TYPICAL SUBJECTS OF APPROPRIATION AND EMBEZZLEMENT, COMMITTED IN THE RUSSIAN FINANCIAL AND CREDIT SPHERE
( Pp. 244-248)

The subjects of misappropriation and embezzlement in the banking sector are traditionally referred to as the so-called white-collar crime. The Russian angle law and criminological doctrine is dominated by the position that the legislator took. It consists of dividing into two categories of persons performing managerial functions (conditionally - «managers»). These are officials and managers in corporate and other organizations. These individuals can appropriate and waste entrusted property, around the understanding of which there is a discussion. A typical subject of a crime under Part 1 of Art. 160 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is an employee of the bank, to whom, on a special assignment or contract of material liability, as well as by virtue of a service contract, money has been transferred to the bank (its customers), in addition to officials, as well as bank managers. Thus, the liability under Part 2 of Art. 160 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, it is possible to attract not only bank officials, but also its managers, since the property of the bank and customers (depositors) are actually under their management, and in some cases they are temporarily at their disposal.

Gorbunova S.E., (2020), TYPICAL SUBJECTS OF APPROPRIATION AND EMBEZZLEMENT, COMMITTED IN THE RUSSIAN FINANCIAL AND CREDIT SPHERE. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 2 => 244-248.

Sevryukov A.P. Priznaki spetsial nogo sub ekta prisvoeniya i rastraty// Rossiyskiy sledovatel . - 2010. - №6. - S. 23-26.
Belokurov O.V. Otvetstvennost za khishcheniya, sovershennye putem prisvoeniya, rastraty ili zloupotrebleniya sluzhebnym polozheniem: dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. - M.: MGU, 1991. - S. 84 - 87.
Bakradze A.A. Prisvoenie i rastrata - prestupleniya, podryvayushchie okazannoe doverie. M.: Akademiya ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti MVD RF, 2007. - 138 s.
Borzenkov G.N. Kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Gl. 21. Pod red. V.I. Radchenko. - M.: NORMA, 2005. - 379 s.
Getman T.A. Kompetentsii, urovni i polnomochiya dolzhnostnykh lits banka, prinimayushchikh kreditnye resheniya// Aktual nye voprosy ekonomicheskikh nauk. - 2010. - № 14. - S. 315-320.
Lyapunov YU.I. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1988. № 2. S. 78-85.
Piontkovskiy A.A. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo prava. V shesti tomakh. T. V. M.: Nauka, 1971. 518 s.
Eriashvili N.D. Ob ektivnye priznaki prisvoeniya i rastraty// Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2015. - №9. - S. 227-236.
Eliseev S.A. Prestupleniya protiv sobstvennosti po ugolovnomu zakonodatel stvu Rossii. - Tomsk, 2000. - S. 111, 172 - 173.
KHabarov A.V. Prestupleniya protiv sobstvennosti: vliyanie grazhdansko-pravovogo regulirovaniya: avtoref. dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. - Tyumen , 1999. 23 s.
Nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii: v 2 tomakh. T. 1. - M. 2013. 382 s.
Kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii/ Pod red. V.I. Radchenko. M., 2009. 377 s.
Vorob eva I.V. Spornye voprosy po ponyatiyu sub ekta prisvoeniya i rastraty// Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2015. - № 1. - S. 166-168.
Kochoi S.M. Otvetstvennost za korystnye prestupleniya protiv sobstvennosti. - M., 2000. - S. 196-197.
Gaukhman L.D. Kvalifikatsiya prestupleniy: zakon, teoriya, praktika. M.: AO TSentr YUrInfoR , 2010.
Postanovlenie Mintruda RF ot 31 dekabrya 2002 g. № 85.
Tomkovich R.R. Otvetstvennost za ushcherb, prichinennyy banku rabotnikom pri osushchestvlenii raschetov// Pravo.by. 2016. № 3 (41). S. 137-141.
Plokhova V.I. Nenasil stvennye prestupleniya protiv sobstvennosti. SPb.: YUTS Press, 2003. S. 270 - 280.
Garifullina, R.F. K voprosu o razgranichenii prisvoeniya i rastraty, sovershennykh litsom s ispol zovaniem svoego sluzhebnogo polozheniya, ot zloupotrebleniya polnomochiyami, a takzhe ot zloupotrebleniya dolzhnostnymi polnomochiyami/ R.F. Garifullina, T.V. Nikolaeva, E.R. KHakimova// CHernye dyry v Rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2010. № 5. S. 89-91.
Utv. postanovleniem Mintruda RF ot 31 dekabrya 2002 g. № 85.
Argumenty i fakty. 2019. 5 iyulya https://aif.ru/money/mymoney/s millionami v bega kak bankovskie kassiry voruyut dengi
RIA Novosti. 2019. 7 sentyabrya https://ria.ru/20190709/1556356702.html
Gorelik A.S. Prestupleniya v sfere ekonomicheskoy deyatel nosti i protiv interesov sluzhby v kommercheskikh ili inykh organizatsiyakh. Krasnoyarsk, 1998. S. 157;
Уголовное право. Особенная часть: Учебник для вузов / Отв. ред. И.Я. Козаченко, 3.А. Незнамова, Г.П. Новоселов. М.: НОРМА.
Jordi Trullen, Jean M. Bartunek The Virtue of Prudence. P. 93.
Postanovlenie Plenum Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii v postanovlenii ot 27 dekabrya 2007 goda № 51 O sudebnoy praktike po delam o moshennichestve, prisvoenii i rastrate //Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2008. 12 yanvarya.

misappropriation, embezzlement, embezzlement, bank, financial institution.