On the issue of legislative regulation and practice of application of preventive measures, elected by a court decision in the criminal process of Russia
( Pp. 198-202)

More about authors
Novikova Ekaterina Anatolyevna
Belgorod law Institute of MIA Russia named after I.D.Putilin Eduard A. Vinokurov
I.D. Putilin Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Belgorod, Russian Federation Belgorod State National Research University, Belgorod, Russian Federation Lukyanchikova Viktoriya Viktorovna
Putilin Belgorod Law Institute of Ministry of the Interior of Russia
Belgorod, Russia Arkhiptsev Ivan N. kand. yurid. nauk, docent kafedry ugolovno-pravovyh disciplin
the Belgorod Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia named after I.D. Putilin
Belgorod, Russian Federation
Abstract:
The article analyzes the normative regulation of the application of preventive measures elected by a court decision. The authors conduct a comprehensive analysis of the use of such preventive measures as bail, house arrest, prohibition of certain actions from the standpoint of their application as alternative measures of detention. Thus, the analysis of the specified measures of restraint is carried out taking into account law enforcement practice which specifies that at the choice of a measure of restraint the law enforcement officer not always proceed from the principles of proportionality and objective need for the solution of tasks of criminal proceedings. This circumstance entails a more frequent use of preventive measures elected by the court in relation to more lenient preventive measures such as: not to leave, supervision of a minor suspect or accused, personal guarantee, supervision of the command of the military unit.
How to Cite:
Novikova E.A., Eduard A.V., Lukyanchikova V.V., Arkhiptsev I.N., (2015), ON THE ISSUE OF LEGISLATIVE REGULATION AND PRACTICE OF APPLICATION OF PREVENTIVE MEASURES, ELECTED BY A COURT DECISION IN THE CRIMINAL PROCESS OF RUSSIA. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 6 => 198-202.
Reference list:
Kvyk A.V. K voprosu o nesovershenstve sisteme sredstv kontrolya za nakhozhdeniem podozrevaemogo (obvinyaemogo) pod domashnim arestom // Rossiyskiy sledovatel . 2017 № 4. S. 24-26.
Klimov V.V. Problemy zakonnosti i obosnovannosti primeneniya domashnego aresta v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossii Elektronnyy resurs . Rezhim dostupa: https://cyberleninka.ru(Data obrashcheniya 11.06.2019).
Mery preventivnogo (predupreditel nogo) kharaktera Elektronnyy resurs . Rezhim dostupa http://www.texts.news (Data obrashcheniya 16.07.2019).
Otchet o rabote sudov obshchey yurisdiktsii po rassmotreniyu ugolovnykh del po pervoy instantsii za 12 mesyatsev 2018 goda. Ofitsial nyy sayt Sudebnogo departamenta pri Verkhovnom sude Rossiyskoy Federatsii Elektronnyy resurs . Rezhim dostupahttp://www.cdep.ru (Data obrashcheniya 11.06.2019).
Postanovlenie plenuma Verkhovnogo suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 19.12.2013 № 41 O praktike primeneniya sudami zakonodatel stva o merakh presecheniya v vide zaklyucheniya pod strazhu, domashnego aresta i zaloga // Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF. № 2. Fevral . 2014.
Prikaz Minyusta Rossii/MVD Rossii/SK Rossii/FSB Rossii/FSKN Rossii № 26/67/13/105/56 ot 11.02.2016 Ob utverzhdenii poryadka osushchestvleniya kontrolya za nakhozhdeniem podozrevaemykh ili obvinyaemykh v meste ispolneniya mery presecheniya v vide domashnego aresta i za soblyudeniem imi nalozhennykh sudom zapretov i (ili) ogranicheniy // Ofitsial nyy internet-portal pravovoy informatsii http://www.pravo.gov.ru. 25.03.2016.
Selyanin M.A. Prichiny neeffektivnosti ispolneniya mery presecheniya v vide domashnego aresta i metody ikh ustraneniya Elektronnyy resurs . Rezhim dostupa: https://studref.com (Data obrashcheniya 11.06.2019).
Sm.: Zakhartsev S.I. Ogranicheniya i zaprety nalagaemye na obvinyaemogo (podozrevaemogo) pri izbranii domashnego aresta v kachestve mery presecheniya // Obshchestvo i pravo. 2018. № 1 (63) S. 63.
Sm.: Klassifikatsiya mer presecheniya Elektronnyy resurs . Rezhim dostupa: https://helpiks.org (Data obrashcheniya 11.06.2019).
Sm.: Kopylova O.P. Mery prinuzhdeniya v ugolovnom protsesse: uchebnoe posobie / O.P. Kopylova. - Tambov : Izd-vo GOU VPO TGU, 2011. S. 7-8.
Federal nyy zakon ot 18.04.2018 № 72-FZ O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovno-protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii v chasti izbraniya i primeneniya mer presecheniya v vide zapreta opredelennykh deystviy, zaloga i domashnego aresta // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 2018. № 17. St. 2421.