Detention, as a measure of procedural coercion and difficulties associated with the detention of a suspect (accused)
( Pp. 281-284)
More about authors
Liana U. Kanokova
Teacher department of Law Enforcement, Russia
North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia; Nalchik
; Russia. Barnaul Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, Barnaul, Russia
North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia; Nalchik
; Russia. Barnaul Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, Barnaul, Russia
Abstract:
The author considers the legal consequences of detention as a measure of procedural compulsion, and the problems associated with the detention of a suspect (accused). Based on the norms of the criminal procedure code of the Russian Federation, from the moment of practical detention, a person does not automatically acquire the full status of a suspect. This status is granted to a person only if an authorized official issues a procedural act in the form of a report on the suspect's detention, which should be considered his actual detention. At the same time, in practice, the rights and freedoms of a suspect are restricted until the moment of actual detention, which creates significant difficulties for compliance with the norms of criminal procedure legislation by officials conducting preliminary investigations. These restrictions also affect the right to freedom and personal integrity of the detained person, as well as the right to protection
How to Cite:
Liana U.K., (2020), DETENTION, AS A MEASURE OF PROCEDURAL COERCION AND DIFFICULTIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE DETENTION OF A SUSPECT (ACCUSED). Gaps in Russian Legislation, 4 => 281-284.
Reference list:
Abdykulov A.A., Asylbekov A.A., Posylaev S.A. Mesto ugolovno-protsessual nogo zaderzhaniya v sisteme mer ugolovno-protsessual nogo prinuzhdeniya // Vestnik KRSU. 2013. Tom 13. № 5. S. 77.
Vershinina S.I. O yuridicheskoy prirode, ponyatii i sisteme ugolovno-protsessual nogo prinuzhdeniya // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2016. №5 (233). S. 90.
Zaderzhali s polichnym na meste prestupleniya Elektronnyy resurs - Rezhim dostupa: http://petrograff.ru/zaderzhali-s-polichny-m-na-meste-prestupleniya/ (data obrashcheniya: 07.04. 2020).
Mel nikov V.YU. Obespechenie i zashchita prav cheloveka pri primenenii mer protsessual nogo prinuzhdeniya v dosudebnom proizvodstve Rossiyskoy Federatsii: monogr., M.: YUrditinform, 2014. S. 119.
Ol shevskiy A.V. Zaderzhanie podozrevaemogo kak mera ugolovno-protsessual nogo prinuzhdeniya: dis. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2006. S.9.
Otorochkin S.N. Ponyatie i soderzhanie mer protsessual nogo prinuzhdeniya v ugolovnom protsesse Elektronnyy resurs - Rezhim dostupa: http://forum-nauka.ru/domains data/files/3/Otorochkin 20S.N. 20.pdf (data obrashcheniya 06.04. 2020).
Rossinskiy S.B. Diskussiya o sushchnosti i pravovoy prirode zaderzhaniya podozrevaemogo prodolzhaetsya // Aktual nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2018. №6 (91). S. 135.
Ryzhakov A. P., CHernova S.S. Ugolovnyy protsess Rossii: kurs lektsiy. SPb.: Piter, 2009. S. 186.
SHepelyeva O.R., Kievskiy V.V. Problemy realizatsii prav podozrevaemogo pri zaderzhanii // Leningradskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2017. № 2. S. 194-196.
Vershinina S.I. O yuridicheskoy prirode, ponyatii i sisteme ugolovno-protsessual nogo prinuzhdeniya // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2016. №5 (233). S. 90.
Zaderzhali s polichnym na meste prestupleniya Elektronnyy resurs - Rezhim dostupa: http://petrograff.ru/zaderzhali-s-polichny-m-na-meste-prestupleniya/ (data obrashcheniya: 07.04. 2020).
Mel nikov V.YU. Obespechenie i zashchita prav cheloveka pri primenenii mer protsessual nogo prinuzhdeniya v dosudebnom proizvodstve Rossiyskoy Federatsii: monogr., M.: YUrditinform, 2014. S. 119.
Ol shevskiy A.V. Zaderzhanie podozrevaemogo kak mera ugolovno-protsessual nogo prinuzhdeniya: dis. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2006. S.9.
Otorochkin S.N. Ponyatie i soderzhanie mer protsessual nogo prinuzhdeniya v ugolovnom protsesse Elektronnyy resurs - Rezhim dostupa: http://forum-nauka.ru/domains data/files/3/Otorochkin 20S.N. 20.pdf (data obrashcheniya 06.04. 2020).
Rossinskiy S.B. Diskussiya o sushchnosti i pravovoy prirode zaderzhaniya podozrevaemogo prodolzhaetsya // Aktual nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2018. №6 (91). S. 135.
Ryzhakov A. P., CHernova S.S. Ugolovnyy protsess Rossii: kurs lektsiy. SPb.: Piter, 2009. S. 186.
SHepelyeva O.R., Kievskiy V.V. Problemy realizatsii prav podozrevaemogo pri zaderzhanii // Leningradskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2017. № 2. S. 194-196.
Keywords:
suspect, detention, preventive measure, remand in custody, other measures of procedural compulsion.
