On the relationship of entrepreneurial relations and propertyrelations to the object of criminal legal protectionof business activities
( Pp. 131-134)

The article deals with the problem of determining the direct object for crimes in the sphere of economic activity that encroach on entrepreneurial relations. The nature of the crimes and the sphere of entrepreneurial activity, in which they manifest themselves, are expressed in the presence of a variety of additional direct objects in the composition of norms that provide for liability for encroachments on entrepreneurial relations. Among all the collections of crimes that further encroach on property, the author identifies a group of acts in which property suffers facultatively in connection with the commission of theft. After analyzing the forensic investigation, the author comes to the conclusion that there are problematic issues concerning the appropriateness of the criminalization of Art. 172.2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and Art. 200.3 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.

Kharkov A.V., (2017), ON THE RELATIONSHIP OF ENTREPRENEURIAL RELATIONS AND PROPERTYRELATIONS TO THE OBJECT OF CRIMINAL LEGAL PROTECTIONOF BUSINESS ACTIVITIES. Sociopolitical Sciences, 4 => 131-134.

Berdinskikh S. V. Problemy kvalifikatsii Kriminal nykh bankrotstv (st. 195-197 UK RF) i otgranichenie ikh ot smezhnykh sostavov prestupleniy // Biznes v zakone. Ekonomiko-yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2011. № 2. S. 138 140.
Verbitskaya N. A. Ob ekt zloupotrebleniy pri emissii tsennykh bumag // 2006 / Vestnik Krasnoyarskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2006. № 11. S. 444 449.
Garmash A. M. Prestupnost v predprinimatel skoy deyatel nosti v korporativnaya prestupnost kak sostavlyayushchie ekonomicheskoy prestupnosti // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2012. № 4. S. 173 176;
Gladkikh V. I. Osobennosti kvalifikatsii fiktivnogo bankrotstva // Vestnik universiteta. 2013. № 8. S. 127 131.
Gladkikh V. I. Nekotorye voprosy kvalifikatsii i primeneniya normy ob otvetstvennosti za nezakonnoe poluchenie kredita // Rossiyskiy sledovatel . 2015. № 3. S. 26 32.
Delo № 1-20/2014 (1-233/2013): Arkhiv Ipatovskogo rayonnogo suda Stavropol skogo kraya.
Delo 1-196/2011: Arkhiv sovetskogo rayonnogo suda g. Samary.
Kozlovskiy P. V. Osobennosti vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela o fal sifikatsii finansovykh dokumentov finansovoy organizatsii // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2015. № 3. S. 101 105.
Kostyuk M. F., Selyamin A. A. Ugolovno-pravovoy analiz i osobennosti kvalifikatsii nezakonnogo polucheniya kredita (ch. 1 st. 176 UK RF) // Rossiyskiy sledovatel . 2016. № 16. S. 23 26.
Kubantsev S. P. Ugolovno-pravovaya kharakteristika ob ekta prestupleniy v sfere bankrotstva // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2015. № 7. S. 83 96.
Lopashenko N. A. Posyagatel stva na sobstvennost : monografiya. M.: Norma, Infra-M, 2012. 528 s.
Lyaskalo A. K voprosu o sub ektivnykh priznakakh kriminal nykh bankrotstv (st. st. 195 - 197 UK RF) // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2012. № 6. S. 35 40.
Lyaskalo A. N. Razgranichenie nezakonnogo polucheniya kredita i inykh sostavov prestupleniy // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2014. № 11. S. 58 63.
Rastoropov S. V., Zvonov A. V. Kara ugolovnogo nakazaniya v vide shtrafa: kratkiy analiz soderzhatel noy storony // Bezopasnost biznesa. 2016. № 5. S. 55 58.
Tatsiy V. YA. Ob ekt i predmet prestupleniya v sovetskom ugolovnom prave. KHar kov, 1988. - 198 s.
Ulez ko S. I. Klassifikatsiya ob ektov prestupleniya // Obshchestvo i Pravo. 2013. № 4. S. 69 73.
CHirkin K. V. Moshennichestvo v sfere kreditovaniya i kreditnyy obman // Zakonnost . 2016. № 12. S. 46 48.
YAshchenko A. S. Prednamerennoe bankrotstvo: problemy kvalifikatsii i razgranicheniya smezhnykh sostavov prestupleniy. // Vestnik Branskogo universiteta. 2015. № 3. S. 178 180.

illegal business activities, attacks on legitimate business activities, direct object, ownership relations.