FORGERY OR DESTRUCTION OF THE VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: PREVENTIVE POTENTIAL AS THE BASIS OF CRIMINALIZATION?
( Pp. 96-99)

More about authors
Chuklina Elena Y. aspirant
the Southern federal university
Abstract:
Background. The article is devoted to study of the social conditionality of the introduction of criminal law ban on forgery or destruction of the vehicle identification number. Methods. The study is based on the analytical potential of the classical Soviet theory of criminalization. For the purposes of the study carried out an analysis of the judicial practice of the norm expressed art. 326 of the Criminal Code. Conclusions. The study demonstrated that during the introduction of criminal liability for forgery or destruction of the vehicle identification number instead the base of criminalization «the occasion of criminalization» was applied. Recently, this approach is widely used in the legislative process during the introduction of new offences. The trend of the use of preventive potential criminal prohibitions leads to unreasonable expansion of criminal law. Originality/ value. The article is based on the author’s original concept that combines the criminal law doctrine of double prevention norms and criminological strategy of situational crime prevention. The article contains important criticisms regarding the use of preventive potential to substantiate criminal prohibitions and is intended primarily for the legislator
How to Cite:
Chuklina E.Y., (2015), FORGERY OR DESTRUCTION OF THE VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: PREVENTIVE POTENTIAL AS THE BASIS OF CRIMINALIZATION?. Business in Law, 3 => 96-99.
Reference list:
Agaev G.A., Abbasov F.N. Prestupleniya protiv poryadka upravleniya: Voprosy teorii i praktiki: monografiya. SPb., 2005.
Arkhipov A.A., SHarapov R.D. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost za prestupleniya, svyazannye s fal sifikatsiey nomernykh registratsionno-uchetnykh parametrov transportnykh sredstv: monografiya. M.: YUrlitinform, 2012.
Bakharev A.V. Kriminologicheskaya kharakteristika i preduprezhdenie krazh i ugonov avtotransportnykh sredstv organami vnutrennikh del: dis. kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.08. Moskva. 2008.
Gilinskiy YA.I. Kriminologiya. Kurs lektsiy. SPb.: Piter, 2002.
Egiazaryan N.A. Prestupleniya protiv poryadka upravleniya v ugolovnom prave Armenii i Rossii (sravnitel no-pravovoe issledovanie): monografiya (otv. red. CHuchaev A.I.). M.: Kontrakt. 2013.
Inshakov S.M. Zarubezhnaya kriminologiya. M.: Norma, Infra-M, 1997.
Kudryavtsev V.N., YAkovlev A.M. Osnovaniya ugolovno-pravovogo zapreta: kriminalizatsiya i dekriminalizatsiya. Akademiya Nauk SSSR. Institut gosudarstva i prava. M.: Nauka, 1982.
Kudryashov A.V. KHishcheniya avtotransporta: voprosy kvalifikatsii, ugolovno-pravovye i kriminologicheskie mery protivodeystviya: dis. kand. yurid. nauk. 12.00.08. CHelyabinsk. 2005.
Lebedev A.S. Sotsial naya obuslovlennost kriminalizatsii poddelki ili unichtozheniya identifikatsionnogo nomera transportnogo sredstva // Kriminologicheskiy zhurnal OGUEP. 3(17) 2011.
Lopashenko N.A. Osnovy ugolovno-pravovogo vozdeystviya: ugolovno pravo, ugolovnyy zakon, ugolovno-pravovaya politika. SPb.: YUridicheskiy TSentr Press, 2004.
Luneev V.V. Kurs mirovoy i rossiyskoy kriminologii: uchebnik. V 2 t. T I. Obshchaya chast . M.: Izdatel stvo YUrayt, 2011.
Sarukhanyan A.R. Prestupleniya protiv poryadka upravleniya: obshchaya kharakteristika, voprosy kvalifikatsii: dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Stavropol , 2002.
SHestakov D.A. Kriminologiya: Novye podkhody k prestupleniyu i prestupnosti. Kriminogennye zakony i kriminologicheskoe zakonodatel stvo. Protivodeystvie prestupnosti v izmenyayushchemsya mire: Uchebnik. SPb.: YUridicheskiy TSentr Press, 2006.
Bekkaria CH. O prestupleniyakh i nakazaniyakh / sost. i predisl. V.S. Ovchinskogo. M.: INFRA-M. 2001. VI.
Clarke R. Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies. New York. 1997
Keywords:
rules of double prevention, article 326 of the criminal code, marking, identification, criminalization.