CONTENTS OF PROOF, CARRIED OUT DURING OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
( Pp. 120-122)
More about authors
Mashovets Asiya Okeanovna
kand. yurid. nauk, docent. Dolzhnost: docent kafedry. Mesto raboty: Uralskiy gosudarstvennyy yuridicheskiy universitet. Podrazdelenie: kafedra ugolovnogo processa.
The Ural State University of Law
The Ural State University of Law
Abstract:
The article investigates issues relating to criminal procedure proof during the trial. The author analyzes the different points of view scientists protsessualistov on the content of proof. Identifies the differences and similarities that exist between legal evidence and trial. Particular attention is paid to the definition of the subject and scope of judicial proof
How to Cite:
Mashovets A.O., (2015), CONTENTS OF PROOF, CARRIED OUT DURING OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS. Business in Law, 3 => 120-122.
Reference list:
Aleksandrov A.S. Vvedenie v sudebnuyu lingvistiku. N. Novgorod: Nizhegorodskaya pravovaya akademiya, 2003.
Aleksandrov A.S., Grishin S.P. Perekrestnyy dopros v sude (ob yasnenie ego sushchnosti i poryadka provedeniya, a takzhe prakticheskoe nastavlenie k upotrebleniyu). M.: Izd-vo YUrlitinform , 2007.
Aleksandrov A.S., Kucheruk D.S. Rezul taty ORM - baza prigovora Stat ya 2. Rossiyskie reglamenty ustareli //Rossiyskiy sledovatel . 2012. № 6. S. 35-39.
Vladimirov L.E. Uchenie ob ugolovnykh dokazatel stvakh. CHasti: Obshchaya i Osobennaya. 3-e izd., izm. i zakonch. S.-Pb.: Kn. mag. Zakonovedenie , 1910. S. 123-124.
Grishin S.P. Sudebnoe sledstvie v smeshannom ugolovnom protsesse (gnoseologicheskiy, protsessual nyy i taktiko-kriminalisticheskiy aspekty). M.: Izd-vo YUrlitinform , 2008.
Kukhta A.A. Dokazyvanie istiny v ugolovnom protsesse //Dis d-ra yurid. nauk. N. Novgorod, 2010. S. 474.
Popov V.F. Sudebnoe sledstvie: problemy optimizatsii: Monografiya. N. Novgorod, 2000.
Ustav ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. Sistematizirovannyy kommentariy (st. 595-764). / Pod red. prof. M.N. Gerneta. Vypusk 4. M., 1916.
Aleksandrov A.S., Grishin S.P. Perekrestnyy dopros v sude (ob yasnenie ego sushchnosti i poryadka provedeniya, a takzhe prakticheskoe nastavlenie k upotrebleniyu). M.: Izd-vo YUrlitinform , 2007.
Aleksandrov A.S., Kucheruk D.S. Rezul taty ORM - baza prigovora Stat ya 2. Rossiyskie reglamenty ustareli //Rossiyskiy sledovatel . 2012. № 6. S. 35-39.
Vladimirov L.E. Uchenie ob ugolovnykh dokazatel stvakh. CHasti: Obshchaya i Osobennaya. 3-e izd., izm. i zakonch. S.-Pb.: Kn. mag. Zakonovedenie , 1910. S. 123-124.
Grishin S.P. Sudebnoe sledstvie v smeshannom ugolovnom protsesse (gnoseologicheskiy, protsessual nyy i taktiko-kriminalisticheskiy aspekty). M.: Izd-vo YUrlitinform , 2008.
Kukhta A.A. Dokazyvanie istiny v ugolovnom protsesse //Dis d-ra yurid. nauk. N. Novgorod, 2010. S. 474.
Popov V.F. Sudebnoe sledstvie: problemy optimizatsii: Monografiya. N. Novgorod, 2000.
Ustav ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. Sistematizirovannyy kommentariy (st. 595-764). / Pod red. prof. M.N. Gerneta. Vypusk 4. M., 1916.
Keywords:
the judicial investigation, criminal procedure proving, criminal case.
