The influence of "living law" on the formation of criminal legislation
( Pp. 107-113)

The current state of criminal legislation is considered in terms of the contradictions and gaps, which take place in the text of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, as well as the difficulties arising in the process of judicial practice. One of the reasons for this is the existence of the so-called "living law", which fills certain gaps in legislation. The article considers the practice of the European Court of Human Rights in terms of assessing the actions of the subjects of the OSA when conducting private operations. The article substantiates the need for legislative regulation of the exemption from criminal liability of officials and confidants participating in various operational-search activities. Special attention is paid to prompt implementation and controlled delivery. The current Criminal Code of the Russian Federation in Chapter 8 does not contain such a circumstance excluding the criminality of the act. The grounds for not bringing such persons to criminal responsibility is the Federal Law of August 12, 1995, No. 144-FZ "On Operational Investigative Activities", which does not meet the principle of legality, an integral feature of which is a unified codification of criminal legislation. The wording of the blanket norm in Chapter 8 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is proposed with a declaration that the forced infliction of harm on interests protected by criminal law in the process of operational-search measures carried out in accordance with the Federal Law "On Operational-Search Activity" excludes the crime of the act. Such an unspecified formulation will ensure the stability of the criminal law, but it will require a thorough study and regulation of the conditions of legality and the consequences of their violation for each operational-search activity in the Federal Law "On Operational-Search Activity".

Kazakova V.A., Korableva S.Y., (2020), THE INFLUENCE OF "LIVING LAW" ON THE FORMATION OF CRIMINAL LEGISLATION. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 6 => 107-113.

Borkov V. N., Lugovik V. F. Kontroliruemoe prestuplenie: ugolovno-pravovye i operativno-rozysknye aspekty // Izvestiya AltGU. № 3 (101). S. 160-164.
Bokhan A. P. Ugolovnoe zakonodatel stvo i operativnoe vnedrenie // Problemy primeneniya ugolovnogo zakonodatel stva pri osushchestvlenii operativno-razysknoy deyatel nosti. Materialy Mezhvedomstvennogo kruglogo stola (Ryazan , 14 aprelya 2016 g.). Ryazan : Izdatel stvo Kontseptsiya , 2016. S. 30-34.
Lozhkin YU. A. Sravnitel nyy analiz operativno-rozysknogo zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Respubliki Kazakhstan (na primere operativno-rozysknogo meropriyatiya operativnoe vnedrenie ) // Aktual nye problemy i perspektivy razvitiya pravovoy sistemy Kazakhstana. Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy 110-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya ministra vnutrennikh del Kazakhskoy SSR, gosudarstvennogo i obshchestvennogo deyatelya, general-leytenanta vnutrenney sluzhby SHrakbeka Kabylbaevicha Kabylbaeva i 20-letiyu stolitsy respubliki Kazakhstan - goroda Astana. Kostanay : Kostanayskaya akademiya MVD Respubliki Kazakhstan, 2018. S. 429-432.
Masterkov A. A. Ugolovno-pravovye i kriminologicheskie aspekty provokatsionnoy deyatel nosti : avtoref. dis. kand. yur. nauk. Vladivostok, 2000. 18 c.
Sizov V. A., Meshcheryakova A. F. Problemnye voprosy i praktika ispol zovaniya pravookhranitel nymi organami operativnogo eksperimenta s uchetom Postanovleniya Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka ot 30.10.2014 Delo Nosko i Nefedov protiv Rossiyskoy Federatsii (zhaloby № 5753/09 i 11789/10) // Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Povolzhskiy region. Obshchestvennye nauki. 2015. № 4 (36). C. 66-75.
Smirnov D. V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost za sovershenie prestupleniya v usloviyakh ego provokatsii sotrudnikami pravookhranitel nykh organov // Voennoe pravo. 2017. № 1 (41). C. 350-363.
SHkabin G. S. Ugolovno-pravovoe obespechenie operativnogo vnedreniya mnografiya. Moskva : YUrisprudentsiya, 2018. 268 c.
SHCHetnev L. E., Tomilin S. M. Sovremennoe pravovoe regulirovanie osushchestvleniya operativno-rozysknogo meropriyatiya operativnoe vnedrenie : natsional nyy i mezhdunarodnyy aspekty // Vestnik Vladimirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta. 2017. № 3 (44). S. 142-146.
Bronitt S. The Law in Undercover Policing: A Comparative Study of Entrapment and Covert Interviewing in Australia, Canada and Europe // Common Law World Review. 2004. T. 33. № 1. C. 35-80.
Constantinou A. G. Harming the very people whom the law is seeking to protect The nexus between international, European Union and domestic law on human trafficking and undercover police operations // New Journal of European Criminal Law. 2017. T. 8. № 4. C. 476-495.
Ehrlich E., Rehbinder M. Grundlegung der Soziologie des Rechts. / 4 izd. Berlin : Duncker und Humblot, 1989. 439 c.
Hughes G. The use of undercover military units in counter-terrorist operations: a historical analysis with reference to contemporary anti-terrorism // Small Wars Insurgencies. 2010. T. 21. № 4. C. 561-590.
Kruisbergen E. W., Kleemans E. R., Jong D. de. Controlling Criminal Investigations: The Case of Undercover Operations // Policing. 2012. T. 6. № 4. C. 398-407.
Ross J. E. Undercover Policing and the Shifting Terms of Scholarly Debate: The United States and Europe in Counterpoint // Annual Review of Law and Social Science. 2008. T. 4. № 1. C. 239-273.
Tinto E. K. Undercover Policing, Overstated Culpability // Cardozo L. Rev. 2012. T. 34. C. 1401-1454.

causing harm during OSM, prompt implementation, controlled delivery, ECHR, circumstances excluding the criminality of the act.