To a question of value of parliamentary investigations: foreign and domestic experience of development (historical and legal aspect)
( Pp. 86-89)

Purpose: Today, as well as at the beginning of the XX century sharply there is a question of a choice of the most optimum forms of a combination of relationship of the representative and executive authorities. In modern conditions when there is an influence strengthening directly of governing bodies led by the person personifying top of a pyramid of the executive authority it is necessary to determine accurately and strictly parameters of activity in which representatives of legislature are urged to be engaged. In article questions of realization of some control powers of Federal Assembly of Russia behind activity of executive bodies of the power are considered. Methodology: The historical and legal analysis of scientific and empirical literature allowed to draw a conclusion that institute of parliamentary investigations in modern Russia rather young and its influence on political and legal development of our state is insignificant. Results: The methodological basis of research was made by modern general scientific and special methods of knowledge. Complex application of methods of scientific knowledge promoted comprehensive study of parliamentary investigation as one of forms of control of representative institution of an executive branch of the power. Conclusion: Provisions and conclusions of the conducted research form a complex view of one of important questions of law - a place and a role of parliament of Russia in system of public authorities.

Baranova E.A., (2015), TO A QUESTION OF VALUE OF PARLIAMENTARY INVESTIGATIONS: FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC EXPERIENCE OF DEVELOPMENT (HISTORICAL AND LEGAL ASPECT). Gaps in Russian Legislation, 1 => 86-89.

Aseev I.A., Masalimov A.S. K voprosu o reorganizatsii politsii Rossiyskoy imperii posle revolyutsii 1905-1907 godov // Vestnik VEGU. № 4. 2014.
Bulakov O.N. K voprosu o deyatel nosti parlamenta v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2013. № 2.
Grishchenko N. Uotergeyt. Uroki istorii, zabytye Barakom Obamoy // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 12 iyulya. 2014.
Kazakova E.V. Parlamentskiy kontrol v sisteme razdeleniya vlastey kak neobkhodimyy element predstavitel noy demokratii // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2014. № 6.
Kovryakova E.V. Osobennosti parlamentskogo kontrolya v parlamentarnoy respublike (na primere FRG) // ZHurn. ros. prava. 2004. № 6.
Komissiya Uorrena. Elektronnyy resurs . URL: kennedi.narod.ru (data obrashcheniya: 20.01.2015).
Kushman K.D. Politicheskaya sistema SSHA i kak ona deystvuet / per. s angl. M. Koryakova. - N.-Y., 1990.
Montesk ke SH. Istoriya politicheskikh i pravovykh ucheniy. Elektronnyy resurs . URL: http://www-be.bspu.unibel.by/pages/obschixxi /source/1028. html (data obrashcheniya: 03.04.2014).
CHernilovskiy Z. M. Vseobshchaya istoriya gosudarstva i prava. - M. : YUrist , 1995.
SHayo A. Samoogranichenie vlasti (kratkiy kurs konstitutsionalizma): per. s vengerskogo. - M., 2001.
Kleeton G. Trial by tribunal. - N.-Y., 1960.

Parliament, the system of checks and balances, parliamentary control, parliamentary inquiry.