THE PROCEDURE FOR PREPARATION JUDICIAL SESSION ON CONSIDERATION OF THE PETITION OF THE INVESTIGATOR INVESTIGATIVE ACTIONS
( Pp. 191-195)

More about authors
Kripinevich Svetlana S. zam. zaveduyuschego kafedroy ugolovno-processualnogo prava
Russian state University of justice
Abstract:
The goal: Preparation for court hearing in the criminal su-doprovodu regarded only as the first trial of STA-Diya. The vast majority of studies of Russian and foreign scientists are devoted to its problems. However, in modern conditions, more and more important (legal and social) is the preparatory activity at the stage before the trial in the pre-trial stages of criminal proceedings. The main problem associated with this activity is the absence of a legally defined procedural form for the Commission of procedural actions and the application of procedural decisions, including in cases of appeal of the investigator (investigator) to the court for permission to conduct investigative actions. Thus, the main purpose of this study is to determine the basic data for the creation of a procedural form of preparatory activities before the court session to review and resolve applications for investigative actions. The tasks that were set by the author, it is, first of all, the theoretical justification of the thesis about the need for the process-SUAL form for the implementation of preparatory activities, and thus-the formation of author's proposals on its basic rules. Methodology: In the course of the study various General and private scientific research methods were used: induction, deduction, generalization, abstraction, forecasting, modeling, functional-structural analysis, systematic, logical, comparison, formalization, etc. Conclusions: As a result of the study the following conclusions are formulated. 1. In the pre-trial stages of criminal proceedings, the procedural form of the preparatory activity of the judge has developed a factual one, but it does not stand out and is not separated into a separate criminal procedural institution, which to a certain extent has a negative impact on the investigative and judicial practice, depriving it of predictability and certainty. 2. Taking into account that the thorough preparation of the court session provides for the legal, reasonable and motivated decision on the merits of the claimed request of the investigator on the production of the investigative action, it is proposed to improve the form of this preparation by the relevant additions to article 165 of the code of criminal procedure, in particular, to: - part 1 of art. 165 of the code of criminal procedure after the words «what is the decision» with the words «corresponding to the requirements established by article 7 of this Code»; - article 165 of the criminal procedure code of the Russian Federation the new part 3, deleting the previous edition of part 3. The possibility of subsequent use: The results obtained can be used to improve the criminal procedure legislation of the Russian Federation, to continue research in the field of optimization of procedural full-time judges, investigators, other participants in the preparatory activities, to improve judicial and investigative practice, as well as during the educational process in the preparation of students in the direction of «Law-dention» (bachelor's, master's, postgraduate). The practical significance of the results is expressed in the possibility of their use in legislative, investigative and judicial activities. Social significance of the obtained results revealed indirectly, through the optimization of legislative regulation of criminal procedure relations and increasing the level of protection of citizens ' constitutional rights in preparation for the court session on consideration of requests for investigative actions in douleb-tion stages of criminal proceedings. The value of the results obtained is due to the presence in it of the formation of the problem, which is essential for the perfection of criminal proceedings in General (achieving their appointment in full), as well as in a certain part-to improve the efficiency of the procedural activities of the court, the investigator, the investigator, as well as ensuring the rights and freedoms, the legitimate interests of the participants. On the basis of the conducted research, new knowledge about the procedural form in General, as well as the form of the court, investigator, inquiry at the stage preceding the beginning of the court session on the consideration of applications for investigative actions. The work is intended for researchers and practitioners, students of law schools.
How to Cite:
Kripinevich S.S., (2018), THE PROCEDURE FOR PREPARATION JUDICIAL SESSION ON CONSIDERATION OF THE PETITION OF THE INVESTIGATOR INVESTIGATIVE ACTIONS. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 4 => 191-195.
Reference list:
Bekov YA.KH. Podgotovka dela k sudebnomu razbiratel stvu v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve: dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2009. 30 s.
Bibilo V.N. Etapy razvitiya pravovogo regulirovaniya stadii naznacheniya i podgotovki sudebnogo razbiratel stva v ugolovnom protsesse // Pravo i demokratiya: cb. nauch. tr. Vyp. 22 / red. kol.: V. N. Bibilo (gl. red.) i dr. . Minsk: BGU, 2011. 311 s.
Voronin S.E. Dialogi ob ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossii: monografiya. KHabarovsk: Izd-vo Dal nevost. yurid. in-ta MVD Rossii, 2007. 176 s.
Govorun D.N. Deystvie printsipa publichnosti v podgotovitel nom proizvodstve v sude pervoy instantsii po UPK Ukrainy 2012 goda // ZHurnal nauchnykh publikatsiy aspirantov i doktorantov. 2013. №10. S. 122-127.
Kovtun N.N. Sudebnyy kontrol v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossii. N. Novgorod: Nizhegorodskaya pravovaya akademiya, 2002. 332 s.
Kurs ugolovnogo protsessa / pod red. d.yu.n., prof. L.V. Golovko. 2-e izd., ispr. M.: Statut, 2017. 1280 s.
Mishchenko E.V. Problemy unifikatsii norm protsessual noy formy v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Vestnik Volzhskogo un-ta im. V.N. Tatishcheva. 2014. № 1 (80). S. 76-81.
Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 8 aprelya 2004 g. № 132-O Po zhalobe grazhdanina Gorskogo Anatoliya Vadimovicha na narushenie ego konstitutsionnykh prav punktom 6 chasti vtoroy stat i 231 Ugolovno-protsessual nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2004. 9 iyunya.
Saratova N.N., Teyvan-Treynovskiy YA.S. Problemy obespecheniya pravosudiya na stadii sudebnogo razbiratel stva v ugolovnom protsesse Latvii: sb st. po materialam ezhegodnoy Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. Problemy pravovogo obespecheniya bezopasnosti lichnosti, obshchestva i gosudarstva . V 3 t. Novosibirsk, 2016. T. 3. S. 131-137.
Spravka Rostovskogo oblastnogo suda o rezul tatakh provedennogo izucheniya i analiza sudebnoy praktiki polucheniya razresheniya na proizvodstvo sledstvennykh deystviy (stat ya 165 UPK RF) v 2015 godu // http://oblsud.ros.sudrf.ru.
Strogovich M.S. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa. V 2-kh t. M.: YUrid. lit., 1970. T. 2. 516 s.
SHaukharov K.A. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie voprosy naznacheniya glavnogo sudebnogo razbiratel stva po UPK RK: avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Astana, 2009. 28 s.
YUnusov A.A. Voprosy podgotovki dela k sudebnomu razbiratel stvu v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse // Aktual nye problemy ekonomiki i prava. 2007. № 2. S. 166-178.
YUrkevich N.A. Osobennosti sudebno-revizionnoy formy predaniya obvinyaemogo sudu // Vestnik Kemerovskogo gos. un-ta. 2015. № 2 (62). T. 2. S. 237-240.