DIFFICULTIES OF SATISFACTORI LEGISLATIVE AUTHORIZATION PROBLEMS OF «CONSCIENTIOUSNESS» IN CIVIL LAW
( Pp. 64-67)

The situation in the scientific research area where the problem is still relevant: «wondering in what context it is necessary to interpret the concept of integrity» for the activities of the national legislator is not appropriate. It is unacceptably for a wide variation in opinions as to the conception of «conscientiousness», we believe, it prevents to the introduction of its complementary to working national legislation. However, join all the assurance to need the operational use of the concepts as «honesty», «reasonableness» and «justice» etc. in the national law was a consequence of the fact that the legislation of Kazakhstan and Russia has all these concepts. So, this difficulty was overcome by the factor «legal will». In particular, the situation is determined to such circumstances in the legislative sphere. The concepts as «honesty», «reasonableness» and «justice» and etc. are not fixed independently from each other in Civil Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan but their triad are present in the form of a stable population. It follows that in the civil law of Kazakhstan judgments and conclusions of any kinds are difficult to composite three-tier principle or three-level complex presumption. «Honesty» is set in the Civil Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the Russian Federation twice initially as a requirement for the participants of civil relations «to act in the exercise of their rights in good faith». However, once it was billed as the cancellation of the first to put forward the requirements for «honesty» of participants in civil relations are only «supposed to» as well as the reasonableness and fairness of their actions in fact.

Popov V.., (2014), DIFFICULTIES OF SATISFACTORI LEGISLATIVE AUTHORIZATION PROBLEMS OF «CONSCIENTIOUSNESS» IN CIVIL LAW. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 6 => 64-67.

Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii, prinyataya vsenarodnym golosovaniem 12 dekabrya 1993 goda // Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii Tekst - Moskva, Omega- L, 2013. - 39 s.
Konstitutsiya Respubliki Kazakhstan, prinyataya na respublikanskom referendume 30 avgusta 1995 goda // Konstitutsiya Respubliki Kazakhstan Tekst - Almaty, Norma-K, 2002. - 44 s.
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii. // Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii: chasti 1, 2, 3 i 4 Tekst - Moskva, Eksmo, 2011. - 656 s.
FZ RF № 302- FZ ot 30.12.2012 g. O vnesenii izmeneniy v glavy 1, 2, 3 i 4 chasti pervoy GK RF .
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan. // Grazhdanskiy kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan: chasti obshchaya i osobennaya Tekst - Almaty, Norma- K, 2011. - 360 s.
Grazhdanskiy protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii. // Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii Tekst - Moskva, Prospekt, 2005. - 192 s.
Grazhdanskiy protsessual nyy kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan. // Grazhdanskiy kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan Tekst - Almaty, Norma-K, 2011. - 184 s.
Ugolovno- protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii. // Ugolovno- protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii Tekst - Moskva, Prospekt, 2013. - 256 s.
Ugolovno- protsessual nyy kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan. // Grazhdanskiy kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan Tekst - Almaty, Norma-K, 2013. - 300 s.
Federal nyy Zakon Rossiyskoy Federatsii Ob okhrane okruzhayushchey sredy , prinyatyy FZ RF № 7 ot 10 yanvarya 2002 goda // Federal nyy Zakon Ob okhrane okruzhayushchey sredy Tekst - Moskva, Omega- L, 2014. - 44 s.
Ekologicheskiy kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan, prinyatyy Zakonom RK № 212- III ot 9 yanvarya 2009 goda // Ekologicheskiy kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan Tekst - Almaty, Norma-K, 2008. - 176 s.
Suleymenov, M.K. Dobrosovestnost v grazhdanskom prave: problemy teorii i praktiki. Tekst - Dobrosovestnost v grazhdanskom prave: Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno- prakticheskoy konferentsii v ramkakh ezhegodnykh tsivilisticheskikh chteniy. Almaty, 22- 23 maya 2014 / Almaty, izd. Kaspiyskogo obshchestvennogo universiteta, 2014.
Gribanov, V.P. Predely osushchestvleniya i zashchity grazhdanskikh prav. Tekst - M., 1992. - s. 321.
Vinichenko, YU.V. Istoricheskie nachala sosedskogo prava v Rossii: monografiya. Tekst - Irkutsk, Institut zakonodatel stva i pravovoy informatsii im. M.M. Speranskogo, 2012. - s. 84.
Isaev, I.A. Tenevaya storona zakona. Irratsional noe v prave: monografiya. Tekst - M., Progress, 2013 - s. 368.
Ryzhenkov, A.YA. Printsip dobrosovestnosti v obnovlyennom grazhdanskom zakonodatel stve. Tekst // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2013, № 3. - s. 68- 71.
Ayzetkulova, N.A. Sistema pravovykh stimulov i pravovykh ogranicheniy investitsionnoy deyatel nosti v sfere predprinimatel stva: sushchnost , struktura, vzaimosvyazi elementov. // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2013, № 6. - s. 110- 113.
SHevtsov, S.G. Kontseptual nye osnovy ustanovleniya predelov svobodnogo usmotreniya sub ektov grazhdanskikh pravootnosheniy. // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2012, № 3. - s. 82- 85.
Karimullina A.E. Pravovye stimuly i pravovye ogranicheniya v grazhdansko-pravovom regulirovanii obyazatel nogo strakhovaniya. // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2012, № 2. - s. 107- 109.
SHevtsov, S.G. Sootnoshenie vozmozhnosti usmotreniya i neobkhodimosti v aspekte tselesoobraznosti. // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2012, № 1. - s. 57- 60.
CHukhnenko, V.V. Doveritel noe upravlenie imushchestvom, prinadlezhashchim gosudarstvu. // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2012, № 1. - s. 95- 97.

the impediment to seamless introduction into national law of "good faith", try to resolve problems in the legislation, the need to develop acceptable regulatory formulas.