Theoretical and Practical Problems of Application of the Ban of Certain Actions in the Russian Criminal Process
( Pp. 318-322)

Banning certain actions is a new and rarely used preventive measure. At the same time, high growth rates (in 2020 + 48% against last year's indicators) give hope for expanding the scope of its application. The authors propose a number of directions for improving legal regulation and the practice of applying the prohibition of certain actions. First, to fix in part 8 of Art. 105.1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation the right of the accused, to whom the prohibition of certain actions is applied, to unimpeded receipt of legal assistance from a defense lawyer. Secondly, the problem of unmotivated imposition on the accused of certain restrictions stipulated by the law was revealed. To solve it, explanations are needed from the Plenum of the RF Armed Forces and a response to each case of violation of the rights of the accused by higher authorities. Thirdly, the authors substantiate the provision that the imposition of a complex of prohibitions on the accused that significantly limit the constitutional rights to liberty and security of person is permissible only in criminal prosecution for those crimes that provide for the possibility of imposing imprisonment as a form of punishment.

Shigurova E.I., Shigurov A.V., (2021), THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL PROBLEMS OF APPLICATION OF THE BAN OF CERTAIN ACTIONS IN THE RUSSIAN CRIMINAL PROCESS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 4 => 318-322.

Apostolova N.N. Zapret opredelennykh deystviy v sisteme mer presecheniya // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2019. № 3. S. 23-25.
Bondarenko I.P. Osobennosti primeneniya kombinirovannykh mer presecheniya v kontekste vnedreniya v ugolovnyy protsess zapreta opredelennykh deystviy // Rossiyskiy sledovatel . 2021. № 1. S. 26-30.
Dannye sudebnoy statistiki Sudebnogo departamenta pri Verkhovnom Sude RF. URL: http://www.cdep.ru/index.php id 79
Dikarev I.S. Zapret opredelennykh deystviy v sisteme mer protsessual nogo prinuzhdeniya // Zakonnost . 2020. № 8. S. 50-52.
Krysin V.A., Smolin A.G., Sushkova YU.N., SHigurov A.V. Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya pravovogo statusa ponyatogo v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Problemy ekonomiki i yuridicheskoy praktiki. 2020. T. 16. № 3. S. 238-241.
Marfitsin P.G. Zapret opredelennykh deystviy: nekotorye razmyshleniya posle vvedeniya novoy mery presecheniya v ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo Rossii // Zakonnost i pravoporyadok. 2018. № 3 (19). S. 25-28.
Nasonova I.A., KHalimonenko S.S. O neobkhodimosti zapreta opredelennykh deystviy dlya sistemy mer presecheniya // Vestnik Voronezhskogo instituta MVD Rossii. 2020. № 1. S. 189-194.
Podzorov N.G., Bikeeva M.V., Sushkova YU.N. Pravovaya statistika: uchebnoe posobie. Saransk, 2018. 116 s.
Postanovlenie Balashovskogo rayonnogo suda Saratovskoy oblasti ot 27.09.2017 po delu № 3/1-1-48/2017. URL: https://bsr.sudrf.ru/bigs/show Document. html id 4 384c61427b2fccda45e709ae2e89e9b9 shard Vse dela
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 06.12.2011 № 27-P // SZ RF. 2011. № 51. St. 7552.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 16.07.2015 № 23-P // SZ RF. 2015. № 30. St. 4660.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 22.03.2018 № 12-P // SZ RF. 2018. № 14. St. 2027.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 31.01.2011 № 1-P // SZ RF. 2011. № 6. St. 897.
Postanovlenie Krasnoarmeyskogo rayonnogo suda g. Volgograda ot 10.09.2017 po delu № 3/3-14/2017. URL: https://bsr.sudrf.ru/bigs/show Document.html id 4 e6 1152d0ff1ab2169ce5021991595186 shard Vse dela
Postanovlenie Kungurskogo gorodskogo suda Permskogo kraya ot 16.04.2016 po delu № 3/1-57/2016. URL: https://bsr.sudrf.ru/bigs/show Document.html id d6a24f54 d779e9b6de565dc3066c4922 shard Vse dela
Postanovlenie Saratovskogo oblastnogo suda ot 4.10.2018 po delu № 3/11-5/2018. URL: https://bsr.sudrf. ru/bigs/showDocument.html id 4 a842b716b7c 7fee884d7e2fe745dc9d8 shard Vse dela
Postanovlenie Tarumovskogo rayonnogo suda Respubliki Dagestan ot 7.10.2016 po delu № 3/3-5/2016 URL: https://bsr.sudrf.ru/bigs/showDocument.html id 401 af85b0d6a3717c68bcbfd70e1c289 shard Vse dela
Postanovlenie Engel sskogo rayonnogo suda Saratovskoy oblasti ot 7.08.2018 po delu № 3/12-7/2018 URL: https://bsr.sudrf.ru/bigs/showDocu ment.html id 4 cbe13c39673b02518e6b125287234186 shard Vse dela
Ryabinina T.K., Snegireva D.E. O nekotorykh problemnykh aspektakh primeneniya novoy mery presecheniya - zapreta opredelennykh deystviy // Mirovoy sud ya. 2018. № 12. S. 25-32.
Sushkova YU.N. YUridicheskiy fakul tet Natsional no-issledovatel skogo Mordovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. N.P. Ogareva // Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn . 2011. № 3. S. 71-76.
YAkovleva S.A., Kutyanina A.S. Problemy sootnosheniya zapreta opredelennykh deystviy s drugimi merami ugolovno-protsessual nogo presecheniya // Vestnik Mariyskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya Istoricheskie nauki. YUridicheskie nauki . 2019. T. 5. № 1. S. 90-95.

preventive measure, prohibition of certain actions, problem, practice, accused.