Some questions of differentiation of objects of criminalistic explosion
( Pp. 197-200)

More about authors
Victoria A. Gauzhaeva Cand.Sci. (Law), associate professor of special and technical training department; North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia; Russia
North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia; Nalchik
; Russia. Omsk Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, Omsk, Russia Zaurbi L. Shkhagapsoev Dr. Sci. (Law), Prof., Rector
Kabardino-Balkarian State Agrarian University named after V. M. Kokov
Nalchik, Russian Federation
Abstract:
The purpose of this article is to summarize modern data on the concept of explosives and explosive devices as one of the objects of limited turnover; signs indicating that the object belongs to the goals in one of the categories: initiating, brisant and throwing actions, as well as about the manufacturing methods and other grounds for its division. The main signs of explosives are highlighted: explosiveness, brisance and sensitivity. To solve this problem, on the basis of the classification given in the work, a comparative legal analysis of the definitions is carried out, the effect of the type of detected, seized, used weapon on the qualification of acts, a comparison of some tactical and technical characteristics of explosives and explosive devices that are important for determining their place in the system. With regard to explosive devices, the article also provides a generalized classification according to the method of manufacture for home-made and factory; and depending on the targets for military and industrial substances, as well as parts of standard explosive devices and varieties of these parts. The results of such a generalization can be used for further theoretical research, the preparation of scientific papers and for solving practical problems in the field of generating special knowledge of a police officer, in particular, determining tactics for detecting and seizing explosives and explosive devices, prohibitions and restrictions related to ensuring personal safety; comparisons with classification features, which allows to delimit the samples among themselves and determine the further mechanism for conducting preliminary research and bringing to responsibility a certain type.
How to Cite:
Victoria A.G., Zaurbi L.S., (2020), SOME QUESTIONS OF DIFFERENTIATION OF OBJECTS OF CRIMINALISTIC EXPLOSION. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 2 => 197-200.
Reference list:
O politsii: feder. zakon ot 7 fevr. 2011 g. № 3-FZ (red. ot 27.12.2019) // Sobr. zakonodatel stva RF. - 2011. - № 7. - St. 900.
Belyakov A.A. Kriminalisticheskoe vzryvovedenie kak teoriya vyyavleniya i rassledovaniya prestupleniy, svyazannykh so vzryvami // Voprosy rossiyskoy yustitsii. - 2015. - № 1(1). - S. 16-18.
Varchenko I.A., Kolotushkin S.M., Safonov A.A. Tekhniko-kriminalisticheskoe obespechenie rassledovaniya prestupleniy, svyazannykh so vzryvom: ucheb. posobie. - Krasnodar: Akademiya znaniy, 2016. - 133 s.
Gauzhaeva V.A. Osnovnye kharakteristiki vzryvchatykh veshchestv, ikh znachenie i ispol zovanie pri presechenii i raskrytii prestupleniy, svyazannykh s kriminal nymi vzryvami // Vestnik Tyumenskogo instituta povysheniya kvalifikatsii sotrudnikov MVD Rossii. - 2014. - № 3. - S. 171-175.
Gauzhaeva V.A. Osobennosti deystviya sotrudnikov pravookhranitel nykh organov pri poluchenii soobshcheniy ob ugroze vzryva ili obnaruzhenii vzryvnogo ustroystva // Aktual nye problemy sovremennogo rossiyskogo prava: materialy VIII Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. (Nevinomysk, 23-24 iyunya 2016 g.). - Nevinnomyssk: Nevinnomysskiy gosudarstvennyy gumanitarno-tekhnicheskiy institut, 2016. - S. 160-166.
Dil din YU.M., Martynov V.V., Semenov A.YU., Stetskevich A.D. Mesto vzryva kak ob ekt kriminalisticheskogo issledovaniya: ucheb. posobie. - M.: VNII MVD Rossii, 1995. - S. 5.
Klyzbaeva V.A. Algoritm bezopasnogo povedeniya sotrudnikov organov vnutrennikh del pri obnaruzhenii vzryvchatykh i vzryvoopasnykh veshchestv, vzryvnykh ustroystv // Vestnik Ufimskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii. 2016. № 1 (71). S. 81-84.
Men shikov M.D. Sovremennoe sostoyanie zakonodatel stva v sfere nezakonnogo oborota oruzhiya, boepripasov, vzryvchatykh veshchestv i vzryvnykh ustroystv // Vestnik nauki. 2019. T. 2. № 1 (10). S. 71-81.
O sudebnoy praktike po delam o khishchenii, vymogatel stve i nezakonnom oborote oruzhiya, boepripasov, vzryvchatykh veshchestv i vzryvnykh ustroystv: postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 12 marta 2002 g. № 5 (red. ot 03.12.2013) // Byul. Verkhovnogo Suda RF. - 2002. - № 5.
Otarov A.A., Kardanov R.R., Kangezov M.R. Praktikum po osnovam kriminalisticheskoy tekhniki: ucheb.-metod. posobie. - Nal chik: Print TSentr, 2016. - S. 78.
Ofitsial nyy sayt MVD Rossii. Sostoyanie prestupnosti. - Rezhim dostupa: https://mvd.rf/reports/ (data obrashcheniya: 12.02.2020).
Panasenko N.A. Ispol zovanie nauchno-tekhnicheskikh sredstv dlya obnaruzheniya vzryvnykh ustroystv, vzryvchatykh veshchestv i sledov ikh primeneniya // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2019. № 4. S. 187-191.
Keywords:
explosives, explosive devices, forensic explosives, explosion.