Some gaps in the legal regulation of the procedural forms of evidence in administrative cases
( Pp. 180-182)

The article deals with the concept and essence of evidences in administrative cases. The author draws attention to the imperfection of the legal regulation of such procedural form of fixing evidences in administrative cases as the decision to institute administrative case, which is made by the prosecutor in accordance with Article 28.4. of the Code of Administrative Offences, and makes recommendations to improve current Russian administrative legislation.

Nobel A.R., (2013), SOME GAPS IN THE LEGAL REGULATION OF THE PROCEDURAL FORMS OF EVIDENCE IN ADMINISTRATIVE CASES. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 4 => 180-182.

Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30 dekabrya 2001 goda № 195-FZ. Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF , 07.01.2002, № 1 (ch. 1), st. 1.
Kommentariy k KoAP RF pod obshchey redaktsiey N.G. Salishevoy, izdanie 7. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistema Konsul tantPlyus .
Treushnikov M.K. Sudebnye dokazatel stva. M., 1999. S. 87.
Ozhegov S.I. Slovar russkogo yazyka/pod red. SHvedovoy N.YU. M.: 1984. S. 153.
Spasovich V.D. Izbrannye trudy i rechi / Sost. I.V. Potapchuk. Tula: Avtograf , 2000. S. 17.

proof and proving in cases of administrative offenses, the decision of the Prosecutor to initiate a case on administrative offense.