EVIDENTIARY ACTIVITIES FEATURES BY INQUIRY PRODUCTION IN THE REDUCED FORM
( Pp. 143-146)

More about authors
Skripchenkova Oksana Valerievna soiskatel
Academy of the Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation
Abstract:
The article deals with the features of the evidence-based activity in the production of an inquiry in a shortened form. The author is justified that the right of the inquirer, when carrying out an inquiry in abbreviated form, does not verify evidence provokes a violation of the principle of presumption of innocence by this provision. It was concluded that it is necessary to verify the evidence and the right of the investigator to not support the information collected by the results of other investigative actions, including the verification character. It is proposed to exclude clause 4 of part 3 of Article 226.5 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation.
How to Cite:
Skripchenkova O.V., (2017), EVIDENTIARY ACTIVITIES FEATURES BY INQUIRY PRODUCTION IN THE REDUCED FORM. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 4 => 143-146.
Reference list:
Ugolovnyy protsess Rossii. Problemnye lektsii: uchebnoe posobie (dlyastudentov vysshikh yuridicheskikh uchebnykh zavedeniy) / nauch. red. V.T. Tomin,A.P. Popov, I.A. Zinchenko. Pyatigorsk: Izd.: RIA-KMV, 2014. S. 224.
Vasil ev O.L. Novyy etap reformy dosudebnykh stadiy ugolovnogo protsessa. Kriticheskiy analiz novell 2013 g. // Zakon. 2013. № 8. S. 105.
Sumin A. A. Sokrashchennoe doznanie: mertvorozhdennoe ditya reformatorov ugolovnogo protsessa // Advokat. 2013. № 10. S. 8.
Andreeva O.I. Problemy proizvodstva doznaniya v sokrashchennoy forme // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo. 2014.№4 (14). S. 11.
Derishev YU.V. Ugolovnoe dosudebnoe proizvodstvo: kontseptsiya protsessual nogo i funktsional no-pravovogo postroeniya: Dis.. d-ra yurid. nauk. Omsk, 2005. S. 258.
Koryakin V.A. Imitatsiya deystviya prezumptsii nevinovnosti pri proizvodstve doznaniya v sokrashchennoy forme // Rossiyskiy sledovatel . 2015. № 9. S. 36-39.
Androsenko N.V. Priznanie litsom svoey viny v sovershenii prestupleniya i ego pravovye posledstviya: Dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2008. S. 10.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 29 noyabrya 2016 g. № 55 O sudebnom prigovore // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2016. № 277.
Kal nitskiy V., Murav ev K., Voronov D. Kontseptsiya doznaniya v sokrashchennoy forme: dostizheniya i voprosy sovershenstvovaniya // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2013. № 3. S. 84.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 21 dekabrya 2010 g. № 28 O sudebnoy ekspertize po ugolovnym delam // Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2011. № 2.
Zaytseva E.A. Plenum Verkhovnogo Suda RF: sudebnaya ekspertiza po ugolovnym delam // Zakonnost . 2011. № 3. S. 13.
Prikaz MVD RF ot 11 yanvarya 2009 g. № 7 Ob utverzhdenii Nastavleniya po organizatsii ekspertno-kriminalisticheskoy deyatel nosti v sisteme MVD Rossii // SPS Konsul tantPlyus .
CHadnova I.V. Osobennosti predvaritel nogo rassledovaniya v forme sokrashchennogo doznaniya // Pravovye problemy ukrepleniya rossiyskoy gosudarstvennosti. CHast 59. Tomsk: Izdatel stvo Tomskogo universiteta, 2013. S. 230.
Keywords:
proof, urgent investigative actions, verification of evidence, the principle of the presumption of innocence in pre-trial proceedings, forensic examination, expert opinion.


Related Articles

Criminal Law Pages: 29-36 DOI: 10.33693/2782-7372-2023-2-1-29-36 Issue №22977
Probable Conclusion of an Expert in a Criminal Case: Evaluation and Use by the Prosecutor in Court (Debatable Issues)
criminal proceedings evidence evaluation of evidence expert opinion probable expert opinion
Show more
10. Financial law; Tax law; Budgetary law; Administrative law; Administrative process Pages: 192-194 Issue №5975
TO THE QUESTION ABOUT THE ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUE PRECLUSION
prejudice the administrative process proof
Show more
15. Criminal procedure Pages: 239-246 Issue №12273
THE RIGHT OF THE ADVOCATE-DEFENDER TO RECEPTION OPINION OF A SPECIALIST AND ITS PRESENTATION TO SUBJOIN TO THE MATERIALS OF THE CRIMINAL CASE: GUARANTEE AND PROBLEMS OF IMPLEMENTATION
criminal proceedings defense attorney specialist expert opinion expert
Show more
14. FORENSICS; FORENSIC EXPERTISE; OPERATIONAL AND SEARCH ACTIVITIES 12.00.12 Pages: 318-321 Issue №17564
Subject, objects and tasks of forensic examination of intellectual property objects
forensic science forensic examination special knowledge patents trademarks
Show more
13. FORENSICS; FORENSIC EXPERTISE; OPERATIONAL AND SEARCH ACTIVITIES (12.00.12) Pages: 270-276 DOI: 10.33693/2072-3164-2021-14-3-270-276 Issue №18933
Conceptual Foundations of the Private Theory of Forensic Economic Expertise
specialist participation specialized knowledge forensic activity preliminary research specialist consultation
Show more
14. FORENSICS; FORENSIC EXPERTISE; OPERATIONAL AND SEARCH ACTIVITIES 12.00.12 Pages: 314-317 Issue №17564
Detection, recording and preservation of important forensic information when examining damaged documents
forensic examination document examination of documents legal proceedings
Show more
7. Criminal procedure Pages: 209-213 Issue №4982
SUBSTANTIATION AS A TYPE OF COGNITION AND ITS THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL MEANING
the criminal process proof proof knowledge research evidence
Show more
5. PUBLIC LAW (STATE LAW) (5.1.2.) Pages: 260-266 Issue №21729
Expertise as a Form of Evidence in the Tax Process
expertise evidence tax process means of proof decision
Show more
7. Criminal procedure Pages: 178-183 Issue №2615
Scientific and technological progress and the problems of improving criminal procedural legislation
criminal procedure law proof source of evidence documents annexes to the protocols of investigative actions
Show more
8. Criminal procedure Pages: 202-206 Issue №6840
TRADITIONAL AND NEW APPROACHES TO THE LEGALLY DEFINITIONS OF "EVIDENCE" IN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
the criminal process the comparativism law of evidence proof sources of evidence
Show more