Crimes of non-violent character against health
( Pp. 135-143)

Articles on the general characteristics of crimes against health and the criminal law regulation of art. 111 - 120 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation were published in the number 3, 4 and 5 for 2018 of our journal . This article concludes the cycle of publications devoted to the specifics of qualifying the crimes of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The matter of this article is an analysis of crimes of non-violent character against health, regulated by Art. 121 - 125 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The controversial issues that do not have a uniform interpretation in the doctrine and investigative judicial practice are commented here. A large number of scientific papers are devoted to issues of regulating liability for causing harm to health. These include the works of O.V Artyushina, E.A. Bagun, A.G.Bezverkhova, IB.Boyko, G.N. Borzenkova, S.V. Borodina, N.D. Durmanova, N.I. .Zagorodnikova, V.I. Zubkova, A.N. Ilyashenko, V.P. Kashepova, A.I. Korobeev, A.S.Nikiforova, J.S.Norvatyana, N.I.Pikurova, S.V. Rastoropova , A., K. Romanov, A. G. Romanovsky, E. L. Sidorenko, D.S. Chitlov, M.D. Shargorodsky and many other authors. Problems of responsibility for causing harm to health existing in law-enforcement practice are identified on the basis of a systematic approach and such private-scientific methods as statistical, formal-logical and comparative-legal in this article, also gaps and contradictions of criminal legislation, difficulties in the sphere of collision of norms, and terminology in criminal law are analyzed. An assessment of HIV infection as a type of harm to health is considered here, the problem of the subject matter of crimes committed in the field of medical care is analyzed in relation to art. 123, 124 of the Criminal Code, as well as the collision of norms of Art. 118 and 124 of the Criminal Code. Conclusions about the interpretation of the ambiguous terms "sexually transmitted diseases", "patient", "help to the patient", the punishability of crimes against health are made in this article.

Kazakova V.A., (2018), CRIMES OF NON-VIOLENT CHARACTER AGAINST HEALTH. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 6 => 135-143.

Bezverkhov A.G., Norvatyan YU.S. Epidemicheskie prestupleniya: voprosy kriminalizatsii i sistematizatsii // Vserossiyskiy kriminologicheskiy zhurnal. 2017. T. 11, № 3. S. 562-568.
Denisova A.V. Ugolovno-pravovye voprosy rassoglasovaniya: otraslevoy i mezhotraslevoy aspekty / Denisova A.V., Malkov V.P. - Kazan . Taglimat, 2006. 126 s.
Dyadyun K.V. Okhrana reproduktivnoy sfery kak element gendernogo podkhoda v normakh Osobennoy chasti ugolovnogo zakona RF // Voprosy sovremennoy yurisprudentsii. 2016. № 61. S. 110-121;
Dyadyun K.V. Nezakonnoe provedenie iskusstvennogo preryvaniya beremennosti: problemy razgranicheniya ot smezhnykh sostavov. // Aktual nye problemy sovershenstvovaniya zakonodatel stva i pravoprimeneniya. Materialy VI mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Evraziyskiy nauchno-issledovatel skiy institut problem prava. 2016. S. 256-259.
Il yashenko A.N. Problemnye voprosy privlecheniya k ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za prestupleniya, svyazannye s zarazheniem litsa VICH-infektsiey vsledstvie nenadlezhashchego ispolneniya meditsinskim rabotnikom svoikh professional nykh obyazannostey // Vestnik Krasnodarskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2017. № 2 (36). S. 13-16.
Kovalev A.V., Martem yanova A.A. Osobennosti ustanovleniya prichinno-sledstvennykh svyazey pri provedenii sudebno-meditsinskoy ekspertizy po faktu neokazaniya pomoshchi bol nomu // Nauchnaya shkola ugolovnogo protsessa i kriminalistiki Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta i sovremennaya yuridicheskaya nauka. Sbornik statey po materialam Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. 2016. S. 325-333.
Kommentarii k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii / otv. red. V.M.Lebedev - 14 izd., pererab. i dop. - M.: Izdatel stvo YUrayt, 2014. 1077 s. (Avtor glavy A.S.KHarlamov).
Kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii/Pod red. V.I.Radchenko, A.S.Mikhlina.- SPb.: Piter. 2007. 784 s. (Avtor glavy S.M.Zubarev).
Kurs ugolovnogo prava. Osobennaya chast . Tom 3. Uchebnik dlya vuzov. Pod red. G.N.Borzenkova, V.S.Komissarova. - M.: IKD Zertsalo-M, 2002. - 468 s. (Avtor glavy V.I.Zubkova).
Kurs rossiyskogo ugolovnogo prava. Osobennaya chast / Pod red. V.N.Kudryavtseva, A.V.Naumova. - M.: Spark, 2002. - 832 s. (Avtor glavy S.V.Borodin).
Lobanova L.V., Kamenev R.G. Ugolovno-pravovoe znachenie vozmozhnogo zarazheniya VICH-infektsiey // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2008. № 3. S. 21-25.
Lopashenko D V. Soglasie litsa na prichinenie vreda kak chastnyy element ugolovnogo prava // Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal. 2014. № 5 (16). S. 41-46.
Mal tseva N.N., Morozova E.A., Levchenko V.E., Novikov O.O., Krikun E.N. Ugolovno-pravovoy aspekt operatsii po iskusstvennomu preryvaniyu beremennosti: vozmozhnye problemy i puti ikh resheniya // Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2016. № 5. S.153-161;
Minaeva P.V. Kadochnikov D.S. Kriterii otsenki stepeni tyazhesti vreda, prichinennogo zdorov yu pri deystvii biologicheskikh faktorov (Na primere VICH) // Izbrannye voprosy sudebno-meditsinskoy ekspertizy. - KHabarovsk, 2013. - №13. - S. 135-137.
Pikurov N.I. Neokazanie pomoshchi bol nomu: kvalifikatsiya i otgranichenie ot smezhnykh sostavov// Biznes. Obrazovanie, Pravo. // Vestnik Volgogradskogo instituta biznesa. 2011. № 1 (14). S. 214. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
Romanov A.K. Aktual nye problemy ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za sovershenie VICH-relevantnykh prestupleniy // Filosofiya sotsial nykh kommunikatsiy. Volgograd. Izdatel stvo: Volgogradskiy institut ekonomiki, sotsiologii i prava. 2012. № 1. S. 87-97.
Romanovskiy A.G. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost za narusheniya v sfere reproduktivnykh tekhnologiy // Elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal Nauka. Obshchestvo. Gosudarstvo . Esj.pnzgu.ru. 2014. № 3(7). C. 3-5.
Simonyan R.Z. Aktual nye problemy ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za nezakonnoe provedenie iskusstvennogo preryvaniya beremennosti // Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal prikladnykh i fundamental nykh issledovaniy, 2016. № 11 S. 552- 555.
Tasakov S.V. Nravstvennye osnovy norm ugolovnogo prava o prestupleniyakh protiv lichnosti / Tasakov S.V. - SPb.: YUrid. TSentr Press. 2008.- 153 s.
Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii. CHasti Obshchaya i Osobennaya: ucheb./pod red. A.V.Brilliantova. - M.: Prospekt, 2010. 1232 s. (Avtor glavy A.YU.Zakharov).
Internet-resurs: https://ru.wikipedia.org
Prigovor № 1-157/2011 Vyazemskogo rayonnogo suda Smolenskoy oblasti ot 15 avgusta 2011 g. https://rospravosudie.com/court-vyazemskij-rajonnyj-sud-smolenskaya-oblast-s/act-100135071/.
Prigovor № 1-121/10 YArtsevskogo gorodskogo suda Smolenskoy oblasti ot 13 avgusta 2010 g. https://rospravosudie.com/court-yarcevskij-gorodskoj-sud-smolenskaya-oblast-s/act-101131170/
Sobranie zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2003. № 50. St. 4848.
Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus
Prigovor po delu № 1-109-2011 Olyekminskogo rayonnogo suda Respubliki Sakha (YAkutiya) ot 29.sentyabrya 2011 g. https://rospravosudie.com/court-olekminskij-rajonnyj-sud-respublika-saxa-yakutiya-s/act-456248751/.
Prigovor po delu № 1-185 Zvenigovskiy rayonnyy sud Respubliki Mariy El ot 11 noyabrya 2010g. https://rospravosudie.com/court-zvenigovskij-rajonnyj-sud-respublika-marij-el-s/act-104309847/
Prigovor Kurumkanskogo rayonnogo suda Respubliki Buryatiya v otnoshenii Sambotsyrenova A. N. https://rospra-vosudie.com/court-kurumkanskij-rajonnyj-sud-respublika-buryatiya-s/act-101292301/.;
Opredelenie Verkhovnogo suda RF № 68-Dp02-6 ot 20.11.2002.
https://spid-vich-zppp.ru/.
Internet-resurs:https://spid-vich-zppp.ru/statistika/ ofitsialnaya-statistika-vich-spid-rf- 2016.html
Osnovnye pokazateli deyatel nosti ugolovno-ispolnitel noy sistemy FSIN Rossii za yanvar -dekabr 2016. Informatsionno-analiticheskiy sbornik. FKU NIIIT FSIN Rossii. Tver 2017. S. 356-380.
https://medvestnik.ru/content/news/Rost-chisla-bolnyh-VICh-v-Rossii-obyasnili-sovershenstvovaniem-statistiches-kogo-nabludeniya.html.
Sistema GARANT: http://base.garant.ru/12155259/ ixzz52cd3Y8uV.
Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus http://www.consultant.ru/
Prigovor ot 20 maya 2011 g. po delu № 1-33/2011.http://sudact.ru.