SEPARATE PROBLEMS OF INTERPRETATION OF PROVISIONS OF THE CRIMINAL LAW ON EXCESS OF LIMITS OF NECESSARY DEFENSE IN LAW-ENFORCEMENT PRACTICE
( Pp. 236-239)
More about authors
Reshnyak Mariya Genrikhovna
Cand.Sci.(Law), Associate Professor, associate professor of Department of Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics
Moscow State University of International Relations (MGIMO-University)
Moscow, Russia
Moscow State University of International Relations (MGIMO-University)
Moscow, Russia
Abstract:
The article is devoted to one of the most difficult aspects of the Institute of necessary defense - criminal liability for exceeding its limits. The author focuses on some issues of interpretation of the current criminal law governing this institution, in terms of its application in practice to persons who acted in a state of necessary defense, but exceeded its limits. The article takes into account the current explanations of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, the positions of scientists, judicial statistics and examples from judicial practice. According to the results of the study, the author formulates conclusions aimed at improving the practice of the Institute of necessary defense. The author notes, in connection with the existing problems of application of the provisions of the criminal code on the necessary defense and other circumstances precluding the crime, the need for publication by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of a review of relevant judicial practice. According to the results of the study, the author formulated conclusions aimed at improving the practice of the Institute of necessary defense, justified the need to Supplement the resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation № 19, proposed a new version of paragraph 14 of the said resolution.
How to Cite:
Reshnyak M.G., (2019), SEPARATE PROBLEMS OF INTERPRETATION OF PROVISIONS OF THE CRIMINAL LAW ON EXCESS OF LIMITS OF NECESSARY DEFENSE IN LAW-ENFORCEMENT PRACTICE. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 3 => 236-239.
Reference list:
Federal nyy zakon ot 21 iyulya 2014 g. N 227-FZ O vnesenii izmeneniy v otdel nye zakonodatel nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii v svyazi s sovershenstvovaniem zakonodatel stva ob oborote oruzhiya // SZ RF. 2014. № 30 (ch. I). St. 4228.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda SSSR ot 23 oktyabrya 1956 g. № 8 O nedostatkakh sudebnoy praktiki po delam, svyazannym s primeneniem zakonodatel stva o neobkhodimoy oborone
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 27 sentyabrya 2012 g. № 19 O primenenii sudami zakonodatel stva o neobkhodimoy oborone i prichinenii vreda pri zaderzhanii litsa, sovershivshego prestuplenie // Sayt Verkhovnogo Suda RF: URL: http://www.vsrf.ru/documents/own/8306/ (data obrashcheniya: 30.03.2019).
Postanovlenie prezidiuma Moskovskogo oblastnogo suda ot 5 sentyabrya 2018 g. № 382 po ugolovnomu delu № 44u-181/18 // Arkhiv Moskovskogo oblastnogo suda za 2018 god.
Avdeeva, E.V. Neobkhodimaya oborona: aktual nye voprosy zakonodatel noy reglamentatsii i pravoprimeneniya /E.V. Avdeeva// Rossiyskiy sud ya. - 2019. - № 1. - S. 16-20.
Borisov S.V., Dayshutov M.M., Dmitrenko A.P., Russkevich E.A. Usloviya i predely pravomernosti neobkhodimoy oborony: problemy teorii i praktiki: uchebnoe posobie /Borisov S.V. i dr. - M.: Moskovskiy universitet MVD Rossii imeni V.YA. Kikotya, 2018. - 89 s.
Vorob eva N.A. Problemy primeneniya zakonodatel stva o neobkhodimoy oborone /N.A. Vorob eva // Sovremennoe pravo. - 2018. - № 5. - S. 88-89.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda SSSR ot 4 dekabrya 1969 g. № 11 O praktike primeneniya sudami zakonodatel stva o neobkhodimoy oborone , Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda SSSR 16 avgusta 1984 g. № 14 O primenenii sudami zakonodatel stva, obespechivayushchego pravo na neobkhodimuyu oboronu ot obshchestvenno opasnykh posyagatel stv // SPS Konsul tantPlyus .
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda SSSR ot 23 oktyabrya 1956 g. № 8 O nedostatkakh sudebnoy praktiki po delam, svyazannym s primeneniem zakonodatel stva o neobkhodimoy oborone
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 27 sentyabrya 2012 g. № 19 O primenenii sudami zakonodatel stva o neobkhodimoy oborone i prichinenii vreda pri zaderzhanii litsa, sovershivshego prestuplenie // Sayt Verkhovnogo Suda RF: URL: http://www.vsrf.ru/documents/own/8306/ (data obrashcheniya: 30.03.2019).
Postanovlenie prezidiuma Moskovskogo oblastnogo suda ot 5 sentyabrya 2018 g. № 382 po ugolovnomu delu № 44u-181/18 // Arkhiv Moskovskogo oblastnogo suda za 2018 god.
Avdeeva, E.V. Neobkhodimaya oborona: aktual nye voprosy zakonodatel noy reglamentatsii i pravoprimeneniya /E.V. Avdeeva// Rossiyskiy sud ya. - 2019. - № 1. - S. 16-20.
Borisov S.V., Dayshutov M.M., Dmitrenko A.P., Russkevich E.A. Usloviya i predely pravomernosti neobkhodimoy oborony: problemy teorii i praktiki: uchebnoe posobie /Borisov S.V. i dr. - M.: Moskovskiy universitet MVD Rossii imeni V.YA. Kikotya, 2018. - 89 s.
Vorob eva N.A. Problemy primeneniya zakonodatel stva o neobkhodimoy oborone /N.A. Vorob eva // Sovremennoe pravo. - 2018. - № 5. - S. 88-89.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda SSSR ot 4 dekabrya 1969 g. № 11 O praktike primeneniya sudami zakonodatel stva o neobkhodimoy oborone , Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda SSSR 16 avgusta 1984 g. № 14 O primenenii sudami zakonodatel stva, obespechivayushchego pravo na neobkhodimuyu oboronu ot obshchestvenno opasnykh posyagatel stv // SPS Konsul tantPlyus .
