RULES OF CONSTRUCTION QUALIFYING AND PREFERRED ELEMENTS OF THE CRIME
( Pp. 172-178)

More about authors
Rogova Evgeniya Viktorovna k.yu.n. docent, doktorant kafedry ugolovnoy politiki i organizacii preduprezhdeniya prestupleniy. Mesto ucheby: Akademiya upravleniya MVD Rossii
Abstract:
The paper proposes solution to some problems related to the legislative embodiment and application of aggravating and privileged elements of the crime , which is one of the means of differentiation of criminal responsibility. The main criteria for their selection. Inconsistency circumstances one of the main criteria for evidence of the impossibility of its legislative regulation . The author also reviews the rules of qualified design and preferred types of crimes with their division into those that relate to the content and those that relate to the form. When securing the qualifying and preferred features necessary to minimize the signs of estimates , the vague wording of terminological inconsistency. It is suitable for the presentation of aggravating circumstances «cluster» principle. In the General Part of the Criminal Code should establish a chapter on legislative interpretation of the most difficult to understand the law- qualifying and preferred features.
How to Cite:
Rogova E.V., (2013), RULES OF CONSTRUCTION QUALIFYING AND PREFERRED ELEMENTS OF THE CRIME. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 5 => 172-178.
Reference list:
O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii i otdel nye zakonodatel nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Federal nyy zakon RF ot 7 dekabrya 2011 g. № 420-FZ // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 9 dekabrya 2011. № 5654.
Vasil evskiy A.V. YUridicheskaya tekhnika zakrepleniya v ugolovnom zakone differentsiruyushchikh ugolovnuyu otvetstvennost obstoyatel stv // Normotvorcheskaya i pravoprimenitel naya tekhnika v ugolovnom i ugolovno-protsessual nom prave. Sb. nauch. statey. YAroslavl : Izd-vo YArosl. un-ta, 2000. S. 99-107.
Volzhenkin B.V. O differentsiatsii otvetstvennosti za korruptsionnye pravonarusheniya (Iz opyta razrabotki proekta Zakona o bor be s korruptsiey) // Differentsiatsiya otvetstvennosti v ugolovnom prave i protsesse. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov - YAroslavl : Izd-vo YArosl. un-ta, 1994. S. 160-168.
Golovnenkov P.V. Ugolovnoe ulozhenie (Ugolovnyy kodeks) Federativnoy Respubliki Germaniya: nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy i perevod teksta zakona. 2-e izd., pereab. I dop. M.: Prospekt, 2013. 312 s.
Gribov A.S. Differentsiatsiya otvetstvennosti za ekonomicheskie prestupleniya v Rossii, FRG i SSHA: sravnitel no-pravovoe issledovanie: Avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk. - YAroslavl , 2011. 26 s.
Kobzeva E.V. Teoriya otsenochnykh priznakov v ugolovnom zakone / Nauch. red. N.A. Lopashenko. M.: YUrlitinform, 2009. 264 s.
Kostareva T.A. Kvalifitsiruyushchie obstoyatel stva v ugolovnom prave: ponyatie, zakonodatel naya reglamentatsiya, vliyanie na differentsiatsiyu otvetstvennosti/ T.A.Kostareva. YAroslavl : Izd-vo YAGU, 1993. 234 s.
Kruglikov L.L. O konstruirovanii kvalifitsirovannykh sostavov prestupleniy // Pravovedenie. - 1989. - № 2. S. 43-49.
Kruglikov L.L., Vasil evskiy A.V. Differentsiatsiya otvetstvennosti v ugolovnom prave. SPb.: YUrid. tsentr Press, 2002. 300 s.
Kruglikov L.L., Smirnova L.E. Unifikatsiya v ugolovnom prave. SPb.: Izd-vo R. Aslanova YUridicheskiy tsentr Press , 2008. 285 s.
Kruglikov L.L., Solov ev O.G. Prestupleniya v sfere ekonomicheskoy deyatel nosti i nalogooblozheniya: (Voprosy konstruirovaniya sostavov i differentsiatsii otvetstvennosti) / Pod obshch. red. L.L. Kruglikova. YAroslavl .: Izd-vo YArosl. gos. un-ta, 2003. 224 s.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Obshchaya teoriya kvalifikatsii prestupleniy. M.: YUrid. lit., 1972. 352 s.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Ob ektivnaya storona prestupleniya. M.: Gosyurizdat, 1960. 244 s.
Lesnievski-Kostareva T.A. Differentsiatsiya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti: Teoriya i zakonodatel naya praktika. M: Izdatel stvo NORMA, 1998. 296 s.
Lopashenko N.A. Eshche raz ob otsenochnykh kategoriyakh v zakonodatel nykh formulirovkakh prestupleniy v sfere ekonomicheskoy deyatel nosti // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2002. - № 2. S.42-45.
Lopashenko N.A. Nedostatki zakonodatel noy tekhniki ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossii kak prepyatstvie dlya ego effektivnogo primeneniya i kriminogennyy faktor // Mezhdunarodnoe i natsional noe ugolovnoe zakonodatel stvo: problemy yuridicheskoy tekhniki. Materialy III Mezhdunar. nauch.-praktich. konf., sostoyavsheysya na yurid. fak. MGU im. M.V. Lomonosova 29-30 maya 2003 g. - M., 2004. S. 38-49.
Maksimov S.V. UK na pereput e. Stoit li forsirovat rabotu nad novym kodeksom. Elektronnyy resurs .- Rezhim dostupa: http://www.rg.ru/2011/06/07/ uk.html (data obrashcheniya 21.09.13)
Pobegaylo E.F. Problemy differentsiatsii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za tyazhkie nasil stvennye prestupleniya // Sovershenstvovanie pravovykh mer bor by s prestupnost yu. Vladivostok: Izd-vo DVGU, 1986. S. 24-30.
Svinkin A.I. Optimal noe konstruirovanie kvalifitsirovannykh sostavov po priznakam povtornosti i retsidiva // Problemy effektivnosti ugolovnogo zakona. Sverdlovsk: Sverd. yurid. in-t, 1975. S. 35-37.
Svinkin A.I. Priznaki lichnosti prestupnika v roli kvalifitsiruyushchikh obstoyatel stv // Problemy sovetskogo ugolovnogo prava i kriminologii. - Sverdlovsk: Sverd. yurid. in-t, 1973. S. 60-62.
Filimonov V.D. Kriminologicheskie osnovy ugolovnogo prava. Tomsk: Izd-vo Tomsk. un-ta, 1981. 214 s.
Rogova E.V. Predposylki formirovaniya ucheniya o differentsiatsii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti v teorii ugolovnogo prava na sovremennom etape // Biznes v zakone. Mezhdunarodnyy ekonomiko-yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2012. №3. S.105-108.
Keywords:
differentiation of the criminal liability, qualifying features, privilegiada signs, the offense.


Related Articles

1. SCIENTIFIC SCHOOL OF DOCTOR OF SCIENCE, PROFESSOR LOPASHENKO N.A. Pages: 32-36 Issue №10864
Fraud in the field of entrepreneurship in the wording 2016: was another attempt of the legislator successful?
fraud fraud in the sphere of entrepreneurial activities sanctions significant large and extra large size
Show more
5. Criminal; Criminal enforcement law Pages: 156-158 Issue №8598
On the problem of criminalization and decriminalization of fraud in business
fraud fraud in the sphere of entrepreneurial activities qualification of a crime the offense criminalization
Show more
5. Criminal; Criminal enforcement law Pages: 222-225 Issue №5584
Problems of qualification of vandalism
vandalism qualification of crimes public place objective evidence desecration
Show more
5. Criminal; Criminal enforcement law Pages: 169-171 Issue №4982
PREMEDITATED CRIMES COMMITTED BY BODIES OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS AS AN AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCE AT AWARDING PUNISHMENT
the employee of body of internal Affairs an aggravating circumstance differentiation of the criminal liability the principle of equality
Show more
5. Criminal law Pages: 145-148 Issue №3884
DESIGN ISSUES IN CRIMINAL LAW QUALIFYING SIGNS SLANDER (p.p. 2-5 art. 1281 of the Criminal Code)
slander qualifying features the honor and dignity of the individual the spread of false information
Show more
5. Criminal; Criminal enforcement law Pages: 149-153 Issue №4285
The correspondence of the institute of criminal law action in time and the moment of perpetration the crime
the effect of the criminal law in time the time of the crime the offense
Show more
7. Criminal law, Criminal enforcement law, Criminology Pages: 160-162 Issue №8046
On the problem of the definition of the generic and specific object of the offense under Art. 159.6 of the Criminal Code
crime fraud computer information the offense a generic object
Show more
7. Criminal law, Criminal enforcement law, Criminology Pages: 152-156 Issue №8046
METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE CRIMINAL LAW
legal technology criminal law techniques design the norm the offense
Show more
5. Criminal; Criminal enforcement law Pages: 119-122 Issue №5413
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PUNISHMENT APPOINTMENT FOR CRIME COMMITTED BY GROUP, GROUP WITH PRELIMINARY AGREEMENT, ORGANIZED GROUP AND CRIMINAL ASSOCIATION
group crime the sentencing the degree of public danger qualifying features differentiation of punishment
Show more
2. Theory and history of law and state; History of law and State teachings Pages: 52-56 Issue №3370
Zoroastrian law and the problem of classification of crimes
Avesta crimes criminal penalties complicity wine
Show more