PROCEDURAL JUDGMENTS MADE BY THE PROSECUTOR AT THE STAGE OF INSTITUTION OF A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING AND THEIR LEGAL EFFECTS
( Pp. 183-190)

More about authors
Sindeev Andrey Yu. soiskatel uchenoy stepeni kandidata yuridicheskih nauk; pervyy zamestitel Basmannogo mezhrayonnogo prokurora g. Moskvy
Prosecutor’s Office of Moscow; Moscow Academy of the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation
Abstract:
This article describes the legal effects of the procedural judgments by the prosecutor at the stage of initiation of a criminal case in the Russian Federation made in performing his/her professional duties. Task and purpose. The main tasks and purposes pursued by the author when writing this article were as follows: - to study the legal nature of the stage of initiation of a criminal case; - to examine legal effects following procedural judgments by the prosecutor at the stage of initiation of a criminal case; - to study every procedural judgment in all the details; - to view the prosecutor’s resolution on the submission of case files to consider the issue of criminal prosecution as a reason for the initiation of a criminal case; - to research into the legal consequences of adoption of decisions on the criminal procedure relationship as well as their influence on the purpose of criminal justice process. Methodological basis is composed of general scientific and specific methods, such as: comparative legal and systemic-structured. Conclusions. A research was made into the contents of legal effects of procedural judgments by the prosecutor at the stage of initiation of a criminal case, procedural judgments by the prosecutor at this stage were considered in detail. In view of the above, the author came to the conclusion to maintain the refusal to initiate criminal proceedings in the domestic criminal law. Besides, it was suggested that one should enshrine in law a 5 day term for submission of crime message verification files to the prosecutor with the decision to refuse initiation of a criminal case and establishment of the obligation for preliminary investigation bodies to initiate the criminal proceedings at receipt of prosecutor's investigation files together with the resolution of the prosecutor according to cl. 2, part 2, Art. 37 of the Russian Federation Code of Criminal Procedure. The prosecutor’s power to withdraw examination and criminal case files from one preliminary investigation authority and submission to another and influence of this decision on legal relationship in the form of their termination and emergence between new participants has been investigated as well. Possible subsequent use of deliverables. The research into the contents of legal effects of procedural judgments by the prosecutor at the stage of initiation of a criminal case enables to examine the specified procedural judgments made by the prosecutor in terms of their contents and value in the criminal proceedings and their influence on achievement of purpose of criminal proceedings. Conclusions drawn and suggestions received may be used to modify the criminal procedural legislation and organizational and administrative documents of the Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation and other departments. Practical value. Interrogating officers, investigators, prosecutors, judges will be able to use deliverables in their current activities while adopting procedural judgments at the stage of initiation of criminal proceedings in order to enhance their quality. Students of higher education institutions may study the specified procedural judgments considering conclusions of this article to understand their legal essence. Value. Approbation of deliverables, conducted research in practice has been subordinated to achievement of the criminal trial’s purpose.
How to Cite:
Sindeev A.Y., (2018), PROCEDURAL JUDGMENTS MADE BY THE PROSECUTOR AT THE STAGE OF INSTITUTION OF A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING AND THEIR LEGAL EFFECTS. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 4 => 183-190.
Reference list:
Abdul-Kadyrov SH.M. Osushchestvlenie prokurorom ugolovnogo presledovaniya i nadzora za ispolneniem zakonov v dosudebnom proizvodstve. M., YUrlitinform, 2016.
Ageev A.N.Organizatsiya prokurorskogo nadzora v stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela: dis. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2009.
Bazhanov S. Opravdana li tak nazyvaemaya dosledstvennaya proverka //Zakonnost , 1995.
Bozh ev V. P. Sushchnost izmeneniy ot 2 dekabrya 2008 g. // Zakonnost . 2009. № 5.
Vandyshev V.V. Ugolovnyy protsess: obshchaya i osobennaya chast . Uchebnik dlya VUZov i yuridicheskikh fakul tetov. M.: 2010.
Veretennikov N.V. Obespechenie prokurorom zakonnosti v stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela: avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Rostov n/D, 2009.
Vlasov V.I., Goncharov N.F. Istoriya rozysknogo protsessa v Rossii: zakonodatel stvo i praktika. Domodedovo, 1997. № 1.
Voskobitova L. A. Obvinenie ili obvinitel nyy uklon //Aktual nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2014. № 3.
Gavrilov B.YA. 150 let Ustavu ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva i sovremennaya ugolovno-protsessual naya deyatel nost : dokl. na mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt.konf. M., Akad. upravleniya MVD Rossii, 2014.
Gushchev V.E., Aleksandrov A.S. Narodnoe obvinenie v ugolovnom sude. N. Novgorod, 1998.
Kapinus O. S. K voprosu o protsessual nom polozhenii prokurora v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Prokuror. 2013. № 2.
Kapranov A.V. Optimizatsiya stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela: avtoref. dis kand. yurid. nauk. Rostov n/D, 2005.
Kovaleva M.G. Vozbuzhdenie ugolovnogo dela i obespechenie ego zakonnosti i obosnovannosti: dis. kand. yurid. nauk. SPB, 2005.
Kozilov E.N. Povody k vozbuzhdeniyu ugolovnogo dela: yuridicheskaya priroda, sistema. Puti sovershenstvovaniya // Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. 2007. N 2
Kolokolov N. A. Velikoe protivostoyanie: sledovatel vs. prokuror // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2014. № 10.
Kuz menko E.L. Sistema povodov k vozbuzhdeniyu ugolovnogo dela: teoreticheskiy i prikladnoy aspekty: avtoref. diss.. kand. yurid. nauk. Nizhniy Novgorod, 2007.
Kuz minA.S., MukhtasipovaT.N. Vidy povodov dlya vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela//ZHurnal Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta, 2014.
Litvinenko K.L.Obespechenie prava grazhdan na dostup k pravosudiyu v stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela: dis. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2012.
Ogorodov A.N. Protsessual naya samostoyatel nost sledovatelya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: diss. kand. yurid. nauk. M. 2017.
Petrov A. Znachenie i neobkhodimost stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela// Zakonnost , 2014. № 5.
Serebrova S.P. Problemy ratsionalizatsii dosudebnogo proizvodstva: dis. kand. yurid. nauk. N. Novgorod, 1995.
Solov ev A. B. Problema obespecheniya zakonnosti pri proizvodstve predvaritel nogo sledstviya v svyazi s izmeneniem protsessual nogo statusa prokurora // Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. 2007. № 3.
KHaliulin A. G. Polnomochiya prokurora po nadzoru za protsessual noy deyatel nost yu organov predvaritel nogo sledstviya // Zakonnost . 2007. № 9.
Material proverki soobshcheniya o prestuplenii № 201/11 ot 28.07.2011 // Arkhiv Sledstvennogo upravleniya Sledstvennogo komiteta Rossiyskoy Federatsii po Irkutskoy oblasti.
O roli prokuratury v sisteme ugolovnogo pravosudiya: Rekomendatsiya Komiteta ministrov Soveta Evropy 19 gosudarstvam-chlenam ot 6 oktyabrya 2000 g. № R (2000), prinyata Komitetom ministrov Soveta Evropy na 724-m zasedanii predstaviteley Ministrov // ZHurn. ros.prava. 2001. № 8.
Pravovoe regulirovanie dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnym delam nuzhdaetsya v ispravlenii sistemnykh oshibok // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2008. № 11.