DIFFICULTIES IN REALIZING THE RIGHT OF CITIZENS TO THE NECESSARY DEFENSE
( Pp. 151-154)
More about authors
Seregina Elena Vladimirovna
Cand.Sci.(Law), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Criminal Law, T
Russian State University of Justice, Rostov branch
Rostov-on-Don, Russia
Russian State University of Justice, Rostov branch
Rostov-on-Don, Russia
Abstract:
In the article the analysis of development of scientific representations about the basis of occurrence of the right to necessary defense is spent, the problems arising in judicial practice at application of norms about necessary defense are considered. The approaches to the improvement of the legislative regulation of the necessary defense. Recommendations are formulated to facilitate a proper assessment of the conditions for the legality of the necessary defense that can be used in the process of law enforcement activities.
How to Cite:
Seregina E.V., (2018), DIFFICULTIES IN REALIZING THE RIGHT OF CITIZENS TO THE NECESSARY DEFENSE. Sociopolitical Sciences, 4 => 151-154.
Reference list:
Aliev T.T. Neobkhodimaya oborona: problemy kvalifikatsii //Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2016. № 2. S. 5 - 8.
Bakhteeva E.I. Prevyshenie predelov neobkhodimoy oborony: Problemy kvalifikatsii: Dissertatsiya k.yu.n. Ekaterinburg, 1997. 155s.
Glavnoe organizatsionno-analiticheskoe upravlenie pravovoy statistiki General noy prokuratury rossiyskoy Federatsii. Sostoyanie prestupnosti v Rossii za yanvar - dekabr 2016 (elektronnyy resurs): // https://xn--b1aew.xn-- p1ai/folder/ (data obrashcheniya: 12.03.2018).
Devyatko A.YU. Ispolnenie prikaza ili rasporyazheniya i neobkhodimaya oborona kak obstoyatel stva, isklyuchayushchie prestupnost deyaniya // Voenno-yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2010. № 9. S. 21 - 25.
Zarya A.V. Usloviya i predely pravomernosti neobkhodimoy oborony po ugolovnomu pravu Rossii: Dissertatsiya k.yu.n. M., 2009. 173s.
Zvecharovskiy I. Komu neobkhodima neobkhodimaya oborona // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2013. № 1. S. 28 - 30.
Popov K.I. Neobkhodimaya oborona: tolkovanie Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii //Rossiyskiy sledovatel . 2013. № 19. S. 36 - 38.
SHelkovnikova E.D. Neobkhodimaya oborona: togda i teper //Kalashnikov. Oruzhie, boepripasy, snaryazhenie. 2007. № 3. S. 24 - 27.
Bakhteeva E.I. Prevyshenie predelov neobkhodimoy oborony: Problemy kvalifikatsii: Dissertatsiya k.yu.n. Ekaterinburg, 1997. 155s.
Glavnoe organizatsionno-analiticheskoe upravlenie pravovoy statistiki General noy prokuratury rossiyskoy Federatsii. Sostoyanie prestupnosti v Rossii za yanvar - dekabr 2016 (elektronnyy resurs): // https://xn--b1aew.xn-- p1ai/folder/ (data obrashcheniya: 12.03.2018).
Devyatko A.YU. Ispolnenie prikaza ili rasporyazheniya i neobkhodimaya oborona kak obstoyatel stva, isklyuchayushchie prestupnost deyaniya // Voenno-yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2010. № 9. S. 21 - 25.
Zarya A.V. Usloviya i predely pravomernosti neobkhodimoy oborony po ugolovnomu pravu Rossii: Dissertatsiya k.yu.n. M., 2009. 173s.
Zvecharovskiy I. Komu neobkhodima neobkhodimaya oborona // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2013. № 1. S. 28 - 30.
Popov K.I. Neobkhodimaya oborona: tolkovanie Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii //Rossiyskiy sledovatel . 2013. № 19. S. 36 - 38.
SHelkovnikova E.D. Neobkhodimaya oborona: togda i teper //Kalashnikov. Oruzhie, boepripasy, snaryazhenie. 2007. № 3. S. 24 - 27.
