REASONABLE TIME IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS
( Pp. 110-114)

The article deals with problems of a reasonable length of the proceedings - the institution is relatively new to the national procedural law, aimed at establishing the legal system of the Russian Federation an additional mechanism to protect the rights of citizens and organizations in the form of an award of compensation for breach of the reasonable length of proceedings. Presented article is based on a detailed analysis of the causes and circumstances of the legislative consolidation the Institute of awarding compensation for the violation of the right to trial within a reasonable time and to make changes in the Russian legislation related to the introduction of the concept of "reasonable time" trial and the procedural mechanism of awarding compensation breach of that term. The paper analyzes the category of "reasonable time" is determined by its legal nature and the ratio of this category with the concept of "legal time". The work can be useful for further study of the assessment category, for judges, determining the reasonableness of the terms of legal proceedings, the parties of the civil action to accelerate the process, as well as all those who are interested in this issue.

Rzhaksensky S.., (2015), REASONABLE TIME IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 4 => 110-114.

Belyakova A.V. Protsessual nye i razumnye sroki v sisteme protsessual nykh garantiy v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom sudoproizvodstve. //Advokat. 2014. N 6. / SPS Konsul tantPlyus .
Belyakova A.V. Sootnoshenie ponyatiy svoevremennost i razumnyy srok sudoproizvodstva v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom sudoproizvodstve // Pravo i ekonomika. 2014. N 4 / SPS Konsul tantPlyus
Borisov A.N. Kommentariy k Federal nomu zakonu ot 30 aprelya 2010 g. N 68-FZ quot;O kompensatsii za narushenie prava na sudoproizvodstvo v razumnyy srok ili prava na ispolnenie sudebnogo akta v razumnyy srok quot; (postateynyy). - M., 2011. // SPS Konsul tant-Plyus .
Borisova L.V. Printsip razumnosti v rossiyskom grazhdanskom protsesse. M., 2008. S. 22 - 23.
Brant I.N. Faktory, vliyayushchie na svoevremennost rassmotreniya grazhdanskikh del // Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess. 2004. N 4. S. 3.
Glazkova M.E. Kompensatsiya za narushenie razumnogo sroka v arbitrazhnom protsesse: tseli vnedreniya i problemy pravoprimeneniya // Advokat. 2010. N 9.
Grazhdanskiy protsess: Uchebnik / pod red. M.K. Treushnikova. M., 5-e izdanie, pererabotannoe i dopolnennoe.//M., 2014. S. 203
Gromoshina N.A. Kodeks administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva: otsenka perspektiv. / Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa. 2013. N 3. S. 49.
Lebedev V.M. Stanovlenie i razvitie sudebnoy vlasti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. M., 2000. S. 199.
Slepchenko E.V. Grazhdanskoe sudoproizvodstvo: obshchaya kharakteristika i tendentsii razvitiya // Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa. 2012. N 2. / SPS Konsul tantPlyus .
CHerkashin V.A. Razumnost v grazhdanskom protsesse: sushchnost i perspektivy //Rossiyskiy sud ya. 2011. N 6
KHasanshin I.A. Ponyatie i vidy protsessual nykh garantiy v tsivilisticheskom protsesse // Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess. 2013. N 1. S. 21.

a reasonable time, compensation for the violation of the right to trial within a reasonable time, procedural time limits in civil proceedings.