THE RIGHT OF THE ADVOCATE-DEFENDER TO RECEPTION OPINION OF A SPECIALIST AND ITS PRESENTATION TO SUBJOIN TO THE MATERIALS OF THE CRIMINAL CASE: GUARANTEE AND PROBLEMS OF IMPLEMENTATION
( Pp. 239-246)

The purpose of this article is the author's desire, on the one hand, to draw attention to the fact that the right of the advocate-defender to obtain the opinion of a specialist on issues related to legal assistance, and his involvement in the materials of the criminal case is an important means of ensuring the legitimate interests of the principal, equalizing the ability of the parties to collect evidence in the adversarial criminal proceedings, and on the other hand - to reveal the problems of realization of this right due to its insufficient legislative regulation and lack of necessary procedural guarantees. Area of study/methodology: The article analyzes the norms of the current criminal procedure legislation of the Russian Federation, regulating the right of a advocate-defender to attract a specialist in order to obtain his written opinion and attach it to the materials of the criminal case, as well as the practice of implementing these rules. The article provides examples from the author's own advocate practice. When writing the article used the dialectical, logical, systematic, formal-legal methods. Conclusions: The author comes to the conclusion that in practice, due to the opinion of a specialist presented by the advocate-defender, the shortcomings of the existing expert opinion can be found, and the defense side has the opportunity to get answers to its questions and use the information received from the specialist in the process of proof to justify its own position in the case. The article draws attention to the fact that, unlike an expert, a specialist in the preparation of his / her written opinion on the basis of the materials submitted to him / her by the defense party, as a rule, has and operates already identified (open) information and is not entitled to receive new information experimentally. The author of the article proposes to strengthen the guarantees of the right of a lawyer-defender to attract a specialist in order to obtain his written opinion, which will finally destroy the stereotypical approach to the unequal evaluation of the opinion of a specialist in practice compared to the expert's opinion and other sources of evidence. Novelty/originality/value: The article has a certain scientific value and practical significance, as it contains conclusions and proposals that can be useful in reforming the current criminal procedure legislation of the Russian Federation and its application in relation to the right of a advocate-defender to obtain and attach to the materials of the criminal case the opinion of a specialist.

Sukhova O.A., (2018), THE RIGHT OF THE ADVOCATE-DEFENDER TO RECEPTION OPINION OF A SPECIALIST AND ITS PRESENTATION TO SUBJOIN TO THE MATERIALS OF THE CRIMINAL CASE: GUARANTEE AND PROBLEMS OF IMPLEMENTATION. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 3 => 239-246.

Ugolovno-protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 18 dekabrya 2001 g. № 174-FZ Elektronnyy resurs : (s izm. i dop., v red. ot 23 apr. 2018 g.). Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovno-protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii Elektronnyy resurs : Feder. zakon ot 17 apr. 2017 g. № 73-FZ. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13 iyunya 1996 g. № 63-FZ Elektronnyy resurs : (s izm. i dop., v red. ot 23 apr. 2018 g.). Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
Ob advokatskoy deyatel nosti i advokature Elektronnyy resurs : Feder. zakon ot 31 maya 2002 g. № 63-FZ (v red. ot 29.07.2017 g.) Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
Ob otkaze v prinyatii k rassmotreniyu zhaloby grazhdanina Bugorskogo V.YU. na narushenie ego konstitutsionnykh prav polozheniyami statey 58, 80 i 168 Ugolovno-protsessual nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii Elektronnyy resurs : Opredelenie Konstituts. Suda RF ot 21 okt. 2008 g. № 514-O-O Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
O sudebnoy ekspertize po ugolovnym delam Elektronnyy resurs : Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhov. Suda RF ot 21 dek. 2010 g. № 28. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
O praktike primeneniya zakonodatel stva pri rassmotrenii ugolovnykh del v sude pervoy instantsii (obshchiy poryadok sudoproizvodstva) : Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhov. Suda RF ot 19 dek. 2017 g. № 51. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
Arabuli D. T. Teoreticheskie osnovy prava zashchitnika privlekat spetsialista // Uchenye zapiski: sb. nauch. tr. yuridicheskogo fakul teta Orenburgskogo gos. un-ta. Orenburg, 2007. Vyp. 5. - S. 103-117.
Markova T.YU. Zaklyuchenie spetsialista - dokazatel stvo v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. - M.: YUrist, 2010, № 2. - S. 13-16.
Ragulin A.V. Pravo advokata-zashchitnika na privlechenie spetsialista: problemy realizatsii i puti ikh resheniya// Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta im. V.N. Tatishcheva. 2012. - № 2 76 . - S. 57-66.
SHeyfer S. A. Kuda dvizhetsya rossiyskoe sudoproizvodstvo (Razmyshleniya po povodu vektorov razvitiya ugolovno - protsessual nogo zakonodatel stva) // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2007. №1. - S. S. 28-37.
Ugolovnoe delo № 1-15 / 2004 // Arkhiv Leninskogo rayonnogo suda g. Saranska Respubliki Mordoviya. 2004 god.
Ugolovnoe delo № 1-5/2015 // Arkhiv Kovylkinskogo rayonnogo suda Respubliki Mordoviya. 2015 god.
Ugolovnoe delo №1-17/2015 // Arkhiv Leninskogo rayonnogo suda g. Saranska Respubliki Mordoviya. 2015 god.
Ugolovnoe delo № 1-55/2016// Arkhiv Ruzaevkogo rayonnogo suda Respubliki Mordoviya. 2016 god.
Ugolovnoe delo № 1-51/2017// Arkhiv Ruzaevkogo rayonnogo suda Respubliki Mordoviya. 2017 god.
Ugolovnoe delo № 1-10/2017 // Arkhiv Melekesskogo rayonnogo suda Ul yanovskoy oblasti. 2017 god.
Ugolovnoe delo № 1-88/2018 // Arkhiv Zavodskogo rayonnogo suda g. Saratova. 2018 god.
Ugolovnoe delo № 30093 // Materialy proizvodstva doznaniya UFSSP Rossii po Respublike Mordoviya. 2015 god.

criminal proceedings, defense attorney, specialist, expert opinion, expert, source of evidence.