Differentiated Treatment of the Distinction Between "Terrorism" and "Extremism" in Criminal Law
( Pp. 71-74)

The purpose of this study was to consider the distinction between the concepts of "terrorism" and "extremism." Differentiation of these concepts reveal their general and distinctive characteristics. Although most researchers use these concepts in synonymous order, we have tried to investigate various objects and the different nature of their social danger. The objectives of the study are to analyze the content of the concepts of "terrorism" and "extremism," as well as the orientation and motives pursued by these crimes. Conclusions: in the framework of the study, we conclude that the orientation of extremist activity is to develop means and methods of opposing the existing foundations, to fight in defense of their critical views, as well as to reject any compromises. Extremism in its manifestation is guided by calls for the choice of radical measures to achieve its goals, which are aimed at changing the content of political institutions. In determining the orientation of terrorist activities, we note the existence of specific motives and goals inherent in these crimes. The nature of terrorism is constituted by the violent influence of radical political groups and their adherents and followers on the consciousness of the masses and the structure of the authorities to advance, including by force, their ideology.

Tkhagalegov A.A., (2021), DIFFERENTIATED TREATMENT OF THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN "TERRORISM" AND "EXTREMISM" IN CRIMINAL LAW. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 4 => 71-74.

Federal nyy zakon O protivodeystvii ekstremistskoy deyatel nosti ot 25.07.2002 N 114-FZ Elektronnyy resurs // Rezhim dostupa: http://www.consultant. ru/document/cons doc LAW 37867/
Federal nyy zakon O protivodeystvii terrorizmu ot 06.03.2006 N 35-FZ Elektronnyy resurs // Rezhim dostupa: http://www.consultant.ru/document/ cons doc LAW 58840/
Federal nyy zakon O vnesenii izmeneniy v otdel nye zakonodatel nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 05.05.2014 № 130-FZ Elektronnyy resurs // Rezhim dostupa: http://www.consultant.ru/document/ cons doc LAW 162576/
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13.06.1996 № 63-FZ Elektronnyy resurs // Rezhim dostupa: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons doc LAW 10699/
Bzhiev R.B. Terrorizm i ekstremizm: sovremennoe ponimanie i aktual nye problemy protivodeystviya // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2017. №3. S. 29-31.
Maystrenko G.A. Problema razgranicheniya ponyatiy quot;terrorizm quot; i quot;ekstremizm quot; v zakonodatel stve Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba i kadry. 2019. № 4. S. 132-135.
Mashekuasheva M.KH., Kochesokova Z.KH. Nekotorye voprosy sootnosheniya ponyatiy quot;ekstremizm quot; i quot;terrorizm quot; v kontekste protivodeystviya na sovremennom etape // Problemy ekonomiki i yuridicheskoy praktiki. 2019. T. 15. № 3. S. 28-30.
Mozhegova A.A. O razgranichenii ekstremistskikh i terroristicheskikh prestupleniy po ugolovnomu pravu Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Biznes v zakone. Ekonomiko-yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2014. № 3. S. 52-55.
Frolov M.G. K voprosu o razgranichenii ponyatiy quot;ekstremizm quot; i quot;terrorizm quot; // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. 2017. № 5. S. 165-168.
SHkhagapsoev Z.L., Tarchokov B.A. O klyuchevykh faktorakh, sposobstvuyushchikh vyrabotke effektivnykh mekhanizmov protivodeystviya mezhdunarodnomu terrorizmu // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2018. № 3. S. 20-21.

terrorism, extremism, motive of crime, characterization of crime.