Methodological aspects of the study of the correlation of interests with the norms of morality and their reflection in Russian society
( Pp. 17-21)

The article is devoted to the combination of the legitimate interests of morality and expediency of an integrated methodological approach that allows to analyze the scientific knowledge of the subject under study and synthesize knowledge about the legal interest in the various stages of its development in specific historical conditions and contemporary Russian society.

Lysuho S.V., (2013), METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF THE STUDY OF THE CORRELATION OF INTERESTS WITH THE NORMS OF MORALITY AND THEIR REFLECTION IN RUSSIAN SOCIETY. Business in Law, 4 => 17-21.

Lapach V. A. Sistema ob ektov grazhdanskikh prav: teoriya i sudebnaya praktika. M, 2004, S.14.
Alekseev S.S. Samoe svyatoe, chto est u Boga na zemle. Immanuil Kant i problemy prava v sovremennuyu epokhu. M., Izdatel stvo NORMA, 1998. S.144.
Vitushko V.A. Obshchenauchnaya metodologiya v tsivilistike // Ros. pravo. 2000. № 3. S.54-60;
Pelipenko A.A. Metodologiya analiza i problemy rossiyskoy gosudarstvennosti // Obshch. nauki i sovremennost . 2000. № 5. S.104-110 i dr.
Nazarenko G. Metodologiya pravopoznaniya // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2002. № 4. S. 93-94.
Lomovskiy V.D. O metode konstitutsionnogo regulirovaniya // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 1998. № 4-5. S.91-98.
Sersenov K.M. Issledovanie problemy gosudarstvennogo prinuzhdeniya v rossiyskoy yuridicheskoy nauke // Istoriya gosudarstva i prava. 1999. № 1-2. S.15-17.
Primenenie etogo metoda osobenno naglyadno v rabotakh vydayushchikhsya nemetskikh filosof I.Kanta, G.V.F.Gegelya.
Sersenov K.M. Issledovanie problemy gosudarstvennogo prinuzhdeniya v rossiyskoy yuridicheskoy nauke // Istoriya gosudarstva i prava. 1999. № 1-2. S.24-32.
Marchenko M.N. Ponyatie sravnitel nogo prava // Vestnik Mosk. un-ta. Seriya 11. Pravo. 1999. № 1. S. 44-53;
Marchenko M.N. Ob ekt i predmet sravnitel nogo prava // Tam zhe. № 2. S.43-54;
Timirov YU.A. Problemy sravnitel nogo zakonovedeniya // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1993. № 8. S.43-51
Turovskiy R.T. Sravnitel nyy analiz tendentsiy regional nogo razvitiya Rossii i Ukrainy // Polis. 1999. № 6. S. 49-61;
Peregudov S.P. Grazhdanskoe obshchestvo v politicheskom izmerenii // Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 1995. № 12. S.74-85
Mamitova N.V. Teoriya rossiyskogo konstitutsionalizma: istoriya i sovremennost . M.: Izd-vo RGTEU, 2005. i dr.
Kovachev D.A. O kriteriyakh otsenki rezul tatov sravneniya v oblasti gosudarstvennogo prava // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1992. № 10. S.123-127.
Gaykov V.T., CHernov R.I. Lyudologicheskiy metod issledovaniya primenitel no k yurisprudentsii // Izvestiya vuzov. Sev.-Kavkaz. region. Obshchestvennye nauki. 2000. № 1. S.66-74;
Prokof ev G.S. Analiz yuridicheskogo teksta: nekotorye voprosy teorii // Vestnik Mosk. un-ta. Ser. 11. Pravo. 1995. № 2. S.80-85 i dr.
Isakov Pravovye akty: obshcheteoreticheskie aspekty issledovaniya//Pravovedenie. 2002. № 3.S.16-28.
Temnov E.I. O deideologizatsii metodologicheskikh podkhodov v istoriko-politicheskikh i konstitutsionno-pravovykh issledovaniyakh // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1992. №3. S.73-79.
SHaykenov N.A. Pravovoe obespechenie interesov lichnosti. S.51 52.
Matuzov N.I. Vozmozhnost i deystvitel nost v pravovoy sfere // Pravovedenie. 2000. № 3. S.16 30.
Lysukho S.V. Evolyutsiya issledovaniya kategorii zakonnye interesy v yurisprudentsii. // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2013. №1. S. 35.

A legitimate interest, methodology, the rule of law, the norm of morality, legislation, the branch of law, right, the law, power, the state.