Conclusion of the contract of carriage of goods: prerequisites, procedure and their legal significance
( Pp. 84-86)

More about authors
Staroselceva Marina Mikhailovna kand. yurid. nauk. Dolzhnost: zamestitel nachalnika kafedry. Mesto raboty: Belgorodskiy yuridicheskiy institut MVD Rossii imeni I.D. Putilina. Podrazdelenie: kafedra grazhdansko-pravovyh disciplin.
Belgorod Law Institute of MIA Russia named after I.D. Putilin Tishhenko Irina Victorovna kand. yurid. nauk. Dolzhnost: docent. Mesto raboty: Belgorodskiy yuridicheskiy institut MVD Rossii imeni I.D. Putilina. Podrazdelenie: kafedra grazhdansko-pravovyh disciplin
Belgorod Law Institute of MIA Russia named after I.D. Putilin Kolesova Tatiana Stanislavovna kand. yurid. nauk. Dolzhnost: starshiy prepodavatel. Mesto raboty: Belgorodskiy yuridicheskiy institut MVD Rossii imeni I.D. Putilina. Podrazdelenie: kafedra grazhdansko-pravovyh disciplin.
Belgorod Law Institute of MIA Russia named after I.D. Putilin Burlova Julia Alexandrovna kand. yurid. nauk. Dolzhnost: prepodavatel. Mesto raboty: Krasnodarskiy universitet MVD Rossii. Filial: Stavropolskiy filial. Podrazdelenie: kafedra gosudarstvennyh i grazhdansko-pravovyh disciplin.
Krasnodar University of MIA Russia. Branch: Stavropol branch
Abstract:
Contract of carriage of goods today is one of the most common types of transport contracts. Despite the rather detailed legal regulation in the civil legislation, there are some problems in the practice of its individual rules. This is primarily due to the existence of numerous special laws and codes governing certain types of contract for the carriage of goods. The transport legislation is still in the process of updating, so the purpose of the article is, first of all, to determine the basic prerequisites and features of its conclusion. The research methodology consists of General scientific methods of cognition: dialectical-materialistic, comparative, historical, systemic and others. The authors draw conclusions concerning the amendments to the current legislation on the carriage of goods, as well as the elements necessary for its conclusion.
How to Cite:
Staroselceva M.M., Tishhenko I.V., Kolesova T.S., Burlova J.A., (2018), CONCLUSION OF THE CONTRACT OF CARRIAGE OF GOODS: PREREQUISITES, PROCEDURE AND THEIR LEGAL SIGNIFICANCE. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 6 => 84-86.
Reference list:
Allakhverdov M.A., Savichev G.P. Dogovory o perevozkakh gruzov. M., 1967. S. 104.
Astanovskiy G.B., Smirnov V.T. Konteynernye perevozki na zheleznodorozhnom transporte. M., 1976. S. 18.
Vitryanskiy V.V. Dogovor perevozki. M., 2001. S. 394.
Grechukha V.N. Transportnoe pravo Rossii: ucheb. dlya magistrov. M., 2012. S. 286.
Dutov I.S., Dutova N.V.Dogovor perevozki gruza // Zakon. 2003. №7. S. 37; Kommentariy k Ustavu zheleznykh dorog SSSR/ Pod red. Astanovskogo G.B.M., YUridicheskaya literatura. 1971. S. 7.
Egiazarov V.A. Pravovoe regulirovanie perevozok gruzov v konteynerakh v SSSR. Avtoref. Diss. kand. yurid. Nauk. M., 1975. S. 7
Kalpin A.G. Grazhdanskoe pravo: Uchebnik. CH. I. / Pod red. A.G. Kalpina, A.I. Maslyaeva. M.: YUnost , 2000. S. 181.
Kabalkin A.YU. Uslugi v sisteme otnosheniy, reguliruemykh grazhdanskim pravom // Sbornik statey Sfera uslug: grazhdansko-pravovoe regulirovanie pod red. Sukhanova E.A., Sannikovoy L.V. M., Infotropik Mediya. 2011. S. 7.
Lonchakova YU.A. Dogovor avtomobil noy perevozki gruzov v sisteme transportnykh dogovorov: dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2009. S. 62.
Naroznikov N.K. K voprosu o pravovoy kvalifikatsii perevozki // Zakony Rossii. 2009. № 8. S. 9.
Nikolishin R.V. Grazhdansko-pravovoe regulirovanie otnosheniy v sfere perevozki gruzov zheleznodorozhnym transportom: Avtoref. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2008. S. 6.
Tarasov M.A. Dogovor perevozki gruzov po sovetskomu grazhdanskomu pravu. Rostov-na-Donu. 1954. S. 130.
KHodunov M.E. Pravovoe regulirovanie deyatel nosti transporta. M., 1965. S. 58.
SHershenevich G.F. Uchebnik russkogo grazhdanskogo prava. M., 1991. S. 444.