Some issues on separate crime species incitement qualification
( Pp. 358-360)

More about authors
Bitov Alim Aslanovich Lecturer of the Department of Internal Affairs in Special Conditions, North Caucasian Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Federal State Educational Institution of Higher Education "Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation", Russia, Nalchik
North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Nalchik, Russia
Abstract:
If you investigated any criminal case (it does not matter what article of the Criminal code) the investigator or the inquirer have to install the necessary signs of criminal acts: form of guilt, the actions or inaction of the perpetrator, consequences, etc. In addition, it is necessary to find out the reason and motive that prompted the person to commit a particular crime. In the case of influence on the desire to commit a crime by third parties, the provocation of the crime must be established. The paper analyzes the experience of judicial practice on the issues of criminal law assessment of provocative actions that are associated with the throwing (tossing) of illegal items and substances in circulation (for example, these may be: narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances, their analogues, firearms, ammunition, and others) to a person in order to form an artificial evidence base on the part of the prosecution.
How to Cite:
Bitov A.A., (2020), SOME ISSUES ON SEPARATE CRIME SPECIES INCITEMENT QUALIFICATION. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 4 => 358-360.
Reference list:
SHumikhin V.G. Kvalifikatsiya provokatsii otdel nykh vidov prestuplenii. // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. YUridicheskie nauki. - 2015. - Vyp 2 (28). - S. 142-147.
Kushkhov R.KH. Obstoyatel stva, podlezhashchie ustanovleniyu, pri rassledovanii prestupleniy, svyazannykh s nezakonnym oborotom narkotikov // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2017. - № 3. - S. 78- 80.
Bitov A.A. Problemy otsenki materialov proverki po faktam nezakonnogo oborota narkoticheskikh sredstv // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2018. - № 3. - S. 434-436.
SHamaev A.M. Protivodeystvie nezakonnomu oborotu oruzhiya kak preventivnaya mera v antiterroristicheskoy deyatel nosti pravookhranitel nykh organov // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2019. - № 3. - S. 111.
Keywords:
provocation of a crime, incitement to a crime, planting illegal items and substances, creating artificial evidence for the prosecution, knowingly false denunciation.


Related Articles

10. Criminal law and criminology; Criminal enforcement law Pages: 163-167 Issue №15984
Delineation of non-reporting of a crime from other related crimes
failure to report a crime impunity harboring knowingly false denunciation legalization
Show more