About differentiation of extremist and terrorist offenses on Criminal Law of the Russian Federation
( Pp. 52-55)

More about authors
Mozhegova Anastasiya Anatolievna aspirantka kafedry Ugolovnogo prava i kriminologii
Lomonosov Moscow State University
For read the full article, please, register or log in
Abstract:
The problem. The problem of this article is establishment of extremist and terrorist’s correlation, an emphasizing of specific characteristics each of these facts, which are criterions for offenses’ differentiation. The form. This work made by means of analysis of legal and regulatory framework devoted to extremism and terrorism’s opposition, also by means of study the materials of jurisprudence. The conclusion. Terrorism and extremism are different asocial phenomenons thereby the definition of terrorist organization in federal law «About action against terrorism» requires an elaboration. The definition of extremist action given in federal law «About action against extremist action» requires a modification too. It is necessary to exclude special position from this definition. According it a public justification of terrorism and another different terrorist actions refers to extremist action. The practical value. The practical value of this article consists in the possibility of using its recommendations by law enforcement officers who realize acts against extremists and terrorist offences. The singularity. This article has new theoretical positions and made by the author scientific advices on improving standards of Criminal Law of the Russian Federation. The complex comparison of extremist and terrorist offences was made and the recommendations for their delimitation were given. Suggestions for changes in criminal laws can be taken into account to the preparation for relevant bills, Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, can be used in next research on dissertation’s issues.
How to Cite:
Mozhegova A.A., (2014), ABOUT DIFFERENTIATION OF EXTREMIST AND TERRORIST OFFENSES ON CRIMINAL LAW OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. Business in Law, 3: 52-55.
Reference list:
Agapov P.V., Mikhaylov K.V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost za sodeystvie terroristicheskoy deyatel nosti: tendentsii sovremennoy ugolovnoy politiki // SPS Konsul tantPlyus .
Antonyan YU.M. Terrorizm. Kriminologicheskoe i ugolovno-pravovoe issledovanie. M., 2001. S. 345.
Gilinskiy YA.I. Sovremennyy terrorizm: kto vinovat i chto delat // Filosofskie nauki, 2005. № 9. S. 17.
Pavlinov A.V. Antigosudarstvennyy ekstremizm: ugolovno-pravovye i kriminologicheskie aspekty. M., 2008. S. 408.
Rossiyskaya gazeta Elektronnyy resurs / Rezhim dostupa: http://www.rg.ru/2011/07/04/vs-dok.html svobodnyy.
Rossiyskaya gazeta Elektronnyy resurs / Rezhim dostupa: http://www.rg.ru/2006/04/28/terrorist-anons.html svobodnyy.
Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF, 2002. № 30. St. 3031.
Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF, 2006. № 11. St. 1146.
Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF, 2014. № 19. St. 2335.
Terrorizm v sovremennoy Rossii: sostoyanie i tendentsii ( kruglyy stol ) // SPS Konsul tant Plyus .
Keywords:
extremism, terrorism, crimes of an extremist orientation, terrorist crimes.