“The alleged complicity” as the circumstance excluding the criminality of officials carrying out operational investigative activities and persons assisting them
( Pp. 141-144)

The article deals with current issues of legal protection of operatives engaged in operational investigative activities and the persons assisting them. The article also give proposals to increase the effectiveness of legal protection and considers legal measures on Amendments to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.

Bilyk V.I., Petrasheva N.V., (2016), “THE ALLEGED COMPLICITY” AS THE CIRCUMSTANCE EXCLUDING THE CRIMINALITY OF OFFICIALS CARRYING OUT OPERATIONAL INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES AND PERSONS ASSISTING THEM. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 1 => 141-144.

Stat ya Mify v informatsionnoy voyne protiv GUEBiPK MVD Rossii ot 24.02.2015g., sayt: PASMI.RU , data obrashcheniya: 19 noyabrya 2015 goda; Kandaurov S.I. K voprosu ob otgranichenii operativnogo eksperimenta i proverochnoy zakupki ot provokatsii ili podstrekatel stva // YUridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2014. № 3(27). S. 93-97.
Dalee po tekstu FZ Ob ORD .
chasti 4 stat i 16 FZ quot;Ob ORD quot;.
Abdullaeva N.V. Operativnoe vnedrenie v deyatel nosti operativnykh podrazdeleniy organov vnutrennikh del: avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Irkutsk, 2007. S.5.
Savinskiy A.V. O mnimom souchastii kak obstoyatel stve, isklyuchayushchem prestupnost deyaniya // Zakonnost . 2005. N 10. S. 32-34.
Sm.naprimer: SHkabin G.S. Ugolovno-pravovoy institut krayney neobkhodimosti v deyatel nosti organov vnutrennikh del. Avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata yuridicheskikh nauk. M., 2004. S. 7-9.
Mikhaylov V. Vypolnenie professional nykh funktsiy kak obstoyatel stvo, isklyuchayushchee prestupnost deyaniya // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2002. № 2. S. 51-54;
SHkabin G.S. Primenenie ugolovnogo zakona pri provedenii operativnogo vnedreniya: metodicheskie rekomendatsii / SHkabin G.S. - Ryazan : Ryazanskiy filial Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii, 2014. S. 15-16.
Savinskiy A.V. Mnimoe souchastii kak obstoyatel stve, isklyuchayushchem prestupnost deyaniya // Zakonnost . 2005. N 10. S. 32; Savinskiy A.V. O perechne obstoyatel stv, isklyuchayushchikh prestupnost deyaniya // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2014. № 5. S.57.
Savinskiy A.V. O mnimom souchastii kak obstoyatel stve, isklyuchayushchem prestupnost deyaniya // Zakonnost . 2005. N 10. S. 32 - 34.
Ozhegov C.I. Slovar russkogo yazyka// Pod redaktsiey N.YU. SHvedovoy. - 16-e izdanie, ispravlennoe. - M.: Russkiy yazyk. 1984. S.305.
Rabadanov A.S. Vypolnenie spetsial nogo zadaniya kak obstoyatel stvo, isklyuchayushchee prestupnost deyaniya // Pravovaya kul tura. 2011. № 1(10). S. 100-104;
Radchenko E.V. Prichinenie vreda pri vypolnenii spetsial nogo zadaniya v ugolovnom zakonodatel stve zarubezhnykh stran // Sibirskiy yuridicheskiy vestnik. 2012. № 4(59). S. 69-75;
Nugumanov A.R. K voprosu ob organizatsii prestupnogo soobshchestva i uchastiya v nem // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. № 6. 2015. S. 111.

legal protection of the operational staff, individuals assisting them, circumstances, excluding criminality of act, exemption from compensation for the damage caused, the alleged complicity, the performance of a special assignment.