Bases of methods of the judicial economic examination performed by non-state experts in the field of the taxation in the procedural field
( Pp. 209-232)

Payment of legally established taxes represent the implementation of the constitutional obligation of economic actors enshrined in article 57 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. The basis of tax disputes between taxpayers and tax authorities in the majority of cases are based on various understanding of elements of the tax legislation, on various interpretation of provisions of the Tax code Russian Federation by a management of the economic actor and officials of the Federal Tax Service of the Russian Federation. In some cases in tax accounting and tax accounts of unfair taxpayers the deliberate distortion of accounting data with the purpose of understating of the tax which is subject of payment to the budget is observed. Many unsoluble contradictions between the taxpayer and the state and monitoring bodies which passed from tax process into other procedural field can be resolved by means of procedural tax examination. It is very difficult to estimate quality of the judicial expertizes which are carried out by non-state judicial experts statistically today, but a large number of repeated and additional examinations, confirm insufficient competence of non-state experts and small efficiency of their researches. Lack of state regulation of activities of non-state judicial experts, lack of the single code of ethics of the non-state judicial experts underlining the requirement of independence explaining line of conduct of the non-state judicial expert in various situations - all this in a complex doesn't promote increase in level of non-state judicial expert researches. The aforesaid emphasizes an urgent regulatory issue of non-state expert activities. Also allocates one of important tasks - creations of the special techniques intended for non-state court experts.

Knyazeva N.V., (2016), BASES OF METHODS OF THE JUDICIAL ECONOMIC EXAMINATION PERFORMED BY NON-STATE EXPERTS IN THE FIELD OF THE TAXATION IN THE PROCEDURAL FIELD. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 7 => 209-232.

Tamozhennyy kodeks Tamozhennogo soyuza;
Arbitrazhnyy protsessual nyy kodeks RF (APK RF);
Grazhdanskiy protsessual nyy kodeks RF (GPK RF);
Nalogovyy kodeks RF (NK RF);
Ugolovno-protsessual nyy kodeks RF (UPK RF);
Kodeks administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva RF;
Kodeks ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh;
Federal nyy zakon ot 31.05.2001 N 73-FZ quot;O gosudarstvennoy sudebno-ekspertnoy deyatel nosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii quot;;
Federal nyy zakon ot 30.12.2008 N 307-FZ quot;Ob auditorskoy deyatel nosti quot;;
Federal nyy zakon ot 6 dekabrya 2011 g. N 402-FZ quot;O bukhgalterskom uchete quot;;
Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 04.06.2007 N 320-O-P quot;Po zaprosu gruppy deputatov Gosudarstvennoy Dumy o proverke konstitutsionnosti abzatsev vtorogo i tret ego punkta 1 stat i 252 Nalogovogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii quot;;
Postanovlenie Plenuma VAS RF ot 12.10.2006 N 53 quot;Ob otsenke arbitrazhnymi sudami obosnovannosti polucheniya nalogoplatel shchikom nalogovoy vygody quot;;
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 21 dekabrya 2010 g. N 28 g. Moskva quot;O sudebnoy ekspertize po ugolovnym delam quot;;
Postanovlenie Plenuma VAS RF ot 04.04.2014 N 23 quot;O nekotorykh voprosakh praktiki primeneniya arbitrazhnymi sudami zakonodatel stva ob ekspertize quot;;
Informatsionnoe pis mo Prezidiuma VAS RF ot 17.11.2011 N 148 Obzor praktiki razresheniya arbitrazhnymi sudami del, svyazannykh s primeneniem otdel nykh polozheniy glavy 30 Nalogovogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ;
Prikaz FNS Rossii ot 30.05.2007 N MM-3-06/333 quot;Ob utverzhdenii Kontseptsii sistemy planirovaniya vyezdnykh nalogovykh proverok quot;, s uchetom Prilozheniya N 3 k dannomu prikazu Nalogovaya nagruzka po vidam ekonomicheskoy deyatel nosti, v protsentakh i Prilozhenie N 4 Rentabel nost prodannykh tovarov, produktsii, rabot, uslug i rentabel nost aktivov organizatsiy po vidam ekonomicheskoy deyatel nosti, v protsentakh ;
Prikaz MVD Rossii ot 29.06.2005 N 511 (red. ot 15.10.2012) quot;Voprosy organizatsii proizvodstva sudebnykh ekspertiz v ekspertno-kriminalisticheskikh podrazdeleniyakh organov vnutrennikh del Rossiyskoy Federatsii quot;;
Prikaz Minyusta RF ot 20.12.2002 N 346 quot;Ob utverzhdenii Metodicheskikh rekomendatsiy po proizvodstvu sudebnykh ekspertiz v gosudarstvennykh sudebno-ekspertnykh uchrezhdeniyakh sistemy Ministerstva yustitsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii;
Metodicheskie rekomendatsii Issledovanie avtomototransportnykh sredstv v tselyakh opredeleniya stoimosti vosstanovitel nogo remonta i otsenki. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii dlya sudebnykh ekspertov , (utv. Minyustom Rossii, 2013 v red. ot 22.01.2015);
Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po proverke naloga na pribyl i obyazatel stv pered byudzhetom pri provedenii audita i okazanii soputstvuyushchikh uslug. (utv. Minfinom RF 23.04.2004, odobreny Sovetom po auditorskoy deyatel nosti pri Minfine RF, protokol N 25 ot 22.04.2004);
Ofitsial nyy sayt Rossiyskogo federal nogo tsentra sudebnykh ekspertiz pri Minyuste Rossii (RFTSSE)po adresu: http://www.sudexpert.ru/;
Entsiklopediya sudebnoy ekspertizy. M., 1999. S. 224;
E.R. Rossinskaya, Sudebnaya ekspertiza v grazhdanskom, arbitrazhnom i ugolovnom protsesse. Izdanie 2e pererabotannoe i dopolnennoe. Moskva: Norma, 2008, 688 s.;
Osnovy formirovaniya zaklyucheniya eksperta / S. A. Smirnova, A. I. Usov, O. V. Miklyaeva; M-vo yustitsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii, Federal noe byudzhetnoe uchrezhdenie Rossiyskoy Federatsii TSentr sudebnoy ekspertizy pri M-ve yustitsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii. - Moskva : FBU RFTSSE pri Minyuste Rossii, 2015. - 234 s.;
Sudebnaya bukhgalteriya: Uchebnik / Pod red. d.yu.n. professora S.P. Golubyatnikova. - M.: YUrid. lit., 1998. - 368s. (str.325).;
Sudebnaya ekspertiza: tipichnye oshibki / E.I. Galyashina, V.V. Golikova, E.N. Dmitriev i dr.; pod red. E.R. Rossinskoy. M.: Prospekt, 2012. 544 s.;
Golikova V.V. Avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata yuridicheskikh nauk. Sudebnaya nalogovaya ekspertiza. Pravovye i metodologicheskie aspekty. Moskva - 2012. http://dislib.ru/yuridicheskie/6708-1-sudebnaya-nalogovaya-ekspertiza-pravovie-metodologicheskie-aspekti.php;
Zvyagin S.A. Razvitie metodologii i metodiki bukhgalterskoy ekspertizy. / Avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni doktora ekonomicheskikh nauk. FGU VPO Voronezhskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet. Voronezh. 2009. Arkhiv VAK Rossii. http://oldvak.ed.gov.ru/common/img/uploaded/files/vak/announcements/economich/2009/27-04/ZvyaginSA.pdf (Data obrashcheniya 01.06.2016 g.);
Borovkov A.V. Mesto i rol nalogovoy sudebnoy ekspertizy v protsesse rassledovaniya prestupleniy, predusmotrennykh stat ey 199 UK RF // Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. 5. YUrisprudentsiya. Problemy ugolovnogo zakonodatel stva. 2012. № 2 (17): 197-200;
Burvikov N.V. K voprosu o klassifikatsii zadach sudebnoy ekspertizy. // Izvestiya tul skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2013 № 4 (2): 151-157.
Vinogradova M.M., Nersesyan M.G. Ekonomicheskaya ekspertiza ee vidy i vozmozhnosti. // EZH-YUrist. 2005. N 46 http://www.zonazakona.ru/law/comments/59/ (data obrashcheniya 07.07.2016g.);
Golikova V.V. O nauchno metodicheskoy obosnovannosti pri proizvodstve sudebnoy nalogovoy ekspertizy. // Aktual nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. № 4. 2010: 217-225;
Kil deev P.A. Nalogovaya ekspertiza // Nalogovyy vestnik. Internet izdanie http://www.nalvest.ru/nv-articles/detail.php ID 28539 (data obrashcheniya 03.08.2016g.);
Knyazeva N.V. Metodika provedeniya ekonomicheskoy ekspertizy v nalogovom protsesse i sudebnom protsesse s uchastiem nalogovykh organov. // Moskva. Biznes v Zakone , 2016, №2:170-179;
Knyazeva N.V., (2015), Nalogovoe pravo. Poryadok sbora dokazatel stv v nalogovom protsesse. //. Biznes v zakone. Ekonomiko-yuridicheskiy zhurnal, 5: 77-96;
Knyazeva N.V. Metodika sostavleniya zaklyucheniya negosudarstvennym ekspertom po rezul tatam provedennoy ekonomicheskoy ekspertizy v protsessual nom pole. // Biznes v zakone. Ekonomiko-yuridicheskiy zhurnal, 2: 170-179;
Knyazeva N.V. Sovershenstvovanie metodiki provedeniya sudebnoy ekonomicheskoy ekspertizy opredeleniya chistykh aktivov organizatsii v protsessual nom pole. // Biznes v zakone. Ekonomiko-yuridicheskiy zhurnal, 3: 146-163;
Korzh V.P. Sovremennye problemy ispol zovaniya spetsial nykh znaniy pri rassledovanii ekonomicheskikh prestupleniy // Ekspert-kriminalist. 2013. N 4: 36 - 39.
Miklyaeva O.V. Dissertatsii po problemam sudebnoy ekspertizy. // Teoriya i praktika sudebnoy ekspertizy №1 (41) 2016: 160-165;
Nadein N.V. Knyazeva N.V. Professional nye uslugi ekspertov v protsessual nom, nalogovom i tamozhennom zakonodatel stve. // Moskva. R.I.S.K.: Resursy, informatsiya, snabzhenie, konkurentsiya , 2014, №2: 225-236;
Sakhnova T.V. Dokazatel stvennoe znachenie spetsial nykh poznaniy // EZH-YUrist. 27.05.2004. N 21;
SHarov V.I. Sistema metodov sudebnoy ekspertizy. // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo, 2014, № 3 (2): 269-272.

economic expertise, procedure, non-state forensic expert, methodology expertise, methods of examination, forensic economic expertise, tax due diligence, misrepresentation, due diligence, the reliability of the information, the accuracy of the information, law enforcement practice.