THE NATIONAL IDEA IN THE FIELD OF PRIVATE LAW IN RUSSIA
( Pp. 75-78)

Task. The question of the national idea in the field of private law in Russia is unexplored domestic legal doctrine for a number of reasons. First, there is no national idea of Russia as a whole, which does not allow to form the idea of private law for the realities of the Russian legal space. Secondly, the right and its division into private and publicly for the Russian legal reality and science is a developing, not fully formed institution. The aim of the work is to study the issue of national ideas in the field of private law in Russia. To achieve this goal, it is necessary to solve the following tasks: - research of scientific literature of domestic and foreign authors on the national idea in the field of private law; - study of legal regulation in the field of national ideas in the field of private law; - the study of the position of statesmen of modern Russia on the formation of a national idea in the field of private law. The issue of the national idea in the field of private law has not been touched upon either by domestic legal science or foreign legal doctrine. Nevertheless, the study of the problems of the national idea in General, including in the legal context in Russia was engaged in Berdyaev N. A. Vorob'ev K. A., Parshikov A. N., Ioffe O. S., Smolin, M. B., Sulakshin S. S., Telemtayev M., And Troitsky, E. S. Model. The methodological basis of the research is represented by such methods as philosophical method - method of dialectics; General scientific - historical method; General logical methods - analysis, synthesis, deduction, induction; special legal-formal - legal method, comparative legal method, method of state-legal regulation. Summary. In the post-Soviet period of formation of private law in Russia it is necessary to identify the basic necessary conditions for the formation of a national idea in the field of private law. These, in our opinion, include: - legal accessibility of private law regulation; - development of civil society institutions through private law regulation; - satisfaction of human interests through private law regulation, to improve and simplify life; - building the independence of the legal system of private law disputes; - development of legal literacy in the sphere of private law relations. Research framework/the possibility of subsequent use of the results of scientific work This scientific article is a study in the framework of the national legal doctrine by analyzing the works of scientists in the field of private law, as well as the study of legislation in the field of private law, formed at the moment. The results of this research will enrich the knowledge in the field of private law and will be useful for use in subsequent studies of private law relations. Practical importance. The practical significance of the results of this scientific article lies in the fact that the conclusions made in this study can be applied in law-making activities, thereby filling the existing gaps, which in the future will have a positive impact on public life. Social consequence. This scientific work will give a new impetus to the development of private law in the Russian Federation, as a necessary condition for improving legal accessibility, civil society institutions, the independence of the judicial system, maintaining the interests of man and citizen, the development of legal literacy. The national idea in the field of private law is not formed material in the Russian legal field, which is why this article is aimed at laying the foundations of the Russian national idea in the field of private law. This work is valuable both for private law in General and for certain aspects of life in the spheres of public life, justice and the economy. In addition, this article is a presentation of the author's approach to the formation of a national idea in the field of private law in Russia.

Okriashvili T.G., (2018), THE NATIONAL IDEA IN THE FIELD OF PRIVATE LAW IN RUSSIA. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 2 => 75-78.

Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast pervaya) ot 30.11.1994 № 51-FZ (red. ot 29.12.2017) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF , 05.12.1994, № 32, st. 3301.
Grazhdanskiy kodeks RSFSR (utv. VS RSFSR 11.06.1964) (red. ot 26.11.2001) // Vedomosti VS RSFSR , 1964, № 24, st. 407. (utratil silu).
Zakon RF ot 07.02.1992 № 2300-1 (red. ot 01.05.2017) O zashchite prav potrebiteley // Vedomosti SND i VS RF , 09.04.1992, № 15, st. 766.
Zakon SSSR ot 22.05.1991 № 2184-1 O zashchite prav potrebiteley // Vedomosti SND SSSR i VS SSSR , 1991, № 24, st. 689. (utratil silu).
Nalogovyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast vtoraya) ot 05.08.2000 № 117-FZ (red. ot 07.03.2018) (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 01.04.2018) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF , 07.08.2000, № 32, st. 3340.
Alieskerov M.A. Sostyazatel nyy grazhdanskiy protsess v pravovom sotsial nom gosudarstve // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2017. N 11. S. 5 - 8.
David R., ZHoffre-Spinozi K. Osnovnye pravovye sistemy sovremennosti: Per. s fr. V.A. Tumanova. - M.: Mezhdunar. otnosheniya, 1999. - 400 s.
Ozhegov, S.I. Tolkovyy slovar russkogo yazyka: Okolo 100 000 slov, terminov i frazeologicheskikh vyrazheniy / S.I. Ozhegov; Pod red. L.I. Skvortsov. - M.: ONIKS-LIT, Mir i Obrazovanie, 2012. - 1376 c.
Okriashvili T.G. Zarozhdenie i razvitie vozzreniy predstaviteley russkogo liberalizma XIX v. na chastnopravovye otnosheniya // Agrarnoe i zemel noe pravo. 2012. № 12 (96). S. 67-78
Okriashvili T.G. Sushchnost prava v chastnopravovom regulirovanii // Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika. 2013. № 1 (97). S. 19-23.
Okriashvili T.G., YAkupov A.G. Znachimost dobrovol noy realizatsii chastnopravovoy otvetstvennosti //Sovremennye dostizheniya i razrabotki v oblasti yurisprudentsii Sbornik nauchnykh trudov po itogam mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. 2016. S. 5-7.
YAkupov A.G., Isaev E.E. O problemakh nezavisimykh antikorruptsionnykh ekspertiz // Nauka, obrazovanie, obshchestvo: tendentsii i perspektivy razvitiya Sbornik materialov IV Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii: v 2 tomakh. 2017. S. 237-238.

right, private law, private-law relations, the national idea, the law, society.