PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN VIOLATION OF CONDITIONS AN OPEN LICENSE
( Pp. 107-116)

Background: The work is aimed at differentiating intellectual property protection measures that could be effectively used by the rightholder in digital environment. Open license (Russian analogue of a free license) was introduced into the Civil Code of the Russian Federation in 2014, however, neither in judicial practice nor in doctrine have been defined actual instruments of intellectual property rights protection in violation of the conditions of such license. Methods: The author used general scientific methods, including abstraction, generalization, analysis, synthesis, as well as special methods of cognition, including formal-legal, comparative-legal and other methods. The field of research is related to the law of intellectual property. Results: The application of intellectual property protection measures in case of violation of the conditions of an open license has a mixed restorative-preventive character with a predominant restorative element and is intended to ensure the further distribution and prevention of illegal using the intellectual property object. In the article is noted the important role of such measure of protection as publication of a court decision on an admitted violation with indication of the actual rightholder. The scope of the study: In this paper is substantiated that a number of civil-law protection measures are not effective in violation of the exclusive right of the rightholder. For example, recovery of damages is extremely difficult. It is stated that protection of rightholder rights is also possible (but it is unlikely to be really applicable) within administrative and criminal legislation. Practical importance: In spite of the fact that the open license is distributed within the limits provided by the legal owner, it has the right to establish technical means that may be limited by the possibility of using objects depending on the licenses granted. The author of the work underlines the limitations of norms in force in this area and suggests a mechanism for removing technical protection means, if they can be used in accordance with the conditions of open licenses. Social consequences: The implementation of conclusions that made in the work will allow using open license more freely, eliminating rightholders fears who consider that existing measures of intellectual property protection are ineffective if terms of such license are violated. Originality/Value: The mechanisms for protecting intellectual property rights in case of violation of the conditions of an open license are defined in this paper, as also the available (albeit extremely few) Russian judicial practice on this issue is analyzed. The study is intended for legislators, judges, practicing lawyers, researchers and anyone who is interested in the topic of intellectual property law.

Nagrodskaya V.B., (2017), PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN VIOLATION OF CONDITIONS AN OPEN LICENSE. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 5 => 107-116.

YAtsenko T.S. Grazhdansko-pravovaya okhrana publichnykh interesov: dis..dokt. yurid. nauk: 12.00.03 / YAtsenko Tat yana Sergeevna. - M., 2016.
Jaeger T. GPL Enforcement and License Compliance in Europe. Open Compliance Summit, Yokohama, December 13th, 2013. Elektronnyy resurs // URL: http://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files /OCS2013 TillJaeger.pdf (data poslednego obrashcheniya 02.10.2017 god).
Cosovanu C. Free Open Source Software Litigation Elektronnyy resurs // URL:https://www.eiseverywhere.com/file uploads/ 7cbc009243b665726d8182c5418a482d Cosovanu-NEW2.pdf (data poslednego obrashcheniya 02.10.2017 god).
Marple J.D. What You Should Know About Open Source Software Elektronnyy resurs // URL: https://www.lw.com/upload/pubContent / pdf/pub1062 1.pdf (data poslednego obrashcheniya 02.10.2017 god).
Novoselova L.A. O nekotorykh voprosakh otvetstvennosti za narushenie isklyuchitel nykh prav / L.A.Novoselova // Pravovaya zashchita intellektual noy sobstvennosti: problemy teorii i praktiki. Sbornik materialov III Mezhdunarodnogo IP Foruma. - M.: RG-Press, 2015. 392 s.
Luk yanchikova E. Mery zashchity i mery otvetstvennosti, primenyaemye pri narushenii intellektual nykh prav / E. Luk yanchikova // Intellektual naya sobstvennost . Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye prava. 2011. № 5.
Grazhdanskoe pravo. Uchebnik. CHast I. Pod red. A.P. Sergeeva, YU.K.Tolstogo. -M.: Prospekt, 1998. 632 s.
Sud po intellektual nym pravam. Istoriya sozdaniya i perspektivy razvitiya / O.V.Dobrynin i dr. . - M.: INITS PATENT , 2013. 183 s.
Gribanov V.P. Predely osushchestvleniya i zashchity grazhdanskikh prav. - M. : Statut, 2001. 411 s.
Basin YU.G. Osnovy grazhdanskogo zakonodatel stva o zashchite sub ektivnykh grazhdanskikh prav. Problemy primeneniya osnov grazhdanskogo zakonodatel stva i osnov grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva Soyuza SSR i soyuznykh respublik / YU.G. Basin // Sbornik materialov. - Saratov: Izdatel stvo Saratovskogo yuridicheskogo instituta, 1971.
ZHarova A.K. Pravovaya zashchita intellektual noy sobstvennosti: ucheb. posobie dlya magistrov / A.K.ZHarova; pod obshch. red. S.V.Mal tsevoy. - M. : Izdatel stvo YUrayt, 2012. 373 c.
Zaychenko N., Seliverstova V. Kak bez narusheniy ispol zovat otkrytyy soft / N. Zaychenko, V. Seliverstova // Korporativnyy yurist.2014. № 8.

open license, the digital environment, protection of intellectual property rights, DRM, Creative Commons, GPL.