Protecting Anti-Corruption Whistleblowers: Historical and Comparative Legal Aspects
( Pp. 134-139)

More about authors
Lev R. Klebanov Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor, Professor of the Department of Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics at the Law Institute
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba
Moscow, Russian Federation Maria I. Kutovaya postgraduate student, Department of Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics at the Law Institute
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba
Moscow, Russian Federation
Abstract:
The article explores the historical-legal and comparative legal problems of assessing the actions of persons who voluntarily report corruption (from Roman traditions and the Middle Ages to modern legislation in various countries). Using the examples of «actio popularis» and «qui tam», the analysis demonstrates how the idea of encouraging citizens to report offenses—while simultaneously shielding them from false accusations and unjust pressure—developed historically. The core question is whether current legal frameworks and public institutions adequately protect those who decide to expose corruption. Detailed attention is given to issues such as informants’ anonymity and potential rewards, alongside the dangers of abuse in the absence of proper oversight. The study also highlights international experience (e.g., in the United Kingdom, the United States, and several Asian countries) and examines the work of specialized agencies such as the Serious Fraud Office (SFO), which handles large-scale financial crime investigations. Such a system enhances trust in governmental institutions, helps curb corruption, and lays the groundwork for a more stable and equitable society.
How to Cite:
Klebanov L. R., Kutovaya M. I. Protecting Anti-Corruption Whistleblowers: Historical and Comparative Legal Aspects // ECONOMIC PROBLEMS AND LEGAL PRACTICE. 2025. Vol. 21. № 2. P. 134-139. (in Russ.) DOI: 10.33693/2541-8025-2025-21-2-134-139. EDN: KOPPAM
Reference list:
Ganshina V. L., Shanskij N. M. Etymological dictionary of the Russian language.M.: Prosveshhenie, 1985. PP. 115–144.
Grincer P. A. Public and private in Roman law. Herald of Ancient History. 1990. N 1. PP. 45-56.
Kistjakovskij A. F. Experiments in the history of criminal procedure. SPb.:Typography of Y. N. Ehrlich, 1876. PP. 128–137.
Trevor-Roper H. R. Europe at the time of the witch hunts.M.: Centrpoligraf. 2002. PP. 247–260.
Covington R. A. (2001) The False Claims Act and Its Impact on Federal Contracting // Harvard Law Review. Vol. 114, № 7. РР. 2157–2175.
James B. Helmer Jr., (2013) False Claims Act: Incentivizing Integrity for 150 Years for Rogues, Privateers, Parasites and Patriots, 81 U. Cin. L. Rev. University of Cincinnati Law Review, Vol. 81, Iss. 4 Art. 3
Joseph JN, et al. (2009) Enforcement Related to Off-Label Marketing and Use of Drugs and Devices: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going?Archived 2016-03-04 at the Wayback MachineJournal of Health & Life Sciences Law. Vol.2 Issue 2. PP. 73–108. January.
Lewis D. (2001) Whistleblowing at Work: Enhancing the Protection of Employees». Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. РР. 432–456.
Keywords:
reporting corruption offenses, voluntary whistleblowers, whistleblower protection, remuneration, financial investigations..


Related Articles

7. Employment Law; Right to social security Pages: 86-89 Issue №15447
THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION IS A SOCIAL STATE. IS THAT SO?
social state social rights guarantees labor protection pensions
Show more
REGIONAL AND SECTORAL ECONOMICS Pages: 170-175 Issue №46133
Particularities of Remuneration of Medical Workers in Continental European Countries
remuneration foreign experience medical worker France Germany
Show more