Efficiency of norms of complicity in the context of construction of Common and Specific Part of the Criminal code of the Russian Federation
( Pp. 110-117)

More about authors
Petrushenkov Alexandr N. kandidat yuridicheskih nauk, docent; docent kafedry gumanitarno-pravovyh disciplin Dzerzhinskogo filiala
Dzerzhinsk branch of the Lobachevsky State University
Abstract:
In this research types of accomplices established in the 33-d article of the Criminal code of the Russian Federation are analyzed. Their characteristics are examined in coordination with other articles of Common and Specific Part of the Criminal code of the Russian Federation. Proposals to simplification and upgrading of common criminal-law norms about accomplices in the context of its realization in the Specific Part of the Criminal code of the Russian Federation are made. In order to improve the codification process new definitions of types of accomplices are proposed with consideration of consistency and logical connectivity principles.
How to Cite:
Petrushenkov A.N., (2015), EFFICIENCY OF NORMS OF COMPLICITY IN THE CONTEXT OF CONSTRUCTION OF COMMON AND SPECIFIC PART OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 2 => 110-117.
Reference list:
Traynin A.N. Izbrannye trudy / Sostavlenie, vstupitel naya stat ya dokt. yurid. nauk, professora N.F. Kuznetsovoy. SPb., 2004.
Piontkovskiy A.A. Uchenie o prestuplenii po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu. M., 1961.
Kozlov A.P. Souchastie: traditsii i real nost . SPb., 2001.
Tel nov P.F. Otvetstvennost za souchastie v prestuplenii. M., 1974.
Arutyunov A.A. Souchastie v prestuplenii. M., 2013 // SPS Konsul tantPlyus .
Svyatenyuk N. Differentsiatsiya otvetstvennosti i individualizatsiya nakazaniya za prestuplenie, sovershennoe v souchastii // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2008. № 3.
Punkt 15 Postanovleniya Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 27.12.2002 g. № 29 O sudebnoy praktike po delam o krazhe, grabezhe i razboe // Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2003. № 2.
Punkt 6 Postanovleniya Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 9.02.2012 g. № 1 O nekotorykh voprosakh sudebnoy praktiki po ugolovnym delam o prestupleniyakh terroristicheskoy napravlennosti // Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2012. № 4.
Punkt 10 Postanovleniya Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 27.01.1999 g. № 1 O sudebnoy praktike po delam ob ubiystve (st. 105 UK RF) // Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 1999. № 3.
Burchak F.G. Uchenie o souchastii po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu. Kiev, 1970.
Punkt 10 Postanovleniya Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 04.12.2014 g. № 16 O sudebnoy praktike po delam o prestupleniyakh protiv polovoy neprikosnovennosti i polovoy svobody lichnosti // Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2015. № 2.
Osuzhdennaya obosnovanno priznana soispolnitelem v sovershenii iznasilovaniya gruppoy lits: Opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 4 sentyabrya 2007 g. № 9-O07-61 // Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2008. № 5.
Prigovor ot 20 iyunya 1997 goda // Arkhiv Verkhovnogo Suda Respubliki KHakasiya.
Punkt 22 Postanovleniya Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 27.12.2007 g. № 51 O sudebnoy praktike po delam o moshennichestve, prisvoenii i rastrate // Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2008. № 2.
Punkt 17 Postanovleniya Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 03.04.2008 g. № 3 O praktike rassmotreniya sudami ugolovnykh del ob uklonenii ot prizyva na voennuyu sluzhbu i ot prokhozhdeniya voennoy ili al ternativnoy grazhdanskoy sluzhby // Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2008. № 6.
Punkt 15 Postanovleniya Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 09.07.2013 g. № 24 O sudebnoy praktike po delam o vzyatochnichestve i ob inykh korruptsionnykh prestupleniyakh // Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2013. № 9.
Ivanov N. Souchastie so spetsial nym sub ektom // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2001. № 3.
Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 03.07.2014 g. № 11-APU14-22 // SPS Konsul tantPlyus .
Grishaev P.I., Kriger G.A. Souchastie po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu. M., 1956.
Andreev I.V. Teoretiko-pravovye osnovy kvalifikatsii prestupleniy: avtoref. diss. kand. yurid. nauk. Omsk, 2000.
Abakarov Z.A. Otvetstvennost za podstrekatel stvo k soversheniyu prestupleniya po rossiyskomu ugolovnomu pravu: avtoref. diss. kand. yurid. nauk. Saratov, 2006.
Bezborodov D.A. Ugolovno-pravovoe i kriminologicheskoe issledovanie podstrekatel stva: avtoref. diss. kand. yurid. nauk. SPb, 1998.
Mirzoyan V.G. Podstrekatel stvo k soversheniyu prestupleniya v rossiyskom i zarubezhnom ugolovnom prave: avtoref. diss. kand. yurid. nauk. Krasnodar, 2012.
SHubina V.YU. Institut posobnichestva v sovershenii prestupleniya: ugolovno-pravovoy i kriminologicheskie aspekty: avtoref. diss. kand. yurid. nauk. Krasnodar, 2012.
Ershov S.A. Posobnichestvo v Obshchey i Osobennoy chastyakh UK RF: avtoref. diss. kand. yurid. nauk. Saratov, 2014.
Kosareva T.I. Posobnichestvo soversheniyu prestupleniya: avtoref. diss. kand. yurid. nauk. Ryazan , 2004.
Petrushenkov A.N. Teoreticheskie osnovy vzaimodeystviya Obshchey i Osobennoy chasti v Ugolovnom kodekse RSFSR 1960 goda // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2014. - № 1. - S. 106 - 110.
Petrushenkov A.N. Kompozitsiya ugolovno-pravovykh norm Obshchey i Osobennoy chastey v zakonodatel stve Ukrainy, Latvii i Bolgarii // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2014. - № 3. - S. 127 - 133.
Keywords:
types of accomplices of a crime, the contractor and the co-perpetrator of the crimes, the organizer of the crime, instigator and accomplice commit a crime, criminal liability of accomplices, implementation of the provisions on accomplices in the articles of the Special part of the criminal code.


Related Articles

CRIMINAL LAW Pages: 102-107 Issue №72283
Responsibility of the Organizer of the Crime: Problems of Qualification of Criminal Actions
complicity the organizer of the crime qualification of the crime the leadership.
Show more
УГОЛОВНО-ПРАВОВЫЕ НАУКИ (СПЕЦИАЛЬНОСТЬ 5.1.4.) Pages: 233-238 Issue №24364
The Organizer of the Crime: the Concept and Criminal Legal Meaning
complicity the organizer of the crime the objective side the leadership.
Show more
5. Criminal; Criminal enforcement law Pages: 212-217 Issue №5584
Perfection of rules of sentencing for the crime, committed in complicity
differentiation of punishment complicity the sentencing the organizer of the crime the instigator
Show more