MODERNIZATION PARADIGM IN STUDYING THE HISTORY OF RUSSIA: PROBLEMS AND DISCUSSIONS
( Pp. 19-27)

More about authors
Andrey V. Speransky Dr. Sci. (Hist.), Professor, Honored Worker of Science of the Russian Federation, Head of Center for Political and Socio-Cultural History
Institute of History and Archeology of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation Peter A. Speransky
Institute of History and Archeology of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin
Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation; Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation
Abstract:
The paper gives a conceptual historiographical analysis of research works examining the history of Russia from a stand-point of theory of modernization. The paper notes diversity and plurality of perception of this methodological paradigm by domestic and foreign researchers.The paper indicates that representatives of Western modernization historiosophy, recognizing transition of Russia from traditional to modern society, attribute it to the second wave of modernization, characterized by partial and conservative transformations. In their opinion, the influence of exogenous factor based on Westernization was largely neutralized by the strength of endogenous traditionalist foundation, which rejected innovations introduced from the outside.The paper concludes that use of Western historiosophy by Russian researchers has led to the creation of two opposite interpretive models of understanding Russian modernization -“pessimistic” and“optimistic”. The paper shows that the first one representing Russian modernization as a kind of anti-rational and ineffective attempt to reach the level of advanced European societies still prevails in value judgments. At the same time, the second one is gaining strength. The latter based on the conclusions that even under the conditions of “lateness” and “secondariness” modernization transformations in Russia led to positive results, stimulating development of market relations, formation of different kinds of private property, establishment offoundations of civil society as well as institutions of the state of law.
How to Cite:
Andrey V.S., Peter A.S., (2019), MODERNIZATION PARADIGM IN STUDYING THE HISTORY OF RUSSIA: PROBLEMS AND DISCUSSIONS. History and Modern Perspectives, 3 => 19-27.
Reference list:
Alaev L.B. Modernizatsiya ili opora na sobstvennye slabosti // TSivilizatsii. Vyp. 10. S. 31-51.
Alekseeva E.V. Diffuziya evropeyskikh innovatsiy v Rossii (XVII - nachalo XX v.). M.: Rossiyskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya (ROSSPEN), 2007. 368 s.
Akhiezer A.S. Rossiya: kritika istoricheskogo opyta. T. 1. Novosibirsk: Sibirskiy khronograf, 1991. 804 s.
Gavrov S.N. Modernizatsiya vo imya imperii. Sotsiokul turnye aspekty modernizatsionnykh protsessov v Rossii. M.: Editorial URSS, 2004. 352 s.
Kerov V.V. Se chelovek i delo ego Konfessional no-eticheskie faktory staroobryadcheskogo predprinimatel stva v Rossii. M.: Ekon-inform, 2004. 654 c.
Krasil shchikov V.A. Vdogonku za proshedshim vekom. Razvitie Rossii v XX veke s tochki zreniya mirovykh modernizatsiy. M.: Rossiyskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya (ROSSPEN), 1998. 264 s.
Mironov B.N. Sotsial naya istoriya Rossii perioda imperii (XVIII - nachalo XX v.). Genezis lichnosti, demokraticheskoy sem i, grazhdanskogo obshchestva i pravovogo gosudarstva. V 2-kh t. SPb.: Dmitriy Bulanin, 1999.
Mukhin O.N. Bol she modernov, khoroshikh i raznykh : spetsifika modernizatsii v nezapadnykh obshchestvakh (problemy teorii) // TSivilizatsii. 2015. Vyp. 10. S. 16-30.
Naumova N.F. Retsidiviruyushchaya modernizatsiya v Rossii: vina, beda ili resurs chelovechestva M.: Editorial URSS, 1999. 174 s.
Oblonskiy A.V. Drama politicheskoy istorii: sistema protiv lichnosti. M.: In-t gosudarstva i prava, 1994. 352 s.
Poberezhnikov I.V. Perekhod ot traditsionnogo k industrial nomu obshchestvu. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie problemy modernizatsii. M.: Rossiyskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya (ROSSPEN) 2006. 240 s.
Poberezhnikov I.V. Paradigma modernizatsii v istoricheskom issledovanii // Ural v modernizatsionnoy dinamike KHKH veka. Ekaterinburg, 2015. S. 197-214.
Proskuryakova N.A. Vlast i reformy v Rossii v XIX veke v kontekste modernizatsionnogo podkhoda // Problemy metodologii otechestvennoy istorii i kul turologii: Materialy konf. Nauchnoe mirovozzrenie i perspektivy ego razvitiya . M., 2009. S. 2-16.
Rossiyskaya modernizatsiya: problemy i perspektivy (materialy kruglogo stola) // Voprosy filosofii. 1993. № 7. S. 3-39.
Semennikova L.I. Rossiya v mirovom soobshchestve tsivilizatsiy. Bryansk: Kursiv, 2000. 539 s.
Sogrin V.V. Klioterapiya i istoricheskaya real nost : test na sovremennost // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost . 2002. № 1. S. 144-160.
Speranskiy A.V. Rossiyskaya modernizatsiya v kontekste protivorechiy obshchestva i vlasti: istoriograficheskiy aspekt // TSivilizatsionnoe svoeobrazie rossiyskikh modernizatsiy: regional noe izmerenie. Ekaterinburg, 2009. S. 309-317.
Speranskiy A.V. Rossiya i modernizatsiya: istoriosofskiy aspekt problemy // Ural industrial nyy: Bakuninskie chteniya. Ekaterinburg, 2011. S. 58-70.
Speranskiy A.V. Modernizatsiya v Rossii: perekrestok mneniy // Modernizatsiya v usloviyakh osvoeniya vostochnykh regionov Rossii v XVIII-XX vv. Ekaterinburg, 2012. S. 27-39.
KHoros V.G. Russkaya istoriya v sravnitel nom osveshchenii. M.: Aspekt-Press, 1996. 176 s.
Black C.E. The Dynamics of Modernization: A Study in Comparative History. New York: Harper Colophon Books, 1975. 352 p.
Gerchenkron A. Economic Backwardness in historical Perspective. Cambridge, 1962. 456 p.
Moore B. Jr. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Boston, 1966. 559 p.
Therborn G. European Modernity and Beyond: The Trajectory of European Societies, 1945-2000. London: New Delhi, 1995. 497 p.