Gaps in Russian Legislation Issue №6 — 2017

PETITION OF A DEFENSE ATTORNEY FOR THE RECOGNITION OF EVIDENCE IS INADMISSIBLE IN PROCEEDINGS IN JURY TRIALS
( Pp. 297-301)

Firsov Sergey Nikolaevich. Kalinkina Lyubov Danilovna Sotkova Vasilina V.

Firsov Sergey Nikolaevich. Dolzhnost: starshiy prepodavatel. Podrazdelenie: kafedra ugolovnogo processa, pravosudiya i prokurorskogo nadzora
National research Mordovia State University named after N.P. Ogaryov Kalinkina Lyubov Danilovna Cand.Sci.(Law), Associate Professor, Honorary Lawyer of the Russian Federation, Honored Lawyer of the Republic of Mordovia, Head of the Criminal Procedure, Justice and prosecutorial supervision Department, Law institute
National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University
Saransk, Russian Federation Sotkova Vasilina V. starshiy prepodavatel kafedry ugolovnogo processa, pravosudiya i prokurorskogo nadzora yuridicheskogo fakulteta
N.P. Ogaryov Mordovia State University

Abstract:

The article deals with the problematic issues of application of the defense lawyer's petitions and the recognition of evidence inadmissible in the consideration of criminal cases in court with the participation of jurors, as well as negative tendencies of law enforcement practice in the resolution of the said applications by the court. In particular, the author pays special attention to the form of making applications for recognizing evidence inadmissible, their content, as well as the legislative grounds for the recognition of evidence inadmissible.

How to Cite:

Firsov S.N., Kalinkina L.D., Sotkova V.V., (2017), PETITION OF A DEFENSE ATTORNEY FOR THE RECOGNITION OF EVIDENCE IS INADMISSIBLE IN PROCEEDINGS IN JURY TRIALS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 6 => 297-301.

Reference list:

O primenenii sudami norm Ugolovno-protsessual nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii, reguliruyushchikh sudoproizvodstvo s uchastiem prisyazhnykh zasedateley: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii №23 ot 22 noyabrya 2005 g. URL: http://www.supcourt.ru/vscourt detale.php id 2834.
KHorosheva A.E. Problemnye voprosy rassmotreniya khodataystv zashchity o nedopustimosti dokazatel stv v sude prisyazhnykh po ugolovnym delam ob ubiystvakh URL: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/problem-nye-voprosy-rassmotreniya-hodataystv-zaschity-o-nedopustimosti-dokazatelstv-v-sude-prisyazhnyh-po-ugolovnym-delam-ob-ubiystvah.
Kalinkina L.D. Zayavlenie i razreshenie khodataystv o priznanii dokazatel stv nedopustimymi v sude pervoy instantsii v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse: uchebnoe posobie / L. D. Kalinkina. - Saransk, 2014. - S. 4.
O primenenii sudami norm Ugolovno-protsessual nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii, reguliruyushchikh sudoproizvodstvo s uchastiem prisyazhnykh zasedateley: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii №23 ot 22 noyabrya 2005 g. // http://www.supcourt.ru/vscourt detale.php id 2834.
O nekotorykh voprosakh primeneniya sudami Konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii pri osushchestvlenii pravosudiya: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii №8 ot 31 oktyabrya 1995 goda (s izmeneniyami ot 6 fevralya 2007 g. № 5, ot 16 aprelya 2013 g. № 9 i ot 3 marta 2015 g. № 9) URL: http://www.supcourt.ru/vscourt detale.php id 938.
Balakshin V.S. Nedopustimye dokazatel stva: ponyatie i pravovaya priroda URL: https://superinf.ru/ view helpstud.php id 706.
Ugolovnoe delo №2-1/2016 // Arkhiv Verkhovnogo suda Respubliki Mordoviya. 2016.
Cm.: Protokol sudebnogo zasedaniya po ugolovnomu delu №2-1/2016. S. 335-336 // Arkhiv Verkhovnogo suda Respubliki Mordoviya. 2016.
O primenenii sudami norm Ugolovno-protsessual nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii, reguliruyushchikh sudoproizvodstvo s uchastiem prisyazhnykh zasedateley: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii №23 ot 22 noyabrya 2005 g. URL: http://www.supcourt.ru/vscourt detale.php id 2834.
Cm.: Protokol sudebnogo zasedaniya po ugolovnomu delu №2-1/2016. S. 343 // Arkhiv Verkhovnogo suda Respubliki Mordoviya. 2016.
O primenenii sudami norm Ugolovno-protsessual nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii, reguliruyushchikh sudoproizvodstvo s uchastiem prisyazhnykh zasedateley.

Keywords:

trial, defense attorney, the jury, the petition, inadmissible evidence.

1. SCIENTIFIC SCHOOL OF DOCTOR OF SCIENCE, PROFESSOR SHCHERBA SERGEJ PETROVICH Pages: 19-23 Issue №9149

THE CIRCUMSTANCES THAT LEAD TO HELPLESSNESS STATE of criminal victim

Sarsenbayev Talgat Esenalievich

helpless condition of the victim a preliminary investigation trial criminal proceedings

6. Criminal procedure Pages: 216-218 Issue №4539

Features of the application, review and resolution of complaints and petitions in criminal proceedings at the trial stage

Zelenskaya Juliya Evgenievna

the complaint statement basis features process

9. Judicial, prosecutorial, human rights and law enforcement activities Pages: 304-305 Issue №3884

The scientific approach to a new direction in «advocatology» (legal profession)

Baibulatov Anzor Mavsurovich

the criminal process defense attorney lawyer criminal proceedings legislation advocacy Institute

8. Criminal procedure Pages: 302-304 Issue №10864

Comparative legal analysis of the current criminal procedural legislation of the Russian Federation and criminal procedure legislation of foreign countries on certain issues of jury trials

Shigurova Elena I.

jurors selection Board the composition of the court jurisdiction

13. Administrative law; Administrative process Pages: 264-265 Issue №12615

Motion to dismiss the case on an administrative offense

Kodzokova Lyatsa Arsenievna

the petition participants administrative proceedings denial determination and the decision on the petition

19. Forensics; Forensic expertise; Operational and search activities Pages: 286-288 Issue №3758

The separate issues of acquiring and termination of procedural status of participants of criminal legal proceedings

Maltseva Angelina Anatolyevna

criminal proceedings a gap in the law the analogy of law legal status the jury

12. OTHER Pages: 250-252 Issue №9342

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE IN THE APPEAL PROCEEDINGS IN CRIMINAL CASES

Makeeva Inna Vladimirovna

the appeal proceedings the court of appeal appeal trial

17. Judicial, prosecutorial, human rights and law enforcement activities Pages: 270-274 Issue №12273

THE PERMISSIONS AND PROHIBITIONS IN THE DEFENDING SPEECH OF THE LAWYER IN JURY TRIAL

Kalinkina Lyubov Danilovna

Sotkova Vasilina V.

protection ban permission the jury saving it

3. CRIMINALISTIC, PROCEDURAL AND OPERATIVE-SEARCH MEASURES TO COUNTER CRIME IN THE GLOBALIZATION CONDITIONS Pages: 239-241 Issue №16988

Institute of inadmissible evidence in criminal proceedings

Surtsev Alexander Vladimirovich

admissibility legality inadmissible evidence criminal process

CRIMINAL PROCESS (12.00.09) Pages: 316-322 Issue №19590

New Approach to the Classification of Interim Judgments

Zakaryan Sarkis Armenovich

interim court decisions decisions ensuring the execution of a sentence decisions on extradition appointment of criminal proceedings pre-trial stage

PETITION OF A DEFENSE ATTORNEY FOR THE RECOGNITION OF EVIDENCE IS INADMISSIBLE IN PROCEEDINGS IN JURY TRIALS
( Pp. 297-301)

Related Articles

Journal Indexing

PETITION OF A DEFENSE ATTORNEY FOR THE RECOGNITION OF EVIDENCE IS INADMISSIBLE IN PROCEEDINGS IN JURY TRIALS ( Pp. 297-301)

Related Articles

Journal Indexing

PETITION OF A DEFENSE ATTORNEY FOR THE RECOGNITION OF EVIDENCE IS INADMISSIBLE IN PROCEEDINGS IN JURY TRIALS
( Pp. 297-301)