Problems of legal regulation of the legal status considered in criminal proceedings
( Pp. 238-241)
More about authors
Krysin Victor A.
starshiy prepodavatel kafedry ugolovno-processualnogo prava i kriminalistiki yuridicheskogo fakulteta
All-Russian State University of Justice, Sredne-Volzhsky Institute (branch)
Saransk, Russian Federation Smolin Andrei G. kandidat yuridicheskih nauk; docent kafedry ugolovno-processualnogo prava i kriminalistiki yuridicheskogo fakulteta
All-Russian State University of Justice, Sredne-Volzhsky Institute (branch)
Saransk, Russian Federation Sushkova Yuliya N.
Ogarev Mordovian State University
Saransk, Russian Federation Shigurov Alexander V. Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Criminal Procedure Law and criminalistics of the Faculty of Law
Middle-Volga Institute (branch) of the All-Russian State University of Justice (RPA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia)
Saransk, Russian Federation
All-Russian State University of Justice, Sredne-Volzhsky Institute (branch)
Saransk, Russian Federation Smolin Andrei G. kandidat yuridicheskih nauk; docent kafedry ugolovno-processualnogo prava i kriminalistiki yuridicheskogo fakulteta
All-Russian State University of Justice, Sredne-Volzhsky Institute (branch)
Saransk, Russian Federation Sushkova Yuliya N.
Ogarev Mordovian State University
Saransk, Russian Federation Shigurov Alexander V. Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Criminal Procedure Law and criminalistics of the Faculty of Law
Middle-Volga Institute (branch) of the All-Russian State University of Justice (RPA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia)
Saransk, Russian Federation
Abstract:
The authors consider a number of urgent problems of legal regulation of the status of witnesses in criminal proceedings. The article proposes to include additional prohibitions (incapacity, limited legal capacity, the presence of physical and mental disabilities that impede the identification of the progress and results of an investigative action, the state of intoxication) and requirements (Russian citizenship, knowledge of the language of the court) to persons involved as witnesses. The authors note that the prevailing practice, which admits accepting the involvement of relatives as witnesses (husband-wife, father-son, brothers, etc.), is contrary to the current law. However, since the legal restrictions on the participation of witnesses-relatives in the case are excessive, the article substantiates the proposal to exclude these prohibitions from the current criminal procedure law.
How to Cite:
Krysin V.A., Smolin A.G., Sushkova Y.N., Shigurov A.V., (2020), PROBLEMS OF LEGAL REGULATION OF THE LEGAL STATUS CONSIDERED IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 3 => 238-241.
Reference list:
Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Amurskogo oblastnogo suda ot 11.07.2013 po delu № 22-1151/13. Dostup iz spravochnoy pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 03.11.2015 po delu № 48-APU15-37. Dostup iz spravochnoy pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Moskovskogo gorodskogo suda ot 05.11.2013 po delu № 10-10766. Dostup iz spravochnoy pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda Respubliki Mordoviya ot 27.06.2016 po delu № 22-1195/2016. URL: https://bsr.sudrf.ru/bigs/showDocument.html id 3 482dbaf96353b1dd06b05a886e6fadce shard Vse dela (novoe)
Grigor ev V. N., Pobedkin A. V., YAshin V. N. Ugolovnyy protsess: uchebnik. M.: Izd-vo Eksmo, 2015. S. 141.
ZHeltobryukhov S. P. O neobkhodimosti uprazdneniya instituta ponyatykh // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2018. № 2. S. 51-54
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Kaliningradskogo oblastnogo suda ot 26.12.2011 po delu № 22-2862 2011. URL: https://oblsudkln.sudrf.ru/modules.php name sud delo srv num 1 name op doc number 4095692 delo id 4 new 0 text number 1 case id 33520.
Kommentariy k Ugolovno-protsessual nomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Postateynyy / pod red. N. A. Petukhova, G. I. Zagorskogo. M.: IKF EKMOS , 2012. S. 437.
Kommentariy k Ugolovno-protsessual nomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii / otv. red. V. I. Radchenko; nauch. red. V. T. Tomin, M. P. Polyakov. M.: YUrayt-Izdat, 2014. S. 276.
Mikhaylov A. Institut ponyatykh - arkhaizm rossiyskogo ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Zakonnost . 2003. № 4. S. 24.
Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Orenburgskogo oblastnogo suda ot 24.04.2017 po delu № 44u-42/2017. Dostup iz spravochnoy pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
Prigovor Kovylkinskogo rayonnogo suda Respubliki Mordoviya po ugolovnomu delu № 1-55/2018 ot 31.07.2018 // Arkhiv Kovylkinskogo rayonnogo suda Respubliki Mordoviya. 2019.
Prigovor mirovogo sud i sudebnogo uchastka № 1 Krasnotur inskogo sudebnogo rayona Sverdlovskoy oblasti ot 24.03.2014 po ugolovnomu delu № 1-12/2014. URL: http://1kar.svd.msudrf.ru/modules.php name sud delo op sd number 110434609 case number 85654816 delo id 1540006.
Protokol osmotra mesta proisshestviya ot 18.09.2018 po ugolovnomu delu № 1-2-1/2019 // Arkhiv CHamzinskogo rayonnogo suda Respubliki Mordoviya. 2019 g.
Smolin A. G., Sushkova YU. N., SHigurov A. V. Evolyutsiya i napravleniya sovershenstvovaniya pravovykh garantiy vypolneniya ponyatymi svoikh obyazannostey // Sotsial no-politicheskie nauki. 2019. T. 9. № 2. S. 67-70.
Ugolovnye dela № 1-18/2016, 1-91/2012, 1-166/2013 // Arkhiv Proletarskogo rayonnogo suda g. Saranska Respubliki Mordoviya. 2019 g.
CHepunov O. I., Minaev A. V. Pravovoe razvitie instituta ponyatykh v sovremennykh usloviyakh // Rossiyskiy sud ya. 2015. № 8. S. 20-23.
Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 03.11.2015 po delu № 48-APU15-37. Dostup iz spravochnoy pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Moskovskogo gorodskogo suda ot 05.11.2013 po delu № 10-10766. Dostup iz spravochnoy pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda Respubliki Mordoviya ot 27.06.2016 po delu № 22-1195/2016. URL: https://bsr.sudrf.ru/bigs/showDocument.html id 3 482dbaf96353b1dd06b05a886e6fadce shard Vse dela (novoe)
Grigor ev V. N., Pobedkin A. V., YAshin V. N. Ugolovnyy protsess: uchebnik. M.: Izd-vo Eksmo, 2015. S. 141.
ZHeltobryukhov S. P. O neobkhodimosti uprazdneniya instituta ponyatykh // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2018. № 2. S. 51-54
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Kaliningradskogo oblastnogo suda ot 26.12.2011 po delu № 22-2862 2011. URL: https://oblsudkln.sudrf.ru/modules.php name sud delo srv num 1 name op doc number 4095692 delo id 4 new 0 text number 1 case id 33520.
Kommentariy k Ugolovno-protsessual nomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Postateynyy / pod red. N. A. Petukhova, G. I. Zagorskogo. M.: IKF EKMOS , 2012. S. 437.
Kommentariy k Ugolovno-protsessual nomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii / otv. red. V. I. Radchenko; nauch. red. V. T. Tomin, M. P. Polyakov. M.: YUrayt-Izdat, 2014. S. 276.
Mikhaylov A. Institut ponyatykh - arkhaizm rossiyskogo ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Zakonnost . 2003. № 4. S. 24.
Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Orenburgskogo oblastnogo suda ot 24.04.2017 po delu № 44u-42/2017. Dostup iz spravochnoy pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
Prigovor Kovylkinskogo rayonnogo suda Respubliki Mordoviya po ugolovnomu delu № 1-55/2018 ot 31.07.2018 // Arkhiv Kovylkinskogo rayonnogo suda Respubliki Mordoviya. 2019.
Prigovor mirovogo sud i sudebnogo uchastka № 1 Krasnotur inskogo sudebnogo rayona Sverdlovskoy oblasti ot 24.03.2014 po ugolovnomu delu № 1-12/2014. URL: http://1kar.svd.msudrf.ru/modules.php name sud delo op sd number 110434609 case number 85654816 delo id 1540006.
Protokol osmotra mesta proisshestviya ot 18.09.2018 po ugolovnomu delu № 1-2-1/2019 // Arkhiv CHamzinskogo rayonnogo suda Respubliki Mordoviya. 2019 g.
Smolin A. G., Sushkova YU. N., SHigurov A. V. Evolyutsiya i napravleniya sovershenstvovaniya pravovykh garantiy vypolneniya ponyatymi svoikh obyazannostey // Sotsial no-politicheskie nauki. 2019. T. 9. № 2. S. 67-70.
Ugolovnye dela № 1-18/2016, 1-91/2012, 1-166/2013 // Arkhiv Proletarskogo rayonnogo suda g. Saranska Respubliki Mordoviya. 2019 g.
CHepunov O. I., Minaev A. V. Pravovoe razvitie instituta ponyatykh v sovremennykh usloviyakh // Rossiyskiy sud ya. 2015. № 8. S. 20-23.
Keywords:
criminal trial, witness, investigator, investigative action, guarantee, prohibition, restrictions.
Related Articles
CRIMINALISTIC, PROCEDURAL AND OPERATIVE-SEARCH MEASURES TO COUNTER CRIME IN THE GLOBALIZATION CONDITIONS Pages: 19-23 Issue №23752
On the Question of the Procedural Independence of the Investigator in the Criminal Process
procedural independence
preliminary investigation
investigator
powers
legal status.
Show more
11. Forensics; Forensic expertise; Operational and search activities Pages: 218-221 Issue №15895
ABOUT SOME MISTAKES MADE IN THE COURSE OF ESTABLISHING THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE UNKNOWN DISAPPEARANCE OF MINORS
missing person
minor
investigation
investigator
forensic investigator
Show more
7. Criminal procedure Pages: 165-168 Issue №16219
PROBLEM ASPECTS OF THEORY AND PRACTICE ARISING IN THE PRODUCTION OF presenting FOR THE IDENTIFICATION AND offers FOR MINIMIZING THEM
identification
evidence
presentation for identification
investigative action
Show more
8. Forensics; Forensic expertise; Operational and search activities Pages: 191-196 Issue №7594
Typical investigative situations at the initial stage of the preliminary investigation of the provocation of a bribe: theory and practice
provocation of a bribe
a preliminary investigation
the investigator
investigation situation
investigative action
Show more
10. Civil procedure arbitration procedure Pages: 159-162 Issue №5143
SOME PROBLEMS RELATED TO THE RIGHT NOT TO INCRIMINATE HIMSELF OR CLOSE RELATIVES
humanization of law
the criminal process
equality before the law
the right against self-incrimination
right not to testify against close relatives
Show more
10. FORENSICS; FORENSIC EXPERTISE; OPERATIONAL AND SEARCH ACTIVITIES (12.00.12) Pages: 230-234 Issue №18617
About some features of the search tactics
search
investigator
investigative action
tactics
criminalistics
Show more
11. YOUNG SCIENTISTS IN ACTUAL CRIMIAL LAW PROBLEMS SOLVING Pages: 230-233 Issue №17728
Procedure for implementation of prosecutor's supervision over the activities of bodies of inquiry at the stage of preliminary investigation
Investigator
Prosecutor
process
inquiry
supervision
Show more
10. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 12.00.09 Pages: 239-243 Issue №18348
Prosecutor in pre-trial proceedings on criminal cases (comparative legal analysis of the legislation of European States and the legislation of Russia)
Prosecutor
investigator
investigating judge
police
inquiry
Show more
6. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Pages: 225-229 Issue №16680
Evolution of urgent investigations: retrospective legislation prior to adoption article 157 of the code of Criminal procedure of the Russian Federation
Russian Empire
USSR
RSFSR
Russian Federation
Statute of Criminal Procedure 1864
Show more
4. CRIMINAL - LEGAL, CRIMINOLOGICAL, ADMINISTRATIVE AND OTHER MEASURES FOR COUNTERING CRIME IN CONTEMPORARY CONDITIONS Pages: 246-250 Issue №21338
The Ban on the Import and Export of Certain Types of Goods as a Measure of Influence (Counteraction) Used to Ensure the Security of the Russian Federation
sanctions
measures of influence
special economic measures
prohibition
hostile actions
Show more
