FEATURES FUNCTION INTERPRETATION OF LAWS
( Pp. 45-49)

More about authors
Garnik Lyudmila Yurievna Dolzhnost: starshiy prepodavatel. Podrazdelenie: obedinennyy fakultet, kafedra grazhdansko-pravovyh disciplin.
Moscow State University named after S.Y. Witte. Branch: Nizhny Novgorod branch Migunova Tatiana Leonidovna Dr.Sci.(Law), Professor, Head of the Theory and History of State and Law Department, Institute of Management, Economics and Law
Volga State University of Water Transport
Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
Abstract:
In this article the author attempts on the basis of a brief analysis of lawmaking and law enforcement functions to characterize the interpretation of the law. The author describes a wide range of areas of impact of legal norms on social relations that determines the presence in their interpretation of a set of functions and emphasizes that the research function must not take place in isolation but in conjunction with each other, ie. E. In a single system.
How to Cite:
Garnik L.Y., Migunova T.L., (2015), FEATURES FUNCTION INTERPRETATION OF LAWS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 5 => 45-49.
Reference list:
Alekseev A.A. Problemy teorii prava: Kurs lektsiy. T. 2. Sverdlovsk, 1973. - S. 172-173.
Alekseev A.A. Problemy teorii prava: Kurs lektsiy. T. 2. Sverdlovsk, 1973. - S.161.
Alekseev S.S. Problemy teorii gosudarstva i prava, pod red. - M., YUridicheskaya literatura. - S. 395.
Borisov V.V. Pravovoy poryadok razvitogo sotsializma: Voprosy teorii. - Saratov, 1977. -S. 312-314.
Voplenko H.H. Sotsialisticheskaya zakonnost i primenenie prava. - Saratov, 1983. - S.104.
Voplenko H.H. Ofitsial noe tolkovanie norm prava. - M., 1976. - S. 6-7.
Voplenko H.H. Ofitsial noe tolkovanie norm prava. - M., 1976. - S. 16.
Kartashov V.N. Vvedenie v obshchuyu teoriyu pravovoy sistemy obshchestva. - CH. 4: Interpretatsionnaya yuridicheskaya praktika: Tekst lektsiy. - YAroslavl : YAroslavskiy gos. universitet, 1998.- S.61-70.
Miroshnichenko D.A. Interpretatsiya prava kak problema yuridicheskoy praktiki // Ekonomicheskie i gumanitarnye issledovaniya regionov. - 2011. -№ 1. - S. 91.
Polovova L.V. Funktsii interpretatsionnoy praktiki : Dis.. kand. yurid. nauk : 12.00.01 / Polovova Lada Vladimirovna - YAroslavl , 2001. - S. 25.
Rad ko T.N. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava. M., - 2009. - S. 320.
Federal nyy konstitutsionnyy zakon ot 21.03.2014 № 6-FKZ O prinyatii v Rossiyskuyu Federatsiyu Respubliki Krym i obrazovanii v sostave Rossiyskoy Federatsii novykh sub ektov - Respubliki Krym i goroda federal nogo znacheniya Sevastopolya (v red. ot 31.12.2014 g.) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. - 2014. - № 12. - st. 1201
CHerdantsev A.F. Gnoseologicheskaya priroda tolkovaniya prava // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. - 1972. -№.11.- S.105-109; CHerdantsev A.F. Tolkovanie sovetskogo prava. - M.: YUrid. lit., 1979. - S. 15-34;
CHerdantsev A.F. Voprosy tolkovaniya sovetskogo prava. - M.: YUrid. lit., 1979 - S. 186-187.
SHaburov A.C. Tolkovanie norm prava // Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: Uchebnik dlya yur. vuzov i fakul tetov / Pod. red. V.M.Korel skogo i V.D.Perevalova. - M., 1998. - S.373.
Keywords:
differentiation of functions, a holistic education system, interpretation practice, intermediate stage, the process of understanding and clarification.


Related Articles