 1016 O neotlozhnykh merakh po realizatsii Federal noy programmy Rossiyskoy Federatsii po usileniyu bor by s prestupnost yu na 1994-1995 gg. // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF 1994. 30 maya.
Saterlend E.KH. YAvlyayutsya li prestupleniya lyudey v belykh vorotnichkakh prestupleniyami // Sotsiologiya prestupnosti. M.: Progress, 1966. S. 45 - 59.
Svensson Bo. Economic crime in Sweden // Intern. Bull. of the Swed. Nat. Council on Crime Prevention. Stockholm. 1984. №1.
Аснис А.Я. Уголовная ответственность за служебные преступления в России. Проблемы законодательного закрепления и правоприменения. М.: ЮрИнфоР-Пресс, 2005. 400 с.
Яковлев А.М. Социология экономической преступности / Отв. ред. Кудрявцев В.Н. М.: Наука, 1988. 256 c.
Keywords:
Eurasian Economic Union, single economic space, economic crime, criminal legislation of the EAEU Member States, comparative analysis.